Monthly Archives: February 2025

Chronic Disease Symptoms Self-Managed by Cannabis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted billions of people worldwide, particularly those with chronic health conditions, and has been associated with increases in substance use, including cannabis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cannabis use for symptom management of chronic health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Methods: The COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study is an ongoing study among adults ≥18 who self-report cannabis use. Analyses included 1,466 responses received between March 21, 2020, and March 23, 2022, from participants who self-reported cannabis use and a chronic health condition. We examined comorbidities, symptoms managed with cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic, and fear regarding COVID-19 diagnosis and transmission using the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared, and T-tests were conducted. Results were stratified by those who reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition (medicinal cannabis user, n = 1,333) and those who did not use cannabis to manage chronic health condition (non-medicinal cannabis user, n = 133). 

Results: Most (90.9%, n = 1,333) of the total sample (mean age: 47.1 years [standard deviations {SD} = 15.0]) reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition, of which 46.1% (n = 615) reported having a medical card/recommendation, and 4.6% received recommendations to use cannabis to manage COVID-19 from health professionals. There were significant differences in age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education by medicinal cannabis use status. Comorbidities prevalent among medicinal cannabis consumers were mental health-related (66.1%), pain (58.5%), cardiometabolic-related (30.5%), immune-related (21.9%), and respiratory-related (20.8%). The most reported symptoms self-managed with cannabis during the pandemic were sleep (69.2%), chronic noncancer pain (49.7%), acute pain (46.5%), headaches/migraines (39.0%), muscle spasms (33.6%), nausea/vomiting (30.6%), and appetite stimulant (29.9%). There were no statistical differences in COVID-19 testing, fear of diagnosis, fear of transmission, or isolation due to COVID-19 between medicinal and nonmedicinal cannabis consumers in this sample. 

Conclusions: The perceived therapeutic benefit of cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident by the high prevalence of adults who reported using cannabis for medicinal reasons despite no recommendation from their health provider. Research is necessary to understand the prospective impact of cannabis use for self-management of chronic disease, especially within the context of COVID-19.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40008990/

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/can.2023.0234

Cannabis use and illicit opioid cessation among people who use drugs living with chronic pain

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Introduction: Amidst the opioid overdose crisis, there is interest in cannabis use for pain management and harm reduction. We investigated the relationship between cannabis use and cessation of unregulated opioid use among people who use drugs (PWUD) living with chronic pain.

Method: Data for analyses were collected from three prospective cohort studies in Vancouver, Canada. All cohort participants who completed at least two study visits and reported both pain and unregulated opioid use in the past 6 months were included in the present study. We analysed the association between cannabis use frequency and opioid cessation rates using extended Cox regression models with time-updated covariates.

Results: Between June 2014 and May 2022, 2340 PWUD were initially recruited and of those 1242 PWUD reported chronic pain, use of unregulated opioids and completed at least two follow-up visits. Of these 1242 participants, 764 experienced a cessation event over 1038.2 person-years resulting in a cessation rate of 28.5 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.4-31.9). Daily cannabis use was positively associated with opioid cessation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.81; p = 0.011). In the sex-stratified sub-analyses, daily cannabis use was significantly associated with increased rates of opioid cessation among males (adjusted hazard ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.08; p = 0.014).

Discussion and conclusions: Participants reporting daily cannabis use exhibited higher rates of cessation compared to less frequent users or non-users. Observed sex-specific differences in cannabis use and opioid cessation suggest potential differences in cannabis use behaviours and effects. Our findings add to the growing evidence supporting the potential benefits of cannabis use among PWUD, underlining the need for further research.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40011075/

Pain Predicts Cannabis Initiation Among Emerging Adults: Results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Pain is highly prevalent among emerging adults (18-25 years old), and rates of cannabis use are increasing among this population. Research indicates pain is a unique risk factor and motivator for substance use. However, evidence for pain-cannabis use relations among emerging adults is largely cross-sectional, and the only prospective evidence focuses on the frequency, quantity, and consequences of cannabis use, not initiation.

