Monthly Archives: October 2012

Obesity-dependent cannabinoid modulation of proliferation in adult neurogenic regions.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Endocannabinoid signalling participates in the control of neurogenesis, especially after brain insults. Obesity may explain alterations in physiology affecting neurogenesis, although it is unclear whether cannabinoid signalling may modulate neural proliferation in obese animals. Here we analyse the impact of obesity by using two approaches, a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% fat) and a standard/low-fat diet (STD, 10% fat), and the response to a subchronic treatment with the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) inverse agonist AM251 (3 mg/kg) on cell proliferation of two relevant neurogenic regions, namely the subventricular zone in the striatal wall of the lateral ventricle (SVZ) and the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus (SGZ), and also in the hypothalamus given its role in energy metabolism. We found evidence of an interaction between diet-induced obesity and CB1 signalling in the regulation of cell proliferation. AM251 reduced caloric intake and body weight in obese rats, as well as corrected plasma levels of cholesterol and triglycerides. AM251 is shown, for the first time, to modulate cell proliferation in HFD-obese rats only. We observed an increase in the number of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-labelled (BrdU+) cells in the SGZ, but a decrease in the number of BrdU+ cells in the SVZ and the hypothalamus of AM251-treated HFD rats. These BrdU+ cells expressed the neuron-specific βIII-tubulin. These results suggest that obesity may impact cell proliferation in the brain selectively, and provide support for a role of CB1 signalling regulation of neurogenesis in response to obesity.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21395869

Obesity, the Endocannabinoid System, and Bias Arising from Pharmaceutical Sponsorship

Posted on by
Reply

“Previous research has shown that academic physicians conflicted by funding from the pharmaceutical industry have corrupted evidence based medicine and helped enlarge the market for drugs. Physicians made pharmaceutical-friendly statements, engaged in disease mongering, and signed biased review articles ghost-authored by corporate employees.

 This paper tested the hypothesis that bias affects review articles regarding rimonabant, an anti-obesity drug that blocks the central cannabinoid receptor.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings are characteristic of bias that arises from financial conflicts of interest, and suggestive of ghostwriting by a common author. Resolutions for this scenario are proposed.

In summary, financial conflicts permeate the system and are by no means limited to corporations referenced in this article, such as Merck, Parke-Davis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Wyeth-Ayerst. On balance, pharmaceutical corporations do good work and aid in humanitarian efforts. For example Sanofi-Aventis provides artemisinin at cost to malaria-endemic countries. Nevertheless, ghost authorship and the corrupting effects of covert financial support must cease. Only three of eight rimonabant review articles disclosed corporate sponsorship; two authors specifically denied conflicts. Lack of disclosure prevents readers from judging the credibility of an author. Medical journals should require stronger author disclosure procedures, and universities should discipline academics who sign ghostwritten articles. This behavior should be regarded as unethical misconduct. More broadly, researchers with conflicts of interest should not be allowed to sit on guideline committees and regulatory boards. Corporate funding of CME programs and review articles should be abolished.

While this paper was under review, Merck halted taranabant RCTs, and Sanofi-Aventis removed rimonabant from the European market. The FDA rejected rimonabant after data submitted by Sanofi-Aventis revealed adverse effects in RIO trials that went unreported in RIO publications [86], including one death in a rimonabant-treated subject (ruled a suicide by the FDA, [86]) that did not appear in the pertinent publication [7]. Although the risk-benefit ratio of cannabinoid receptor blockade may preclude its use for chronic conditions such as obesity and drug or alcohol dependence, cannabinoid receptor blockade could serve in the treatment of acute endocannabinoid dysregulation, such as hepatic cirrhosis, hemorrhagic or endotoxic shock, cardiac reperfusion injury, and doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659447/

 

Rimonabant: a novel selective cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonist for treatment of obesity.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“PURPOSE:

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of rimonabant in the treatment of obesity and related metabolic factors are reviewed.

SUMMARY:

Discovery of the cannabinoid receptors has led to the development of rimonabant, a cannabinoid-1 (CB(1)) antagonist. Selective blockade of this receptor has been shown to lead to decreased appetite and food intake in animal models. Clinical studies have shown that rimonabant 20 mg once daily produces significant decreases in weight and waist circumference in obese human subjects and improves the lipid profile and glucose control. The frequency of metabolic syndrome also decreased significantly with rimonabant 20 mg daily. Limited data are available regarding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rimonabant. Preclinical data have demonstrated a long duration of action. As of yet, no drug-drug, drug-food, or drug-disease interactions have been identified with rimonabant. Adverse reactions occurred rarely, with nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, arthralgia, and back pain being the most common. Psychiatric disorders, including depression and anxiety, were the most common reasons for subjects to withdraw from rimonabant studies. Rimonabant has been shown to be safe for up to two years of treatment. Further research will clarify currently unknown areas, including pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and the drug’s role in standard therapy.

