Category Archives: Pain

Select terpenes from Cannabis sativa are antinociceptive in mouse models of post-operative pain and fibromyalgia via adenosine A2a receptors

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Terpenes from Cannabis show promise for pain management. Our lab found that the terpenes geraniol, linalool, β-caryophyllene, and α-humulene relieve chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy via Adenosine A2a receptors (A2aR). This suggests terpenes as potential non-opioid, non-cannabinoid therapeutics. In this study, we investigated post-operative and fibromyalgia pain, expanding potential terpene applications to different pain types.

Methods: Male and female CD-1 mice had their baseline mechanical sensitivity measured via von Frey filaments and underwent either paw incision surgery or reserpine-induced fibromyalgia (0.32 mg/kg, sc). After pain was established, the mice received 200 mg/kg ip of a terpene, and their mechanical sensitivity was measured over three hours. To determine the potential mechanism of action, mice were given the A2aR antagonist istradefylline (3.2 mg/kg, ip) 10 min before terpene, with mechanical sensitivity measured after. Hot plate pain testing was performed as a control.

Results: Terpene treatment caused time-dependent elevation of the mechanical thresholds of the mice from both pain models, strongest for geraniol, then linalool or α-humulene, indicating that these four terpenes are anti-nociceptive in post-surgical and fibromyalgia pain. Pretreatment with istradefylline blocked antinociception, suggesting the terpenes act via the A2aR in these pain models. Terpenes had no effect on hot plate latencies, ruling out non-specific motor effects.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the terpenes geraniol, linalool, β-caryophyllene, and α-humulene may be a viable medication for post-operative and fibromyalgia pain relief. Their mechanism of action via the A2aR furthers our knowledge of its importance in pain processing and as a target of terpene drugs.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39663308/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43440-024-00687-1

Evidence for therapeutic use of cannabidiol for nail-patella syndrome-induced pain in a real-world pilot study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Nail-patella syndrome (NPS) is a rare genetic disease characterized by dysplastic nails, patella abnormalities, skeletal malformation, and chronic pain. Although chronic pain in NPS is mainly due to bone and musculoskeletal symptoms, it can also result from neurological dysfunction. Conventional analgesics are often insufficient to relieve NPS-associated chronic pain.

Cannabinoids, which act on the serotonergic and/or noradrenergic pain systems, may therefore represent valuable non-psychoactive alternatives for managing pain in these patients. The effectiveness and safety of synthetic cannabidiol (CBD) for the management of NPS-associated pain was assessed using real-world data from a pilot cohort of patients with NPS who received a 3-month treatment with oral CBD.

The treatment (median dose of 900 mg/day) was associated with a significant reduction in pain intensity (mean score of 7.04 ± 0.24 at initiation versus 4.04 ± 0.38 at 3 months, N = 28, p < 0.0001), which correlated with changes in the peripheral concentration of noradrenaline (r = 0.705, 95% CI [0.44-0.86], p < 0.0001).

Health-related quality of life and other NPS-associated symptoms also improved in most patients. CBD treatment was well tolerated and no elevations in liver enzyme levels were reported. Synthetic CBD therefore appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for managing NPS-associated chronic pain.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39627343/

“Oral treatment with synthetic CBD was associated with a significant reduction in pain in most of the patients with NPS included in our study, and led to improvements in most of the NPS-associated symptoms analyzed. Hence, synthetic oral CBD appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for NPS-associated pain, and may be an alternative to conventional analgesics for managing chronic pain in this pathology.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-79239-9

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Pain, Stiffness, and Fatigue Reduction in Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis With Cannabinoid Use

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are autoimmune conditions that can progressively destroy joints, causing chronic, often debilitating pain, and drastically affecting the quality of life. Novel pharmaceutical remedies have recently been developed, which allow for better symptom management. However, the complex pain experienced is challenging to control fully, leading this patient population to seek alternative treatments.

Though cannabis has been legalized for medical use in most states in the United States, the safety and efficacy of its use in inflammatory arthritis have still not been satisfactorily established. We conducted a cross-sectional study on patients with RA and PsA who visited a rheumatology outpatient clinic from October 2019 to March 2020.

We conducted a brief, voluntary, and anonymous Qualtrics survey of specific questions regarding their use of cannabinoids and their forms, sources, methods, side effects, and perceived efficacy. The survey initially involved 302 eligible candidates, but only 290 patients completed it. Among them, 84.9% (n, 247) reported a diagnosis of RA, while 15.1% (n, 44) reported PsA. Demographically, 82.3% (n, 238) were female, and 17.7% (n, 52) were male, with mean ages of 57.1 years for RA and 56.2 years for PsA.