Accordingly, this is the first study to examine pain as a prospective predictor of cannabis initiation among emerging adults.

Data were drawn from five annual waves of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Emerging adults who denied cannabis use at baseline (n = 4,185) were included in the analysis. At baseline, a tenth of emerging adults reported moderate/severe pain (≥4/10). Adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed that emerging adults with moderate/severe baseline pain were more likely to initiate cannabis use, and did so earlier over the subsequent 4 years, than those with no/low baseline pain.

These findings provide initial evidence for pain as a risk factor for cannabis initiation during emerging adulthood. Future research is needed to identify mechanisms by which pain motivates cannabis initiation and to examine the utility of pain-targeted content in cannabis use prevention and intervention efforts among emerging adults.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40009033/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08964289.2025.2465525

Inhibitory Potential of Cannabis Biomass Extracts on Livestock-Associated Staphylococcal and Streptococcal Pathogens

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Diseases caused by staphylococci and streptococci are a serious burden on livestock production, causing significant losses. In addition, the associated antibiotic resistance of these pathogens often makes treatment impossible or prolonged.

Cannabis sativa L. contains many compounds with antibacterial properties and shows great potential as a natural antimicrobial agent for agricultural use against both of these bacterial species.

The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro antibacterial activity of ethanol extracts from five cultivars of hemp, namely, Bialobrzeskie, Felina 32, Futura 75, mixed and Santhica 27, against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus dysgalactiae.

All five cultivars exhibited a certain degree of inhibitory effect against all the pathogens tested with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 128 to 2048 μg/mL. The extract from the Santhica 27 cultivar was the most effective antibacterial agent with the lowest MIC value of 128 μg/mL against Str. agalactiae and two clinical isolates of S. aureus, followed by Bialobrzeskie and mixed cultivars with the same growth-inhibitory potential against Str. agalactiae.

The extracts from the Felina 32 and Futura 75 cultivars presented only weak activity with MIC values ranging from 256 to 2048 μg/mL. The extract from the Santhica 27 cultivar appears to be a promising product for future use in the treatment of staphylococcal and streptococcal infections in livestock.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40005797/

“In this study, the antibacterial activity of ethanol extracts obtained from five different hemp cultivars (Felina 32, Futura 75, mixed, Santhica 27 and Bialobrzeskie) against various strains of S. aureus, Str. agalactiae and Str. dysgalactiae, including their antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-sensitive forms, was investigated.

All five ethanol cannabis extracts possessed specific growth-inhibitory potential against the bacteria tested, while Santhica 27 was identified as the most effective cultivar followed by the mixed and Bialobrzeskie cultivars. In the case of the Felina 32 and Futura 75 cultivars, only weak antibacterial activity was observed.

In the context of ever-increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotics, it is necessary to find alternatives to antibiotic treatment, and cannabis has great potential in this area.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/2/432

Cannabidiol (CBD) Acts as an Antioxidant on Gardnerella vaginalis, Resulting in Reduced Metabolic Activity, Loss of Survivability, and Elimination of Biofilms

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Gardnerella vaginalis is a natural inhabitant of the vagina, but when an imbalance occurs in the vaginal microbiota, this bacterium can cause vaginosis, a condition that must be treated when symptomatic and prior to a gynecological intervention. Cannabidiol (CBD) is an anti-inflammatory compound that also has antibacterial activities against several Gram-positive and certain Gram-negative bacteria. 

Objectives: Since G. vaginalis is an opportunistic pathogenic Gram-variable bacterium, we investigated its response to CBD. 

Methods: The antibacterial activity of CBD was studied by broth dilution assay, changes in intracellular ATP levels, and the ability of bacteria to recover on chocolate agar plates. The antibiofilm activity was investigated by MTT metabolic assay, crystal violet staining, and HR-SEM. Flow cytometric analyses were performed to measure changes in membrane potential, membrane perforation, and metabolic activity. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was analyzed using the nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) reagent. Gene expression was determined by semi-quantitative real-time PCR, while protein composition was determined by LC-MS/MS analysis. 