CONCLUSION:

Rimonabant, a selective CB(1) antagonist, is a novel treatment option for obese and overweight individuals. Significant weight loss, decrease in waist circumference, and improvements in lipid profile and glucose control have been shown in clinical trials of rimonabant.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17322160

Rimonabant: an antagonist drug of the endocannabinoid system for the treatment of obesity.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Obesity, an ever-increasing problem in the industrialized world, has long been a target of research for a cure or, at least, control of its expansion. In the search for treatment, the recently discovered endocannabinoid system has emerged as a new target for controlling obesity and its associated conditions. The endocannabinoid system plays an important role in controlling weight and energy balance in humans. This system is activated to a greater extent in obese patients, and the specific blockage of its receptors is the aim of rimonabant, one of the most recent drugs created for the treatment of obesity. This drug acts as a blockade for endocannabinoid receptors found in the brain and peripheral organs that play an important role on carbohydrate and fat metabolism. Clinical studies have confirmed that, when used in combination with a low calorie diet, rimonabant promotes loss in body weight, loss in abdominal circumference, and improvements in dyslipidemia. Rimonabant is also being tested as a potential anti-smoking treatment since endocannabinoids are related to the pleasurable effect of nicotine. Thus, rimonabant constitutes a new therapeutic approach to obesity and cardiovascular risk factors. Studies show effectiveness in weight loss; however, side effects such as psychiatric alterations have been reported, including depression and anxiety. These side effects have led the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) to not approve this drug in the United States. For a more complete evaluation on the safety of this drug, additional studies are in progress.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19443932

[Rimonabant (Acomplia), specific inhibitor of the endocannabinoid system].

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The endocannabinoid system plays a major role in the regulation of body energy by stimulation of the appetite in the hypothalamus and increase of fat accumulation in adipocytes. The blockade of the cannabinoid system (CB1) by the specific inhibitor (rimonabant) decreases food intake and adiposity in animals and in humans. Moreover rimonabant lowers tobacco addiction. Clinical studies (RIO-LIPIDS and RIO-EUROPE) have recently confirmed that rimonabant combined with a hypocaloric diet over 1 year, promoted significant decrease of body weight, waist circumference and improvement of dyslipidemia. Rimonabant was well tolerated with mild and transient side effects. The future place of rimonabant in the strategy of obesity is still to be clarified.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16038141

The endocannabinoid system and rimonabant: a new drug with a novel mechanism of action involving cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonism–or inverse agonism–as potential obesity treatment and other therapeutic use.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“There is considerable evidence that the endocannabinoid (endogenous cannabinoid) system plays a significant role in appetitive drive and associated behaviours. It is therefore reasonable to hypothesize that the attenuation of the activity of this system would have therapeutic benefit in treating disorders that might have a component of excess appetitive drive or over-activity of the endocannabinoid system, such as obesity, ethanol and other drug abuse, and a variety of central nervous system and other disorders. Towards this end, antagonists of cannabinoid receptors have been designed through rational drug discovery efforts. Devoid of the abuse concerns that confound and impede the use of cannabinoid receptor agonists for legitimate medical purposes, investigation of the use of cannabinoid receptor antagonists as possible pharmacotherapeutic agents is currently being actively investigated. The compound furthest along this pathway is rimonabant, a selective CB(1) (cannabinoid receptor subtype 1) antagonist, or inverse agonist, approved in the European Union and under regulatory review in the United States for the treatment of obesity. This article summarizes the basic science of the endocannabinoid system and the therapeutic potential of cannabinoid receptor antagonists, with emphasis on the treatment of obesity.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489873

Cannabinoid receptor antagonists: pharmacological opportunities, clinical experience, and translational prognosis.

Posted on by
2

Abstract

“The endogenous cannabinoid (CB) (endocannabinoid) signaling system is involved in a variety of (patho)physiological processes, primarily by virtue of natural, arachidonic acid-derived lipids (endocannabinoids) that activate G protein-coupled CB1 and CB2 receptors. A hyperactive endocannabinoid system appears to contribute to the etiology of several disease states that constitute significant global threats to human health. Consequently, mounting interest surrounds the design and profiling of receptor-targeted CB antagonists as pharmacotherapeutics that attenuate endocannabinoid transmission for salutary gain. Experimental and clinical evidence supports the therapeutic potential of CB1 receptor antagonists to treat overweight/obesity, obesity-related cardiometabolic disorders, and substance abuse. Laboratory data suggest that CB2 receptor antagonists might be effective immunomodulatory and, perhaps, anti-inflammatory drugs. One CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, rimonabant, has emerged as the first-in-class drug approved outside the United States for weight control. Select follow-on agents (taranabant, otenabant, surinabant, rosonabant, SLV-319, AVE1625, V24343) have also been studied in the clinic. However, rimonabant’s market withdrawal in the European Union and suspension of rimonabant’s, taranabant’s, and otenabant’s ongoing development programs have highlighted some adverse clinical side effects (especially nausea and psychiatric disturbances) of CB1 receptor antagonists/inverse agonists. Novel CB1 receptor ligands that are peripherally directed and/or exhibit neutral antagonism (the latter not affecting constitutive CB1 receptor signaling) may optimize the benefits of CB1 receptor antagonists while minimizing any risk. Indeed, CB1 receptor-neutral antagonists appear from preclinical data to offer efficacy comparable to or better than that of prototype CB1 receptor antagonists/inverse agonists, with less propensity to induce nausea. Continued pharmacological profiling, as the prelude to first-in-man testing of CB1 receptor antagonists with unique modes of targeting/pharmacological action, represents an exciting translational frontier in the critical path to CB receptor blockers as medicines.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19249987

