Category Archives: Obesity

The endocannabinoid system : a new target for the regulation of energy balance and metabolism.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Recent studies have provided evidence that the endocannabinoid (EC) system has very significant effects on energy balance and metabolism through the central control of appetite and by affecting peripheral metabolism. Endocannabinoids are endogenous phospholipid derivatives which bind and activate cannabinoid receptors type 1 and type 2 (CB1 and CB2 receptors). The CB1 receptor, a G-protein coupled receptor, is believed to be responsible for the majority of the central effects of endocannaboids on appetite. Chronic positive energy balance and obesity have been associated with an overactivation of the endocannaboid system which has been suggested to contribute to the development of abdominal obesity and to associated metabolic abnormalities which increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Animal studies had shown that stimulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor with endocannaboids such as anandamide could induce first an increase in food intake leading to body weight gain. Furthermore, an exciting development in this field has been the discovery of CB1 receptors in many peripheral tissues, including key organs involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism such as the adipose tissue and liver. Thus, blocking CB1 receptors located in the liver and adipose tissue could have an additional impact on the metabolic risk profile beyond what could be explained by the reduction in food intake and the related body weight loss. Preclinical studies have shown that rimonabant, the first CB1-receptor blocker to be available in clinical practice, could not only induce a reduction in food intake, but could also produce body weight loss beyond what could be explained by its effect on food intake. Thus, the evidence from preclinical studies have suggested that CB1 blockade could represent a relevant approach to reduce food intake, to induce body weight loss, and, most importantly, to “fix” the dysmetabolic state of viscerally obese patients at increased cardiometabolic risk.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17667864

[Endocannabinoid system and energy metabolism: physiology and pathophysiology].

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The ability of the endocannabinoid system to control appetite, food intake and energy balance has recently received great attention, particularly in the light of the different modes of action underlying these functions. The endocannabinoid system modulates rewarding properties of food by acting at specific mesolimbic areas in the brain. In the hypothalamus, CB1 receptor and endocannabinoids are integrated components of the networks controlling appetite and food intake. Interestingly, the endocannabinoid system has recently been shown to control several metabolic functions by acting on peripheral tissues, such as adipocytes, hepatocytes, the skeletal muscles and the endocrine pancreas. The relevance of the system is further strengthened by the notion that visceral obesity seems to be a condition in which an overactivation of the endocannabinoid system occurs, therefore drugs interfering with this overactivation by blocking CB1 receptor are considered as valuable candidates for the treatment of obesity and related cardiometabolic risk factors.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18773754

The endocannabinoid system, eating behavior and energy homeostasis: the end or a new beginning?

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The endocannabinoid system (ECS) consists of two receptors (CB(1) and CB(2)), several endogenous ligands (primarily anandamide and 2-AG), and over a dozen ligand-metabolizing enzymes. The ECS regulates many aspects of embryological development and homeostasis, including neuroprotection and neural plasticity, immunity and inflammation, apoptosis and carcinogenesis, pain and emotional memory, and the focus of this review: hunger, feeding, and metabolism. This mini-review summarizes the main findings that supported the clinical use of CB1 antagonists/inverse agonists, the clinical concerns that have emerged, and the possible future of cannabinoid-based therapy of obesity and related diseases. The ECS controls energy balance and lipid metabolism centrally (in the hypothalamus and mesolimbic pathways) and peripherally (in adipocytes, liver, skeletal muscle and pancreatic islet cells), acting through numerous anorexigenic and orexigenic pathways. Obese people seem to display an increased endocannabinoid tone, driving CB(1) receptor in a feed-forward dysfunction. Several CB(1) antagonists/inverse agonists have been developed for the treatment of obesity. Although these drugs were found to be efficacious at reducing food intake as well as abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors, they resulted in adverse psychiatric effects that limited their use and finally led to the end of the clinical use of systemic CB(1) ligands with significant inverse agonist activity for complicated obesity. However, the existence of alternatives such as CB(1) partial agonists, neutral antagonists, antagonists restricted to the periphery, allosteric modulators and other potential targets within the ECS indicate that a cannabinoid-based therapy for the management of obesity and its associated cardiometabolic sequelae should remain open for consideration.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20347862