Results: We observed that G. vaginalis clinical isolates exhibited high susceptibility to CBD with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2.5 µg/mL CBD. CBD induced rapid membrane hyperpolarization and caused cytoplasmic leakage of ATP without increasing propidium iodide uptake. This was accompanied by reduced metabolic activity and loss of survivability. Proteomic analysis revealed decreased expression of some ribosomal-associated proteins. CBD exhibited antioxidant activity by reducing intracellular ROS levels in a dose-dependent manner. The antibacterial effect was neutralized by the free radical scavenger α-tocopherol, suggesting the involvement of radicals in executing the antibacterial effect. Importantly, CBD not only prevented the biofilm formation of G. vaginalis but also reduced the metabolic activity and biofilm biomass of preformed, mature biofilms. Real-time PCR analysis of G. vaginalis treated with CBD for 6 h showed an increase in the expression of biofilm-associated genes, suggesting that the antibiofilm activity of CBD is mainly due to its antibacterial effect. CBD did not alter the ability of G. vaginalis to adhere to HeLa cervical carcinoma cells and CBD-treated bacteria were still phagocytosed by RAW264.7 macrophages. 

Conclusions: Our study shows that CBD exhibits antibacterial and antibiofilm activities against G. vaginalis clinical isolates and is thus a potential drug for the treatment of vaginosis caused by this bacterium.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40001381/

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/14/2/136

Association of Financial Wellness with Patterns of Medical Cannabis Use and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Cancer

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Objective: Despite increasing use of medical cannabis to manage cancer-related symptoms, U.S. payers do not reimburse medical cannabis, leaving patients responsible for all associated costs. We assessed how self-reported financial well-being is associated with patterns of cannabis consumption, out-of-pocket costs, and impact on symptoms in patients with cancer.

Method: From December 2021 to January 2022, we surveyed patients with cancer enrolled in the Minnesota Medical Cannabis Program. The mailed survey included cancer history, cannabis use history, symptom changes and sociodemographic questions including income and perceived financial wellness. We conducted descriptive analyses.

Results: Of 797 eligible adults, 220 (28%) responded to the survey. Two hundred eleven answered a question about current household income as living comfortably (LC, 45%; n = 95) or not living comfortably (NLC, 55%; n = 116). The NLC group reported lower incomes (47% vs 8% with annual incomes <$50,000) and were typically younger, unmarried, unemployed, or disabled. NLC group purchased more vaporizers (48% vs 27%), used products high in THC (92% vs 82%), and reported higher cannabis costs (40% vs 21% spending $200+/month). The NLC group more often stopped or used cannabis less frequently than they would like (54% versus 32%), frequently citing costs as a reason (85% vs 39%). Both NLC and LC groups typically used cannabis daily and reported a high degree of symptom improvement.

Conclusions: Patients with cancer using cannabis report significant improvements in cancer-related symptoms. High out-of-pocket costs for cannabis may be especially burdensome among those already financially struggling, raising questions about affordability of and equitable access to this therapy.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39968481/

https://publications.sciences.ucf.edu/cannabis/index.php/Cannabis/article/view/243

Combination of Cannabidiol with Cisplatin or Paclitaxel Analysis Using the Chou-Talalay Method and Chemo-Sensitization Evaluation in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Cells

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background/Objectives: Cannabidiol (CBD) is known for its anti-cancer properties in preclinical models and is increasingly used alongside conventional chemotherapy in cancer treatment. This study aims to evaluate the anti-cancer activity of CBD from Lebanese Cannabis sativa as a monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin or paclitaxel on human ovarian adenocarcinoma cells. 

Methods: Cytotoxicity of CBD was tested on OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3 cell lines using the MTS assay. The Chou-Talalay method and CompuSyn software were used to determine the combination indices (CIs) for predicting interactions between CBD and chemotherapeutic agents. CBD showed dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition at 72 h with comparable IC50 values for both cell lines. 