Inverse agonism and neutral antagonism at cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“There are at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, both G protein coupled. CB1 receptors are expressed predominantly at nerve terminals and mediate inhibition of transmitter release whereas CB2 receptors are found mainly on immune cells, one of their roles being to modulate cytokine release. Endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonists also exist and these “endocannabinoids” together with their receptors constitute the “endocannabinoid system”. These discoveries were followed by the development of a number of CB1- and CB2-selective antagonists that in some CB1 or CB2 receptor-containing systems also produce “inverse cannabimimetic effects”, effects opposite in direction from those produced by cannabinoid receptor agonists. This review focuses on the CB1-selective antagonists, SR141716A, AM251, AM281 and LY320135, and discusses possible mechanisms by which these ligands produce their inverse effects: (1) competitive surmountable antagonism at CB1 receptors of endogenously released endocannabinoids, (2) inverse agonism resulting from negative, possibly allosteric, modulation of the constitutive activity of CB1 receptors in which CB1 receptors are shifted from a constitutively active “on” state to one or more constitutively inactive “off” states and (3) CB1 receptor-independent mechanisms, for example antagonism of endogenously released adenosine at A1 receptors. Recently developed neutral competitive CB1 receptor antagonists, which are expected to produce inverse effects through antagonism of endogenously released endocannabinoids but not by modulating CB1 receptor constitutive activity, are also discussed. So too are possible clinical consequences of the production of inverse cannabimimetic effects, there being convincing evidence that released endocannabinoids can have “autoprotective” roles.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15670612

Neutral antagonism at the cannabinoid 1 receptor: a safer treatment for obesity.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Obesity is a global problem with often strong neurobiological underpinnings. The cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) was put forward as a promising drug target for antiobesity medication. However, the first marketed CB1R antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant was discontinued, as its use was occasionally associated with negative affect and suicidality. In artificial cell systems, CB1Rs can become constitutively active in the absence of ligands. Here, we show that such constitutive CB1R activity also regulates GABAergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission in the ventral tegmental area and basolateral amygdala, regions which regulate motivation and emotions. We show that CB1R inverse agonists like rimonabant suppress the constitutive CB1R activity in such regions, and cause anxiety and reduced motivation for reward. The neutral CB1R antagonist NESS0327 does not suppress constitutive activity and lacks these negative effects. Importantly, however, both rimonabant and NESS0327 equally reduce weight gain and food intake. Together, these findings suggest that neutral CB1R antagonists can treat obesity efficiently and more safely than inverse agonists.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23070073

Cannabinoid 1 G protein-coupled receptor (periphero-)neutral antagonists: emerging therapeutics for treating obesity-driven metabolic disease and reducing cardiovascular risk.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Introduction: Obesity and related cardiometabolic derangements are spiraling global health problems urgently in need of safe, effective and durable pharmacotherapy. Areas covered: As an orexigenic and anabolic biosignaling network, the endocannabinoid system interacts with other information-transducing pathways to help ensure metabolic homeostasis. Hyperphagia stimulates reinforcing neuronal circuits favoring energy intake and conservation, inviting overweight/obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors (‘metabolic syndrome’). Associated increases in cannabinoid 1 G protein-coupled receptor (CB1R) activity/expression further exacerbate food consumption and the metabolic shift toward fat production and accumulation. The role of CB1R activity in hyperphagia and weight gain spurred the development of rimonabant (SR141716; Acomplia), the first-in-class CB1R antagonist/inverse agonist weight-loss drug. Rimonabant and similar CB1R inverse agonists also exert pleiotropic actions in addition to weight-loss effects that help correct obesity-related metabolic derangements and reduce cardiovascular risk in humans. The medicinal utility of these agents was crippled by clinically significant central and peripheral adverse effects that appear to reflect CB1R inverse agonists as a class. Consequently, increased attention is being given to CB1R neutral antagonists, CB1R blockers with intrinsically weak, if any, functional potency to elicit the negative-efficacy responses associated with inverse agonists. Laboratory studies demonstrate that CB1R neutral antagonists – whether readily accessible to the central nervous system or not (i.e., ‘periphero-neutral’ antagonists) – retain the salient therapeutic effects of CB1R inverse agonists on hyperphagia, weight-gain, and obesity-driven metabolic abnormalities with the distinct advantage of being associated with significantly less preclinical adverse events than are conventional CB1R inverse agonists such as rimonabant. Expert opinion: CB1R (periphero-)neutral antagonists merit continued analysis of their molecular pharmacology and evaluation of their therapeutic significance and translational potential as new-generation medicines for obesity-related derangements, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes, if not obesity itself.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22646861