Cannabinoid receptors as therapeutic targets for obesity and metabolic diseases.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“One of the most interesting pharmacological targets proposed in the past ten years for fighting obesity and related metabolic disorders is the endocannabinoid system. The role of the endocannabinoid system is crucial in regulating the rewarding properties of food, in controlling energy balance by acting at the hypothalamic circuitries involved in food intake, and in peripheral metabolism by influencing adipocytes, hepatocytes, myocytes and pancreatic endocrine cells. Obesity seems to be a condition associated with a pathological overactivation of the endocannabinoid system; therefore, restoring a normal endocannabinoid tone by antagonizing the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB(1)) could help arrest both the development and the maintenance of obesity.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17027338

How many sites of action for endocannabinoids to control energy metabolism?

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The promising results obtained by clinical trials using Rimonabant to tackle visceral obesity and related disorders recently promoted a remarkable impulse to carry out detailed investigations into the mechanisms of action of endocannabinoids in regulating food intake and energy metabolism. The endocannabinoid system has been known for many years to play an important role in the modulation of the neuronal pathways mediating the rewarding properties of food. However, in the last few years, with the advanced understanding of the crucial role of the hypothalamic neuronal network in the regulation of appetite, several studies have also directed attention to the orexigenic role of the endocannabinoid system, substantiating the well known appetite stimulating properties of derivatives of Cannabis sativa. Furthermore, the last 2 years have seen a number of relevant publications emphasizing the role of endocannabinoids as significant players in various peripheral metabolic processes. To date, the roles of the endocannabinoid system in influencing energy metabolism have proved to be more complex than was formerly believed. However, the diverse ability to modulate both central and peripheral processes highlights the pivotal involvement of the endocannabinoid system in the control of metabolic processes. This review describes the roles of endocannabinoids and the cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1) in the control of energy balance.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16570104

Contribution of CB1 blockade to the management of high-risk abdominal obesity.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The worldwide increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes represents a tremendous challenge for our healthcare system, especially if we consider that this phenomenon is largely explained by the epidemic of obesity. However, despite the well-recognized increased morbidity and mortality associated with an elevated body weight, there is now more and more evidence highlighting that abdominal adipose tissue is the fat depot that conveys the greatest risk of metabolic complications. This cluster of metabolic abnormalities has been referred to as the metabolic syndrome and this condition is largely the consequence of abdominal obesity, especially when accompanied by a high accumulation of visceral adipose tissue. This cluster of metabolic complications has also been found to be predictive of a substantially increased risk of coronary heart disease beyond the presence of traditional risk factors. Moreover, a moderate weight loss in initially abdominally obese patients is associated with a selective mobilization of visceral adipose tissue, leading to improvements in the metabolic risk profile predictive of a reduced risk of coronary heart disease and of type 2 diabetes. The recent discovery of the endocannabinoid-CB1 receptor system and of its impact on the regulation of energy metabolism represents a significant advance, which will help physicians target abdominal obesity and its related metabolic complications. In this regard, studies have shown that rimonabant therapy (the first developed CB1 blocker) could be useful for the management of clustering cardiovascular disease risk factors in high-risk abdominally obese patients through its effects not only on energy balance but also on adipose tissue metabolism. For instance, the presence of CB1 receptors in adipose tissue and the recently reported effect of rimonabant on adiponectin production by adipose cells may represent a key factor responsible for the weight loss-independent effect of this CB1 blocker on cardiometabolic risk variables.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16570106

Expression of the cannabinoid system in muscle: effects of a high-fat diet and CB1 receptor blockade