Results: The combination of CBD with cisplatin or paclitaxel showed significant antagonistic interaction in SK-OV-3 cells (CI > 1), but mild synergism (CI < 1) at high growth inhibition rates (95% and 97%) was observed in SK-OV-3 cells with CBD/cisplatin. Pure antagonism was found in OVCAR-3 cells with CBD/cisplatin. Priming SK-OV-3 cells with CBD reduced the IC50 values of both drugs significantly, with a similar effect seen when cells were primed with cisplatin or paclitaxel before CBD treatment. 

Conclusions: Integrating CBD with chemotherapy could improve cancer therapy and address drug resistance. Sequential administration of CBD and chemotherapeutic agents is more beneficial than simultaneous administration. Further in vivo studies are necessary to validate these findings and understand CBD’s interactions with other drugs fully.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40002932/

“This study explores the anti-cancer activity of CBD, as monotherapy and in combination with two commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, cisplatin and paclitaxel, against platinum-resistant ovarian cancer OVCAR-3 and SK-OV-3 cell lines.

CBD monotherapy showed promising and significant tumor growth inhibitory effect against both cell lines. The current study demonstrated that the combination of CBD with cisplatin or paclitaxel displayed diminished inhibition of cell proliferation as compared to individual treatment.

CBD and paclitaxel exhibited an antagonistic interaction on all effect levels. In contrast, although antagonism was prominent over most of the inhibitory effect levels with concurrent treatment of CBD and cisplatin, synergy was detected at the highest effect levels, highlighting the potential benefit of combining the two agents at specific concentrations. However, priming with CBD, cisplatin, or paclitaxel has shown significant sensitization of SK-OV-3 cells to the subsequent treatment, stressing the importance of sequential, rather than simultaneous, administration of the drugs.

These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing current therapeutic options when integrating CBD with conventional chemotherapy by adopting priming regimens to circumvent the antagonism observed during co-treatment. Further investigations are necessary to validate the current results in vivo and elucidate the mechanism underlying the interaction of CBD with various anticancer drugs.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/2/520

Tailored Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Potential Cannabinoid Carriers for Anti-Cancer Treatment

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“We present a novel, multicomponent nanoparticulate carrier system based on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with a designed hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance based on oleic acid and TWEEN 80 to incorporate hydrophobic cannabinoids-cannabigerol and cannabidiol-as well as the hydrophilic anthracycline drug epirubicin, forming a conjugate anticancer system.

Additionally, the superparamagnetic iron oxide-based nanoparticles formed the core of the system, thus providing it with magnetic hyperthermia capabilities with a specific absorption rate comparable to the corresponding systems in the literature. The interaction of the conjugate with the cell membrane was studied using the Langmuir monolayers at the air/water interface formed of selected lipids modeling the healthy and cancerous cell membranes.

Finally, cytotoxicity tests were carried out against the SKOV-3 cell line in vitro. A synergistic effect was observed when both the cannabinoid and epirubicin were present in the conjugate, as compared to the cannabinoid or epirubicin alone, making our system advantageous for further development for tentative therapeutic use.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40001533/

https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/15/2/230

Extraction, GC-MS analysis, cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory and anticancer potential of Cannabis sativa female flower; in vitro, in vivo and in silico

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“This work examines the anticancer activity, the anti-inflammatory nature, and the cytotoxicity of the ethanol extract obtained from the female flowers of Cannabis sativa L using molecular methods in vitro, animal testing in vivo, as well as computational methods and simulations in silico.

From the GC-MS analysis, the following bioactive compounds were found: cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and humulene. The antiproliferative activities of the extract were determined on HeLa cells by using MTT, Crystal Violet, and Trypan Blue assays with an IC50 value suggesting 51%-77.6% lethality.

