Monthly Archives: May 2016

MicroRNA let-7d is a target of cannabinoid CB1 receptor and controls cannabinoid signaling.

Posted on by
Reply

“Cannabinoid CB1 receptor, the molecular target of endocannabinoids and cannabis active components, is one of the most abundant metabotropic receptors in the brain. Cannabis is widely used for both recreational and medicinal purposes.

Despite the ever-growing fundamental roles of microRNAs in the brain, the possible molecular connections between the CB1 receptor and microRNAs are surprisingly unknown. Here, by using reporter gene constructs that express interaction sequences for microRNAs in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, we show that CB1 receptor activation enhances the expression of several microRNAs, including let-7d.

Taken together, these findings provide the first evidence for a bidirectional link between the CB1 receptor and a microRNA, namely let-7d, and thus unveil a new player in the complex process of cannabinoid action.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27179908

Interactions between cannabinoid receptor agonists and mu opioid receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys discriminating fentanyl.

Posted on by
Reply

“Cannabinoid receptor agonists such as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) enhance some (antinociceptive) but not other (positive reinforcing) effects of mu opioid receptor agonists, suggesting that cannabinoids might be combined with opioids to treat pain without increasing, and possibly decreasing, abuse.

These data indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of nalbuphine are more sensitive to attenuation by cannabinoids than those of fentanyl. That the discriminative stimulus effects of some opioids are more susceptible to modification by drugs from other classes has implications for developing maximally effective therapeutic drug mixtures with reduced abuse liability.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184925

Phytocannabinoids and cannabimimetic drugs: recent patents in central nervous system disorders.

Posted on by
Reply

“Starting from the chemical structure of phytocannabinoids, isolated from Cannabis sativa plant, research groups designed numerous cannabimimetic drugs.

These compounds according to their activities can be partial, full agonists and antagonists of cannabinoid receptors.

Anecdotal reports and scientific studies described beneficial properties of cannabinoids and their derivatives in several pathological conditions like neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, and in many other diseases ranging from cancer, atherosclerosis, stroke, hypertension, inflammatory related disorders, and autoimmune diseases.

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor was considered particularly interesting for therapeutic approaches in neurological diseases, because primarily expressed by neurons of the central nervous system. In many experimental models, these drugs act via this receptor, however, CB1 receptor independent mechanisms have been also described. Furthermore, endogenous ligands of cannabinoid receptors, the endocannabinoids, are potent modulators of the synaptic function in the brain. In neurological diseases, numerous studies reported modulation of the levels of endocannabinoids according to the phase of the disease and its progression.

CONCLUSIONS:

Finally, although the study of the mechanisms of action of these compounds is still unsolved, many reports and patents strongly suggest therapeutic potential of these compounds in neurological diseases.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184693

Beyond Cannabis: Plants and the Endocannabinoid System.

Posted on by
Reply

“Plants have been the predominant source of medicines throughout the vast majority of human history, and remain so today outside of industrialized societies.

One of the most versatile in terms of its phytochemistry is cannabis, whose investigation has led directly to the discovery of a unique and widespread homeostatic physiological regulator, the endocannabinoid system.

While it had been the conventional wisdom until recently that only cannabis harbored active agents affecting the endocannabinoid system, in recent decades the search has widened and identified numerous additional plants whose components stimulate, antagonize, or modulate different aspects of this system.

These include common foodstuffs, herbs, spices, and more exotic ingredients: kava, chocolate, black pepper, and many others that are examined in this review.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27179600

Neuroprotection by Cannabinoids in Huntington’s Disease

Posted on by
Reply

“A Double Blind, Randomized, Cross Over, Placebo Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Asses Neuroprotection by Cannabinoids in Huntington’s Disease.”

ClinicalTrials.gov

“Huntington’s disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, related to an abnormal expansion of CAG triplets in the huntingtin gene, characterized by motor, cognitive and behavioral abnormalities, without known effective symptomatic treatment and without known disease slowing strategy. The most severe neuropathological lesions observed in HD take place in the striatum, one brain area important in motor control and rich in cannabinoid receptors (CBR). CBR are subdivided in two classes: CB1R are located in neurons and play a role in neuronal function; CB2R in brain are located mostly in microglia and modulate neuroinflammation.

CBR disappear early in the course of HD, before there is a massive drop out of cells in the striatum. Cannabinoid transmission is also an early event in brains of animal models of HD. In R6/2 mice, which carry large CAG expansions and develop an early and severe HD phenotype the suppression of the CB1R gene further accelerate the development of a severe clinical syndrome and the characteristic brain inclusions and abnormalities of synaptic density. R6/2 treated mice treated with cannabinoids improve their clinical phenotype, their brain lesions, the synaptic density and the levels of BNDF, a neurotrophic factor which enhances survival and resistance of striatal neurons.

