Category Archives: Cancer

Molecular Targets of Minor Cannabinoids in Breast Cancer: In Silico and In Vitro Studies

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Breast cancer therapy has been facing remarkable changes. Classic treatments are now combined with other therapies to improve efficacy and surpass resistance. Indeed, the emergence of resistance demands the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Due to key estrogen signaling, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer treatment has always been focused on aromatase inhibition and ER modulation. Lately, the effects of phytocannabinoids, mainly Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), have been evaluated in different cancers, including breast. However, Cannabis sativa contains more than 120 phytocannabinoids less researched and understood.

Methods: Here, we evaluated, both in silico and in vitro, the ability of 129 phytocannabinoids to modulate important molecular targets in ER+ breast cancer: aromatase, ER, and androgen receptor (AR).

Results: In silico results suggested that some cannabinoids may inhibit aromatase and act as ERα antagonists. Nine selected cannabinoids showed, in vitro, potential to act either as ER antagonists with inverse agonist properties, or as ER agonists. Moreover, these cannabinoids were considered as weak aromatase inhibitors and AR antagonists with inverse agonist action.

Conclusions: Overall, we present, for the first time, a comprehensive analysis of the actions of the phytocannabinoids in targets of ER+ breast tumors, pointing out their therapeutic potential in cancer and in other diseases.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39338407/

“From the best of our knowledge, this is the first study exploring the molecular targets of minor cannabinoids and, together with previous studies, it reinforces the importance and therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in breast cancer, paving the way for novel and alternative therapeutic approaches and highlighting the medicinal potential of Cannabis.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/17/9/1245

Exploring the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in cancer by modulating signaling pathways and addressing clinical challenges

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“For centuries, cannabinoids have been utilized for their medicinal properties, particularly in Asian and South-Asian countries. Cannabis plants, known for their psychoactive and non-psychoactive potential, were historically used for spiritual and remedial healing. However, as cannabis became predominantly a recreational drug, it faced prohibition.

Recently, the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids has sparked renewed research interest, extending their use to various medical conditions, including cancer. This review aims to highlight current data on the involvement of cannabinoids in cancer signaling pathways, emphasizing their potential in cancer therapy and the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms.

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed/MedLine, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. The search focused on peer-reviewed articles, review articles, and clinical trials discussing the anticancer properties of cannabinoids. Inclusion criteria included studies in English on the mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy of cannabinoids in cancer.

Cannabinoids, including Δ9-THC, CBD, and CBG, exhibit significant anticancer activities such as apoptosis induction, autophagy stimulation, cell cycle arrest, anti-proliferation, anti-angiogenesis, and metastasis inhibition. Clinical trials have demonstrated cannabinoids’ efficacy in tumor regression and health improvement in palliative care. However, challenges such as variability in cannabinoid composition, psychoactive effects, regulatory barriers, and lack of standardized dosing remain.

Cannabinoids show promising potential as anticancer agents through various mechanisms. Further large-scale, randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings and establish standardized therapeutic protocols. Future research should focus on elucidating detailed mechanisms, optimizing dosing, and exploring cannabinoids as primary chemotherapeutic agents.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39331301/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12672-024-01356-8

“Cannabis Compounds Show ‘Promising Potential As Anticancer Agents’”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ajherrington/2024/10/08/cannabis-compounds-show-promising-potential-as-anti-cancer-agents/

The Efficacy of Cannabis in Oncology Patient Care and Its Anti-Tumor Effects

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“As the legalization of medical cannabis expands across several countries, interest in its potential advantages among cancer patients and caregivers is burgeoning. However, patients seeking to integrate cannabis into their treatment often encounter frustration when their oncologists lack adequate information to offer guidance. This knowledge gap is exacerbated by the scarcity of published literature on the benefits of medical cannabis, leaving oncologists reliant on evidence-based data disheartened. This comprehensive narrative article, tailored for both clinicians and patients, endeavors to bridge these informational voids. It synthesizes cannabis history, pharmacology, and physiology and focuses on addressing various symptoms prevalent in cancer care, including insomnia, nausea and vomiting, appetite issues, pain management, and potential anti-cancer effects. Furthermore, by delving into the potential mechanisms of action and exploring their relevance in cancer treatment, this article aims to shed light on the potential benefits and effects of cannabis in oncology.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39199679/