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The ECS (endocannabinoid system) plays an important role in the onset of obesity and metabolic disorders, implicating central and peripheral mechanisms predominantly via CB1 (cannabinoid type 1) receptors. CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist treatment improves cardiometabolic risk factors and insulin resistance. However, the relative contribution of peripheral organs to the net beneficial metabolic effects remains unclear. In the present study, we have identified the presence of the endocannabinoid signalling machinery in skeletal muscle and also investigated the impact of an HFD (high-fat diet) on lipid-metabolism-related genes and endocannabinoid-related proteins. Finally, we tested whether administration of the CB1 inverse agonist AM251 restored the alterations induced by the HFD. Rats were fed on either an STD (standard/low-fat diet) or an HFD for 10 weeks and then treated with AM251 (3 mg/kg of body weight per day) for 14 days. The accumulated caloric intake was progressively higher in rats fed on the HFD than the STD, resulting in a divergence in body weight gain. AM251 treatment reduced accumulated food/caloric intake and body weight gain, being more marked in rats fed on the HFD. CB2 (cannabinoid type 2) receptor and PPARα (peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α) gene expression was decreased in HFD-fed rats, whereas MAGL (monoglyceride lipase) gene expression was up-regulated. These data suggest an altered endocannabinoid signalling as a result of the HFD. AM251 treatment reduced CB2 receptor, PPARγ and AdipoR1 (adiponectin receptor 1) gene expression in STD-fed rats, but only partially normalized the CB2 receptor in HFD-fed rats. Protein levels corroborated gene expression results, but also showed a decrease in DAGL (diacylglycerol) β and DAGLα after AM251 treatment in STD- and HFD-fed rats respectively. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate a diet-sensitive ECS in skeletal muscle, suggesting that blockade of C1 receptors could work towards restoration of the metabolic adaption imposed by diet.”

“In the present study, we focused on skeletal muscles, which are an important tissue for glucose and fat oxidation, being an important site for insulin action [27]. However, despite the fact that AEA can modify the pathways regulating fatty acid oxidation in the skeletal muscle, probably via CB1 receptors, suggesting that CB1 receptor antagonism would have an important role in oxidative metabolism and energy regulation [28,29], there is still a general lack of clarity regarding the physiological functions and molecular mechanism implicated. In fact, there are almost no studies demonstrating the presence of endocannabinoid signalling proteins and their sensitivity to HFDs (high-fat diets). Therefore, in the present study, we have (i) investigated the presence of the endocannabinoid signalling machinery in skeletal muscle, (ii) analysed the impact of an HFD on lipid and glucose metabolism and endocannabinoid-related genes, and (iii) monitored the effects of the CB1 receptor inverse agonist AM251 during an STD (standard/low-fat diet) and HFD on the endocannabinoid machinery and the genes related to lipid oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle of rats. Among the many molecules involved in lipid metabolism of skeletal muscle, we evaluated changes in the gene and protein expression of relevant components of the ECS, such as the CB1 and CB2 receptors and some of the enzymes responsible for their synthesis.

The presence of the ECS in skeletal muscle

As a final note, the regulatory mechanisms may be different at rest and during exercise, may change as the exercise intensity increases, and this could be influential in endocannabinoid production [31,49]. It would be interesting to repeat this type of experiment combining exercise and diet in its original design. Regulation of skeletal muscle fat and glucose metabolism is clearly multifactorial, and different mechanisms may dominate in different conditions; besides, potential variations may exist between individuals in response to stimulating or blocking CB1 receptors. This could cause differences in response to treatment with CB1 receptor antagonists between different obese states. In conclusion, we have provided findings identifying important relevant players involved in the signalling pathways of CB1 receptor antagonism in skeletal muscle and determined the extent of changes in this system associated with either an HFD or CB1 receptor blockade.”

http://www.biochemj.org/bj/433/0175/bj4330175.htm

Obesity-dependent cannabinoid modulation of proliferation in adult neurogenic regions.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Endocannabinoid signalling participates in the control of neurogenesis, especially after brain insults. Obesity may explain alterations in physiology affecting neurogenesis, although it is unclear whether cannabinoid signalling may modulate neural proliferation in obese animals. Here we analyse the impact of obesity by using two approaches, a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% fat) and a standard/low-fat diet (STD, 10% fat), and the response to a subchronic treatment with the cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) inverse agonist AM251 (3 mg/kg) on cell proliferation of two relevant neurogenic regions, namely the subventricular zone in the striatal wall of the lateral ventricle (SVZ) and the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus (SGZ), and also in the hypothalamus given its role in energy metabolism. We found evidence of an interaction between diet-induced obesity and CB1 signalling in the regulation of cell proliferation. AM251 reduced caloric intake and body weight in obese rats, as well as corrected plasma levels of cholesterol and triglycerides. AM251 is shown, for the first time, to modulate cell proliferation in HFD-obese rats only. We observed an increase in the number of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine-labelled (BrdU+) cells in the SGZ, but a decrease in the number of BrdU+ cells in the SVZ and the hypothalamus of AM251-treated HFD rats. These BrdU+ cells expressed the neuron-specific βIII-tubulin. These results suggest that obesity may impact cell proliferation in the brain selectively, and provide support for a role of CB1 signalling regulation of neurogenesis in response to obesity.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21395869