The bioinformatics analysis of molecular docking proved significant ligand-protein interactions of CBD, THC, and humulene with cancer-associated proteins such as PD-1/PD-L1, TNF-α, and MMP-9. In vivo, breast cancer was first established in female Sprague-Dawley rats with 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) then treated with cannabinoids either singularly or in combination.

Detailed treatment demonstrated that the use of the three cannabinoids simultaneously yielded the best anticancer and anti-inflammatory outcomes together with the best tumor reduction. The concentration of serum biomarkers of inflammation and tumor progression was substantially reduced in treated groups compared to the control group, which proves the synergistic effects of these cannabinoids in breast cancer therapy.

This study emphasizes the importance of medical Cannabis sativa derivatives in cancer treatment.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40008130/

“Cancer still has no known treatment, and research is being conducted to create lead compounds and precursors that could be used as anticancer medications for 1 day. The goal of this study was to identify natural compounds with anticancer properties.

The MTT assay showed that cannabinoids retain anti-proliferative, anti-invasion, and apoptotic effects. IC50 upregulates 51%–77.6% of carcinoma cell death. The synergistic effects of cannabidiol, tetrahydrocannabinol, and humulene significantly suppressed PD-1/PD-L1 expression and oxidative stress, suggesting a possible approach for targeting breast cancer resistance. The greatest effect was obtained when all three compounds were combined, suggesting that the immunosuppressive and oxidative stress-modulatory effects of the compounds occurred synergistically.

Herein, we report comprehensive findings that may be helpful in designing new combinatory therapeutic strategies for breast cancer via the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and oxidative stress markers. Further studies and trials are needed to identify more cannabinoid-based treatments and to combine pharmacological and cannabinoid drugs to gain remarkable effects against various cancer treatments.”

“Cannabis sativa is the oldest cultivated plant and contains a lot of naturally useful components used by humans. It is used as a source of fuel, food, herbal body care products, and medicines to cure different diseases. It is a plant of the Cannabaceae family. “

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1546062/full

Mechanisms of Cell Death Induced by Cannabidiol Against Tumor Cells: A Review of Preclinical Studies

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Commonly known as marijuana or hemp, Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae), contains numerous active compounds, particularly cannabinoids, which have been extensively studied for their biological activities. Among these, cannabidiol (CBD) stands out for its therapeutic potential, especially given its non-psychotropic effects.

This review evaluates the antitumor properties of CBD, highlighting its various mechanisms of action, including the induction of apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis.

By synthesizing findings from in vitro studies on the cell death mechanisms and signaling pathways activated by CBD in various human tumor cell lines, this literature review emphasizes the therapeutic promise of this natural antineoplastic agent. We conducted a comprehensive search of articles in PubMed, Scopus, Springer, Medline, Lilacs, and Scielo databases from 1984 to February 2022.

Of the forty-three articles included, the majority (68.18%) reported that CBD activates apoptosis, while 18.18% observed simultaneous apoptosis and autophagy, 9.09% focused on autophagy alone, and 4.54% indicated necrosis. The antitumor effects of CBD appear to be mediated by transient receptor potential cation channels (TRPVs) in endometrial cancer, glioma, bladder cancer, and myeloma, with TRPV1, TRPV2, and TRPV4 playing key roles in activating apoptosis.

This knowledge paves the way for innovative therapeutic strategies that may enhance cancer treatment outcomes while minimizing the toxicity and side effects associated with conventional therapies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40006844/

“This review underscores the therapeutic potential of CBD as a promising antitumor agent across various cancer types, particularly through its interaction with transient receptor potential cation channels (TRPVs) and endocannabinoid CB receptors.

Our findings suggest that CBD primarily activates the apoptosis pathway while also engaging autophagy and necrosis, offering a multifaceted strategy for inducing cancer cell death. Moreover, the potential for combination therapies that integrate CBD with established chemotherapeutics highlights the importance of further research to investigate these synergies and optimize therapeutic regimens.

Although regulatory challenges persist, robust scientific evidence demonstrating CBD’s safety and efficacy of CBD will be crucial for advancing its clinical application in oncology.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/4/585