Around 16.95% (n=40) of RA and 11.63% (n=5) of PsA patients reported cannabinoid use, primarily inhaled for RA and topical/liquid for PsA.

Post-cannabis use, a significant decrease in pain scale was noted (mean difference: 2.267, p < 0.001), with improvements in stiffness, fatigue, and swelling reported. Side effects were minimal, and most patients were willing to discuss cannabinoid treatment with their physician (80.9% RA [n=199], 86.4% PsA [n=38]).

In conclusion, our study indicates that a notable portion of the patients with inflammatory arthritis including RA and PsA reported a history of use or ongoing cannabinoid use. Furthermore, the patients reported a short-term reduction of pain, fatigue, and swelling, though it is unclear if these findings are related to a placebo effect.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39583459/

“In summary, our study sheds light on the self-utilization and the reported effectiveness of cannabinoids in managing symptoms associated with RA and PsA. Our data indicate that the reduction in pain was statistically significant, suggesting cannabinoids may help alleviate the pain associated with these conditions.”

https://www.cureus.com/articles/204984-patient-reported-outcomes-of-pain-stiffness-and-fatigue-reduction-in-rheumatoid-and-psoriatic-arthritis-with-cannabinoid-use#!/

The Use of Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathy and Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Purpose: Peripheral neuropathies are commonly occurring conditions that are chronic and debilitating for patients. Established nonsurgical treatments have yielded mixed and patient-dependent results. Although cannabinoids have demonstrated efficacy as a treatment for central neuropathic pain, the therapeutic potential of cannabis-based medications for the management of peripheral neuropathic pain caused by nerve injury, trauma, and other noncompressive etiologies has yet to be definitively established. This study aims to determine whether cannabinoids are a potentially effective treatment for pain and symptoms associated with peripheral neuropathy.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted by two independent reviewers across PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and CINAHL to identify studies in accordance with the predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Information regarding study design, medication, dosage, effect on neuropathic pain, and other related outcomes was extracted. Meta-analysis of pain scores was performed for seven studies, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize other study findings as appropriate.

Results: Of the 927 studies identified, 14 randomized controlled trials were included. Thirteen of 14 studies (79%) observed a statistically significant decrease in neuropathic pain score following treatment with a cannabinoid. Meta-analysis yielded a mean difference of -0.67 [-0.89, -0.45]) on a 0-10 scale compared with placebo. Improvements in secondary outcomes such as sleep, sensory symptoms, and quality of life were observed.

Conclusions: Our analysis of the literature shows that cannabis-based medicines may be effective in treating the pain and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy. These findings suggest the applicability of cannabis-based medicines for peripheral neuropathy.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39570218/

https://www.jhandsurg.org/article/S0363-5023(24)00474-X/abstract

UK medical cannabis registry: A clinical outcome analysis of medical cannabis therapy in chronic pain patients with and without co-morbid sleep impairment

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Introduction: Chronic pain (CP) affects 35.0%-51.3% of the UK population, with 67%-88% reporting sleep disturbances. Cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) have shown therapeutic potential in managing CP. Evidence suggests poor sleep worsens pain perception; therefore, this study aimed to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following CBMP treatment in CP patients with and without co-morbid sleep impairment.

Methods: A prospective cohort study of CP patients from the UK Medical Cannabis Registry was conducted. Participants were separated by baseline single-item sleep quality scale (SQS) score into sleep impaired (SQS ≤3) and unimpaired (SQS ≥4) cohorts. The primary outcome assessed changes in PROMs from baseline to 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months. Participants completed the following: SQS, General Anxiety Disorder-7, EQ-5D-5L, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2. Significance was defined as p < 0.050.

Results: 1139 participants met the inclusion criteria (sleep impaired: n = 517, 45.4%; sleep unimpaired: n = 622, 54.61%). The sleep impaired cohort showed improvements in all PROMs at each follow-up (p < 0.010). The sleep unimpaired cohort showed similar results (p < 0.050), except in SQS and ED-5Q-5L: self-care and anxiety/depression scores (p > 0.050). However, the sleep impaired cohort observed greater improvements in BPI pain severity (p < 0.050) and SQS (p < 0.001) than the sleep unimpaired cohort at all follow-ups. 2817 adverse events were self-reported between both cohorts (p = 0.197).

Discussion: These findings align with literature that shows associated improvements in pain outcomes following CBMP administration. Sleep impaired individuals were more likely to experience greater pain severity improvements. However, this was not confirmed on multivariate logistic regression analysis and instead may be confounded by baseline pain severity.