“Cancer is a major disease and a leading cause of death worldwide. Improving treatment and management strategies for cancer is critical. This article explores cannabis and its pharmacological properties as a promising tool in cancer care, especially in easing symptoms like appetite loss, pain, nausea, vomiting, and insomnia. Moreover, it examines the anti-tumor properties of cannabis, highlighting that, although some evidence suggests benefits, more research is necessary to confirm these effects. The article addresses the evidence concerning the clinical challenges of using cannabis, such as its psychoactive effects, and potential side effects. The article aims to clarify the current understanding of cannabis use in cancer care, helping healthcare professionals and patients make better-informed decisions and improve treatment outcomes.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/16/16/2909

Cannabinoid combination targets NOTCH1-mutated T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia through the integrated stress response pathway

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“In T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), more than 50% of cases display autoactivation of Notch1 signaling, leading to oncogenic transformation.

We have previously identified a specific chemovar of Cannabis that induces apoptosis by preventing Notch1 maturation in leukemia cells. Here, we isolated three cannabinoids from this chemovar that synergistically mimic the effects of the whole extract. Two were previously known, cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabidivarin (CBDV), whereas the third cannabinoid, which we termed 331-18A, was identified and fully characterized in this study.

We demonstrated that these cannabinoids act through cannabinoid receptor type 2 and TRPV1 to activate the integrated stress response pathway by depleting intracellular Ca2+. This is followed by increased mRNA and protein expression of ATF4, CHOP, and CHAC1, which is hindered by inhibiting the upstream initiation factor eIF2α. The increased abundance of CHAC1 prevents Notch1 maturation, thereby reducing the levels of the active Notch1 intracellular domain, and consequently decreasing cell viability and increasing apoptosis.

Treatment with the three isolated molecules resulted in reduced tumor size and weight in vivo and slowed leukemia progression in mice models. Altogether, this study elucidated the mechanism of action of three distinct cannabinoids in modulating the Notch1 pathway, and constitutes an important step in the establishment of a new therapy for treating NOTCH1-mutated diseases and cancers such as T-ALL.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39258755/

https://elifesciences.org/articles/90854

Inhibition of Myeloma Cell Function by Cannabinoid-Enriched Product Associated With Regulation of Telomere and TP53

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Multiple myeloma is a hematological cancer caused by the uncontrolled proliferation of abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow, leading to excessive immunoglobulin production. Our study aimed to examine the anticancer properties of BRF1A, a cannabinoid (CBD)-enriched product, on 2 myeloma cell lines: U266 and ARH-7.

We treated U266 and ARH-77 myeloma cells with varying doses of BRF1A and measured the production of IgE and IgG antibodies using ELISA. Cell viability was assessed using trypan blue and CCK-8 assays. We measured the expression of genes related to the production of IgE and IgG antibodies, IgEH, and IgGH. We determined its effect on the expression of telomerase and its phosphorylated form as an indicator of telomere stabilization. Furthermore, we determined its effect on other cancer-related targets such as NF-ĸB, c-Myc, and TP53 in U266 cells using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blotting.

BRF1A reduced myeloma cell IgE and IgG production in a time and dose-dependent manner. It also suppressed the expression of p-IκBα, p-NFκB (p65), and total NFκB protein, as well as XBP1u and XBP1s. It increased the gene and protein expression of telomere and hTERT and significantly increased cancer suppressor TP53 gene and p53 protein expression. Additionally, BRF1A decreased the c-Myc gene and protein expression.

Our study has shown that a CBD-enriched product can reduce the growth of myeloma cells by suppressing the critical functions of IgE- and IgG-producing cells. This study could help bridge the gap in understanding how cannabinoid-containing products affect cancer, aging, telomere, and cancer-suppressor gene activity.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39256983/

Mechanistic Insights into the Impact of WIN 55, 212-2, a Synthetic Cannabinoid, on Adhesion Molecules PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin in HeLa Cells: Implications on Cancer Processes

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“The endocannabinoid (eCB) system comprises endogenous ligands, cannabinoid receptors (CBRs) and proteins involved in their regulation; its alteration leads to many diseases including cancer. Thus, becomes a therapeutic target for synthetic cannabinoids aimed to control cancer cell proliferation, migration, adhesion and invasion. However, little is known about adhesion molecules regulation through CBRs activation.

Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a CB1/CB2 agonist, WIN-55, 212-2 (WIN), on the regulation of adhesion molecules PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin in HeLa cells. CBRs expression was evaluated by immunofluorescence staining in HeLa cells. Cell viability by MTT, cell adhesion by crystal violet, adhesion molecules expression and location by Western blot and immunofluorescence staining assays were assessed on cells treated with different WIN concentrations.

Results show that CB1, CB2 and GPR55 receptors are expressed in HeLa cells. Additionally, biphasic effects were observed in their metabolic activity and adhesive properties: low WIN concentrations significantly increased them, in contrast, were decreased at high ones as compared to controls (p < 0.0001), demonstrating that WIN elicits opposite effects depending on the concentration and exposure time. PECAM-1 was detected in cytoplasm, membrane and perinuclear region of HeLa cells, whereas VE-cadherin had a nuclear distribution. There were not significant differences in PECAM-1 and VE-cadherin expression and location, suggesting that WIN does not modulate these proteins.

These findings support the potential use of WIN due to its anticancer properties without dysregulating adhesion molecules. WIN possible contribution to inhibit cancer progression should be further investigated.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39228102/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15376516.2024.2399132

Cannabidiol enhances Atezolizumab efficacy by upregulating PD-L1 expression via the cGAS-STING pathway in triple-negative breast cancer cells

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“The treatment of patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) relies on cytotoxic therapy. Currently, atezolizumab and chemotherapy can be combined in patients with TNBC. However, this approach is not effective for all patients with low reactivity to atezolizumab. As there is a lack of alternative treatment options, new anti-cancer drugs are urgently needed to enhance atezolizumab reactivity against TNBC. Recent strategies have focused on regulating the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or enhancing immune response activation by combining anti-cancer drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Cannabidiol (CBD), a cannabinoid component derived from the cannabis plant, has been reported to have anti-cancer therapeutic potential because of its capacity to induce apoptotic cell death in tumor cells while avoiding cytotoxicity in normal cells.

Previous studies have demonstrated the effects of CBD on apoptosis in various cancer cell types. However, the potential role of CBD as an immune modulator in the regulation of PD-L1 expression and anti-cancer immune responses remains to be explored.

In this study, we found that CBD stimulated PD-L1 expression in TNBC cells, which significantly induced the CBD-mediated cGAS-STING pathway activation. Taken together, we demonstrated that the combination of CBD and anti-PD-L1 antibody enhances the anti-cancer immune response in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Our findings identified the mechanism of PD-L1 regulation by CBD in TNBC cells and suggested that CBD could be a potential candidate for the development of new combinatorial strategies with ICIs in TNBC patients.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39226389/

https://aacrjournals.org/cancerimmunolres/article/doi/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-23-0902/747763/Cannabidiol-enhances-Atezolizumab-efficacy-by

Cannabidiol exhibits potent anti-cancer activity against gemcitabine-resistant cholangiocarcinoma via ER-stress induction in vitro and in vivo

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Failure of treatment with gemcitabine in most cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients is due to drug resistance. The therapeutic potential of natural plant secondary compounds with minimal toxicity, such as cannabidiol (CBD), is a promising line of investigation in gemcitabine-resistant CCA. We aim to investigate the effects of CBD on gemcitabine-resistant CCA (KKU-213BGemR) cells in vitro and in vivo.

Materials: In vitro, cell proliferation, colony formation, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest were assessed using MTT assay, clonogenicity assay and flow cytometry. The effect of CBD on ROS production was evaluated using the DCFH-DA fluorescent probe. The mechanism exerted by CBD on ER stress-associated apoptosis was investigated by western blot analysis. A gemcitabine-resistant CCA xenograft model was also used and the expression of PCNA and CHOP were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis.