Obesity, the Endocannabinoid System, and Bias Arising from Pharmaceutical Sponsorship

Posted on by
Reply

“Previous research has shown that academic physicians conflicted by funding from the pharmaceutical industry have corrupted evidence based medicine and helped enlarge the market for drugs. Physicians made pharmaceutical-friendly statements, engaged in disease mongering, and signed biased review articles ghost-authored by corporate employees.

 This paper tested the hypothesis that bias affects review articles regarding rimonabant, an anti-obesity drug that blocks the central cannabinoid receptor.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings are characteristic of bias that arises from financial conflicts of interest, and suggestive of ghostwriting by a common author. Resolutions for this scenario are proposed.

In summary, financial conflicts permeate the system and are by no means limited to corporations referenced in this article, such as Merck, Parke-Davis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Wyeth-Ayerst. On balance, pharmaceutical corporations do good work and aid in humanitarian efforts. For example Sanofi-Aventis provides artemisinin at cost to malaria-endemic countries. Nevertheless, ghost authorship and the corrupting effects of covert financial support must cease. Only three of eight rimonabant review articles disclosed corporate sponsorship; two authors specifically denied conflicts. Lack of disclosure prevents readers from judging the credibility of an author. Medical journals should require stronger author disclosure procedures, and universities should discipline academics who sign ghostwritten articles. This behavior should be regarded as unethical misconduct. More broadly, researchers with conflicts of interest should not be allowed to sit on guideline committees and regulatory boards. Corporate funding of CME programs and review articles should be abolished.

While this paper was under review, Merck halted taranabant RCTs, and Sanofi-Aventis removed rimonabant from the European market. The FDA rejected rimonabant after data submitted by Sanofi-Aventis revealed adverse effects in RIO trials that went unreported in RIO publications [86], including one death in a rimonabant-treated subject (ruled a suicide by the FDA, [86]) that did not appear in the pertinent publication [7]. Although the risk-benefit ratio of cannabinoid receptor blockade may preclude its use for chronic conditions such as obesity and drug or alcohol dependence, cannabinoid receptor blockade could serve in the treatment of acute endocannabinoid dysregulation, such as hepatic cirrhosis, hemorrhagic or endotoxic shock, cardiac reperfusion injury, and doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659447/

 

Rimonabant: a novel selective cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonist for treatment of obesity.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“PURPOSE:

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of rimonabant in the treatment of obesity and related metabolic factors are reviewed.

SUMMARY:

Discovery of the cannabinoid receptors has led to the development of rimonabant, a cannabinoid-1 (CB(1)) antagonist. Selective blockade of this receptor has been shown to lead to decreased appetite and food intake in animal models. Clinical studies have shown that rimonabant 20 mg once daily produces significant decreases in weight and waist circumference in obese human subjects and improves the lipid profile and glucose control. The frequency of metabolic syndrome also decreased significantly with rimonabant 20 mg daily. Limited data are available regarding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rimonabant. Preclinical data have demonstrated a long duration of action. As of yet, no drug-drug, drug-food, or drug-disease interactions have been identified with rimonabant. Adverse reactions occurred rarely, with nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, arthralgia, and back pain being the most common. Psychiatric disorders, including depression and anxiety, were the most common reasons for subjects to withdraw from rimonabant studies. Rimonabant has been shown to be safe for up to two years of treatment. Further research will clarify currently unknown areas, including pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and the drug’s role in standard therapy.

CONCLUSION:

Rimonabant, a selective CB(1) antagonist, is a novel treatment option for obese and overweight individuals. Significant weight loss, decrease in waist circumference, and improvements in lipid profile and glucose control have been shown in clinical trials of rimonabant.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17322160