Conclusion: Whilst these results show promise for the effects of CBMPs on CP, they must be examined within the limitations of the study design. These findings provide further evidence to support the design of subsequent randomized controlled trials to verify causality between CBMPs and pain outcomes.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39545361/

“The results of this observational cohort study suggest an association between CBMP treatment and improvement in pain-specific and HRQoL PROMs in CP patients with and without co-morbid sleep impairment. Notably, those with co-morbid sleep impairment were associated with greater improvements in BPI pain severity, SQS, and PGIC than those without. However, this finding was not confirmed on multivariate analysis. Reported sleep quality did improve across the cohort from baseline, and when present was also associated with improvements in pain severity, suggesting that the effects of CBMPs on sleep may provide additional benefits for individuals with chronic pain beyond affecting the transmission of nociceptive signals. At the onset of treatment, however, other variables may be better prognostic markers for response to CBMP treatment, such as severe pain or anxiety at baseline. With respect to clinical significance, 44.10% report an improvement in the sleep impaired cohort at 1-months, declining to 24.56% at 12-months. Despite being limited by its observational design, the present study can be used to inform future RCTs, in addition to current clinical practice.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papr.13438

Efficiency of cannabis and cannabidiol in managing chronic pain syndromes: A comprehensive narrative review

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Chronic pain affects up to 40% of adults, contributing to high medical expenses, the loss of productivity, reduced quality of life (QoL), and disability. Chronic pain requires detailed diagnostic assessment, treatment and rehabilitation, yet approx. 80% of patients report inadequate pain management.

As new treatment options are needed, we aimed to explore the effectiveness of medical cannabis-based products in managing chronic pain, with a particular focus on treatment patterns.

We searched the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases using keywords related to cannabinoids and chronic pain syndromes. In total, 3,954 articles were identified, and 74 studies involving 12,562 patients were included. The effectiveness of cannabis-based products varied across studies.

Cannabinoids were most effective in treating chronic secondary headache and orofacial pain, chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain, chronic secondary visceral pain, and chronic neuropathic pain. Properly qualifying patients is the first crucial step in managing chronic pain, considering pain characteristics, comorbidities and other treatment options.

Treatment should start with low doses of cannabinoids, which are then increased to achieve the desired therapeutic effect while minimizing adverse effects.This narrative review revealed significant gaps in the evidence regarding precise treatment patterns, particularly for the long-term maintenance treatment needed by patients with chronic pain.

Medical cannabis can be considered an option for carefully selected patients with chronic pain syndromes when other treatment options fail to achieve an adequate response, and when the potential benefits outweigh the risks. However, there is still a need for well-designed clinical research to establish the long-term efficacy and safety of cannabinoids.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39499191/

“Medical cannabis can be considered an option in carefully selected patients with chronic pain syndrome for the management of chronic pain when other treatment options fail to achieve an adequate response, and when potential benefits outweigh the risks. Patients with chronic secondary headache and orofacial pain, chronic secondary visceral pain, chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain, and chronic neuropathic pain can benefit more than other groups of patients experiencing chronic pain.”

https://dmp.umw.edu.pl/en/article/2024/61/5/765/

Cannabis-Based Phytocannabinoids: Overview, Mechanism of Action, Therapeutic Application, Production, and Affecting Environmental Factors

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“This review provides an overview of cannabis-based phytocannabinoids, focusing on their mechanisms of action, therapeutic applications, and production processes, along with the environmental factors that affect their quality and efficacy.

Phytocannabinoids such as THC (∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol), CBD (cannabidiol), CBG (cannabigerol), CBN (cannabinol), and CBC (cannabichromene) exhibit significant therapeutic potential in treating various physical and mental health conditions, including chronic pain, epilepsy, neurodegenerative diseases, skin disorders, and anxiety.

The cultivation of cannabis plays a crucial role in determining cannabinoid profiles, with indoor cultivation offering more control and consistency than outdoor methods. Environmental factors such as light, water, temperature, humidity, nutrient management, CO2, and the drying method used are key to optimizing cannabinoid content in inflorescences.

This review outlines the need for broader data transfer between the health industry and technological production, especially in terms of what concentration and cannabinoid ratios are effective in treatment. Such data transfer would provide cultivators with information on what environmental parameters should be manipulated to obtain the required final product.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39457041/

“Phytocannabinoids, including THC, CBD, CBG, CBN, and CBC, present broad therapeutic potential in a wide range of physical and mental conditions. They have shown efficacy in treating chronic pain, reducing seizure activity, slowing neurodegenerative processes, psoriasis, acne, loss of appetite, sleep disorders, and psychosis. Dose dependence was notable in most cases, and thus, this requires careful management.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/20/11258

Effect of cannabis use history on postoperative opioid utilization in lumbar fusion patients: an American retrospective study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: To examine the effect of cannabis use history on postoperative opioid utilization in patients undergoing one- to three-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease.