Results: The IC50 values of CBD for KKU-213BGemR cells ranged from 19.66 to 21.05 µM. For a non-cancerous immortalized fibroblast cell line, relevant values were 18.29 to 19.21 µM. CBD suppressed colony formation by KKU-213BGemR cells in a dose-dependent manner in the range of 10 to 30 µM. CBD at 30 µM significantly increased apoptosis at early (16.37%) (P = 0.0024) and late (1.8%) stages (P < 0.0001), for a total of 18.17% apoptosis (P = 0.0017), in part by increasing ROS production (P < 0.0001). Multiphase cell cycle arrest significantly increased at G0/G1 with CBD 10 and 20 µM (P = 0.004 and P = 0.017), and at G2/M with CBD 30 µM (P = 0.005). CBD treatment resulted in increased expression of ER stress-associated apoptosis proteins, including p-PERK, BiP, ATF4, CHOP, BAX, and cytochrome c. In xenografted mouse, CBD significantly suppressed tumors at 10 and 40 mg/kg·Bw (P = 0.0007 and P = 0.0278, respectively), which was supported by an increase in CHOP, but a decrease in PCNA expression in tumor tissues (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The results suggest that CBD exhibits potent anti-cancer activity against gemcitabine-resistant CCA in vitro and in vivo, in part via ER stress-mediated mechanisms. These results indicate that clinical explorative use of CBD on gemcitabine-resistant CCA patients is warranted.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39215312/

“This study suggests that CBD may be a valuable therapeutic option for gemcitabine-resistant CCA, as it inhibits the growth of these resistant cells, induces apoptosis and disrupts the cell cycle. These results are in line with established oncology research and emphasize the potential of CBD as a multifaceted therapeutic agent against gemcitabine resistance in CCA.”

https://bmccomplementmedtherapies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12906-024-04610-2

A Bioinformatic Analysis Predicts That Cannabidiol Could Function as a Potential Inhibitor of the MAPK Pathway in Colorectal Cancer

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Colorectal cancer (CRC), found in the intestinal tract, is initiated and progresses through various mechanisms, including the dysregulation of signaling pathways. Several signaling pathways, such as EGFR and MAPK, involved in cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis, are often dysregulated in CRC.

Although cannabidiol (CBD) has previously induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in vitro in CRC cell lines, its effects on signaling pathways have not yet been determined. An in silico analysis was used here to assess partner proteins that can bind to CBD, and docking simulations were used to predict precisely where CBD would bind to these selected proteins. A survey of the current literature was used to hypothesize the effect of CBD binding on such proteins.

The results predict that CBD could interact with EGFR, RAS/RAF isoforms, MEK1/2, and ERK1/2. The predicted CBD-induced inhibition might be due to CBD binding to the ATP binding site of the target proteins. This prevents the required phosphoryl transfer to activate substrate proteins and/or CBD binding to the DFG motif from taking place, thus reducing catalytic activity.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39194723/

“This in silico study predicts that CBD could play a pivotal role in inhibiting the EGFR and MAPK pathways since almost all the proteins involved in this pathway interact with CBD. The most notable interactions occur between CBD and EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and MEK1, as reflected by docking scores and being the most critically mutated or dysregulated proteins in colorectal cancer. CBD is proposed to act as an inhibitor of these proteins mainly by binding to the ATP catalytic binding site, which prevents phosphotransfer and the subsequent downstream activation of the substrate proteins. Secondly, CBD can act by binding to the DFG, which is adjacent to the hydrophobic pocket. The catalytic activity of this target protein is inhibited by this mechanism. Since the effect of CBD on these proteins has not yet been investigated, future studies should aim to determine if CBD indeed binds to these predicted target sites in these proteins and if the expected inhibitory effect occurs. Furthermore, in vitro phosphorylation studies on the selected proteins may determine if the phosphorylation of these proteins is affected by CBD treatment. In conclusion, CBD is predicted to interact with multiple role-players in the EGFR and MAPK pathways, potentially inhibiting these pathways and proteins.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/46/8/506

Cannabinoids and triple-negative breast cancer treatment

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for about 10-20% of all breast cancer cases and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Until recently, treatment options for TNBC were limited to chemotherapy. A new successful systemic treatment is immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, but new tumor-specific biomarkers are needed to improve patient outcomes.

Cannabinoids show antitumor activity in most preclinical studies in TNBC models and do not appear to have adverse effects on chemotherapy.

Clinical data are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety in humans. Importantly, the endocannabinoid system is linked to the immune system and immunosuppression. Therefore, cannabinoid receptors could be a potential biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy or a novel mechanism to reverse resistance to immunotherapy. In this article, we provide an overview of the currently available information on how cannabinoids may influence standard therapy in TNBC.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39176080/

“Selective CB2R agonists and antagonists are needed to develop potential anti-cancer drugs that target the endocannabinoid system,”

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1386548/full