Preliminary studies of cannabinoids in patients with HD have shown that these compounds are safe in these patients.”

https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01502046

Cannabis in Pain Treatment: Clinical and Research Considerations

Posted on by
Reply

“Cannabinoids show promise as therapeutic agents, particularly as analgesics, but their development and clinical use has been complicated by recognition of their botanical source, cannabis, as a substance of misuse.

Although research into endogenous cannabinoid systems and potential cannabinoid pharmaceuticals is slowly increasing, there has been intense societal interest in making herbal (plant) cannabis available for medicinal use; 23 U.S. States and all Canadian provinces currently permit use in some clinical contexts.

Whether or not individual professionals support the clinical use of herbal cannabis, all clinicians will encounter patients who elect to use it and therefore need to be prepared to advise them on cannabis-related clinical issues despite limited evidence to guide care.

Expanded research on cannabis is needed to better determine the individual and public health effects of increasing use of herbal cannabis and to advance understanding of the pharmaceutical potential of cannabinoids as medications.

This article reviews clinical, research, and policy issues related to herbal cannabis to support clinicians in thoughtfully advising and caring for patients who use cannabis, and it examines obstacles and opportunities to expand research on the health effects of herbal cannabis and cannabinoids.

Perspective

Herbal cannabis is increasingly available for clinical use in the United States despite continuing controversies over its efficacy and safety. This article explores important considerations in the use of plant Cannabis to better prepare clinicians to care for patients who use it, and identifies needed directions for research.”

http://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900%2816%2900543-5/fulltext

“APS Issues New Guidance on Medical Marijuana for Pain”  http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/863396

Potentiation of cannabinoid-induced cytotoxicity in Mantle Cell Lymphoma through modulation of ceramide metabolism

Posted on by
Reply

Logo of nihpa

“Ceramide accumulation is a widely described event in cancers after various treatments.

Ceramide levels are elevated in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) cells following treatment with cannabinoids.

In previous publications we and others observed that induction of ceramide accumulation by cannabinoids leads to apoptosis in MCL, glioma and pancreatic cancer.

Here, we investigated the pathways of ceramide accumulation in the MCL cell line Rec-1 using the stable endocannabinoid analogue R(+)-methanandamide (R-MA).

Our findings suggest that R-MA induces cell death in MCL via CB1-mediated upregulation of the de novo ceramide synthesis pathway.

This is the first study showing that the cytotoxic effect of a cannabinoid can be enhanced by modulation of ceramide metabolism.

The results suggest that interference with ceramide conversion may provide a tool to enhance the targeted cell death-promoting effects of cannabinoids in MCL and other malignant lymphomas overexpressing the CB1 receptor.

Cannabinoids have been suggested as a new non-toxic therapeutic option for cancer treatment.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3077284/

Cannabinoid receptors in mantle cell lymphoma

Posted on by
Reply

Logo of cc

“Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non-curable B cell lymphoma that in several independent studies have been shown to express higher levels of CB1 and CB2 than non-malignant B cells.

The endocannabinoid system is dysregulated in many types of cancer and is involved in the regulation of survival and proliferation of cancer cells and cancer stem cells, in cancer metabolism, as well as in pro-metastatic events such as angiogenesis, migration and invasion.

Previous in vitro studies of MCL cell lines and primary ex vivo isolated tumor cells have demonstrated that high concentrations of cannabinoid receptor ligands induced proliferation arrest and programmed cell death.

All together, the data suggest that perturbations in the endocannabinoid system participate in the regulation of multi-functional cell responses regarding proliferation, migration and cell death control.

Therefore, it can be concluded that further studies on pharmacological modulation of endocannabinoid accumulation and/or signaling offers an interesting option for novel anti-lymphoma therapy.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4353235/

Cannabinoid receptor-mediated apoptosis induced by R(+)-methanandamide and Win55,212-2 is associated with ceramide accumulation and p38 activation in mantle cell lymphoma.

Posted on by
Reply

“We have recently shown that cannabinoids induce growth inhibition and apoptosis in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a malignant B-cell lymphoma that expresses high levels of cannabinoid receptor types 1 and 2 (CB(1) and CB(2)).

In the current study, the role of each receptor and the signal transduction triggered by receptor ligation were investigated.

The present data suggest that targeting CB(1)/CB(2) may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16936228

Cannabinoid receptor ligands mediate growth inhibition and cell death in mantle cell lymphoma.

Posted on by
Reply

“We have earlier reported overexpression of the central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

In this study, treatment with cannabinoid receptor ligands caused a decrease in viability of MCL cells, while control cells lacking CB1 were not affected.

Our data suggest that cannabinoid receptors may be considered as potential therapeutic targets in MCL.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16337199

“In conclusion, we have found that cannabinoid receptor ligands induce decreased viability, growth suppression and cell death by apoptosis in MCL cells, which express high levels of the CB1 receptor and moderate levels of CB2.

The current results in vitro suggest that CB1/CB2 ligands should be considered as agents for the treatment of MCL.”  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.11.020/full