Overview of literature: Strategies to minimize dosing and chronic opioid use are needed for spine surgery given their widespread prescription for postsurgical pain management.

Methods: In this database study, medical coding was used to identify patients who had undergone one- to three-level lumbar fusions between 2012 and 2021. Propensity score matching was used to create two equal cohorts with respect to cannabis use history. Opioid utilization rates (morphine milligram equivalents [MME]/day) and overuse rates at 6 months post-index procedure were assessed. All pvalues <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Following examination of 153,500 patient records, 1,216 patients were matched into cannabis user and non-cannabis user cohorts. Cannabis users had lower rates of opioid utilization compared to non-cannabis users as early as 2 months after fusion (47.7% vs. 41.1%, p <0.05), a relationship which persisted at 6 months (46.2% vs. 37.7%, p <0.01). Additionally, cannabis users had lower rates of high-dose opioid utilization (≥100 MME per day) during the initial 14-30 days following surgery (6.91% vs. 3.79%, p <0.05).

Conclusions: Patients with a history of cannabis use were less likely to be using opioids as early as 2 months postoperatively and had lower rates of high-dose opioid utilization in the immediate postoperative period. Physicians operating on these patients should consider their cannabis use patterns to provide appropriate titration of pain medication over time.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39434224/

https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2024.0194

Changes in Pain and Mental Health Symptoms Associated with Prescribed Medicinal Cannabis Use: A One-Year Longitudinal Study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Chronic pain and mental health issues like depression and anxiety significantly contribute to disease burden in Western countries.

While cannabinoids are suggested to have analgesic, anxiolytic and antidepressant properties, evidence, especially for long-term use, is inconclusive. This 12-month observational study evaluated the effects of prescribed medicinal cannabis for 96 patients suffering from pain, as well as sleep disturbances, depression and anxiety. Treatment outcomes for pain, depression, anxiety and sleep problems were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months using validated instruments.

Significant reductions were observed in pain scores and the interference of pain on daily functions, alongside improvements in mental health and sleep. Many patients reported notable improvements in pain severity and reduced use of pain medications in the first 6 months, with a decline at 12 months. Additionally, sustained improvements in depression, anxiety, stress and sleep were observed, with about half reporting substantial improvement. Adverse effects were common but mostly mild or moderate, most commonly dry mouth and sleepiness.

These results show that prescribed medicinal cannabis treatment is associated with improvements in chronic pain and mental health symptoms, such as depression, anxiety and stress. However, findings also suggest reduced effectiveness with longer-term use, emphasizing the need for additional research.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39432717/

“Cannabis is a plant that has been used for thousands of years as a traditional medicine to treat various medical ailments, including pain.

Overall, we found that the use of medicinal cannabis was associated with reduced pain during the first 6 months and improved mental well-being over 12 months. Patients reported not only less pain but also experienced reduced interference from pain in their daily functions. Furthermore, they reported decreased use of pain medications and a large proportion felt that their pain symptoms had significantly improved, as reflected in their reported changes in the severity of pain.”

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15360288.2024.2414898

An early economic analysis of medical cannabis for the treatment of chronic pain

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) are increasingly demonstrating effectiveness in treating a wide range of conditions, with a relatively high safety profile in clinical usage compared to other prescription pain medications and few contraindications. Consultation and other prescription-related costs are, at present, higher for CBMPs than for some other treatment options, leading to some concern around wider prescribing.

Research design and methods: An early cost-effectiveness model was developed to estimate the impact of prescribing CBMPs alone and/or in addition to analgesics, physiotherapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain in the UK for 1 year.

Results: Due to their comparative effectiveness, CBMPs were found to be cost saving. Various scenarios were model tested; in all scenarios where CBMPs decrease pain-level states, less resource use is required. Increased efficacy of 5% was conservatively assumed based on current Real-World Evidence. In this scenario, CBMPs were significantly more cost-effective, and as costs relating to the prescribing of these continue to fall, relative savings are predicted to increase.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the substantial cost saving that CBMPs may represent for the treatment of chronic pain patients, and the benefits for healthcare providers as a treatment for this often hard-to-treat population.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39415537/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14737167.2024.2412248