“This work reports the development of electrospun cellulose acetate (CA) membranes derived from Cannabis sativa biomass for potential use in therapeutic dressings.
Cellulose was extracted from cannabis stalks using alkaline pulping and bleaching, followed by homogeneous acetylation to obtain CA with controlled substitution. CA solutions (13%-25%) were electrospun under varying parameters, and the 17% formulation yielded the most homogeneous, bead-free nanofibers. The resulting membranes were characterized using FTIR, XRD, Raman spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectrophotometry, and SEM. FTIR and Raman confirmed acetylation through characteristic ester and methyl group vibrations.
XRD revealed reduced crystallinity in CA compared to native cellulose. SEM analysis showed uniform fiber networks with diameters between 500 and 800 nm. A bilayer dressing prototype was fabricated by integrating the electrospun membrane with a medical-grade silicone adhesive. Adhesion performance was evaluated on synthetic skin using a FINAT-standardized 180° peel test.
The membranes demonstrated adequate mechanical cohesion and conformability, supporting their application as sustainable, plant-based biomedical patches.”
“Taken together, this work presents the first full validation of cannabis-derived cellulose acetate as a processable, biocompatible, and functionally versatile material for advanced medical dressing systems.
Collectively, these findings support the use of Cannabis sativa as a viable and sustainable raw material for the development of high-performance cellulose acetate membranes. The study demonstrates not only the chemical and morphological comparability of cannabis-derived materials to commercial analogs but also their potential in next-generation biomedical and filtration technologies.”
“Introduction: Chronic pain affects approximately 20% of U.S. adults, imposing significant burdens on individuals and healthcare systems. Medical cannabis has emerged as a potential therapy, yet its impact on healthcare utilization remains unclear.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed administrative data from a telehealth platform providing medical cannabis certifications across 36 U.S. states. Patients were classified as cannabis-exposed if they had used cannabis in the past year, while unexposed patients had no prior cannabis use. Outcomes included self-reported urgent care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and quality of life (QoL), measured using the CDC’s Healthy Days measure. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation with SuperLearner estimated causal effects, adjusting for numerous covariates.
Results: Medical cannabis users exhibited significantly lower healthcare utilization. Specifically, exposure was associated with a 2.0 percentage point reduction in urgent care visits (95% CI: -0.036, -0.004), a 3.2 percentage point reduction in ED visits (95% CI: -0.051, -0.012) and fewer unhealthy days per month (-3.52 days, 95% CI: -4.28, -2.76). Hospitalization rates trended lower but were not statistically significant. Covariate balance and propensity score overlap indicated well-fitting models.
Conclusions: Medical cannabis use was associated with reduced healthcare utilization and improved self-reported QoL among chronic pain patients.”
“The findings of this study suggest, in line with existing research, that medical cannabis is likely an effective treatment option for patients with chronic pain. Moreover, we found that, in addition to an increase in QoL, medical cannabis exposure is associated with lower risk of urgent care and ED visits, when comparing patients who used medical cannabis for at least one year to cannabis-naïve patients. This underscores the potential for not only QoL gains associated with medical cannabis use, but also positive downstream effects on the healthcare system resulting from treatment.”
“Background: Patients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often seek alternative therapies for symptom management. This study investigates the perceptions, consumption patterns, and reported outcomes of cannabis and cannabidiol (CBD) oil use among IBD patients and controls.
Methods: A 37-question survey was administered to 139 participants (IBD patients, n = 93; control/non-IBD participants, n = 33) to assess usage frequency and beliefs regarding cannabis and CBD oil as treatment for IBD. The survey also evaluated the impact of these substances on IBD symptoms, quality of life, and opioid use.
Results: Cannabis consumption was higher in IBD patients (57, 53.8%) than controls (15, 45.5%) with both groups strongly supporting medical cannabis use (IBD; 92, 86.8% vs. controls; 29, 84.9%). Most IBD patients believed cannabis (67, 63.2%), CBD oil (60, 56.6%), corticosteroids (77, 73.3%), and biologics/immunosuppressants (85, 81.0%) had a somewhat-extremely beneficial effect in relieving IBD symptoms. Over 50% of IBD cannabis users reported relief from abdominal pain, other pain, stress, anxiety, depression, and nausea/vomiting, with Crohn’s disease patients experiencing significantly more relief than ulcerative colitis patients for certain symptoms (p < 0.05). Notably, 19.4% of IBD patients reported decreased opioid use, and 14.5% reported induced remission with cannabis or CBD oil.
Conclusions: Consumption of cannabis and CBD oil was perceived as beneficial for relieving IBD, with many reporting significant symptom relief from using these substances. The strong support of cannabis and CBD oil as medical treatments and therapeutic effects highlights the potential for cannabis and CBD oil as treatments in IBD.”
“Recent preclinical studies have suggested that cannabinoids, including CBD and THC, may reduce gastrointestinal inflammation and modulate intestinal motility. The presence of cannabinoid receptors in the gut, along with the anti-inflammatory effects of some cannabinoids, has led researchers to explore the potential for therapeutic applications of cannabis in the treatment of IBD.”
“Animal studies of the chemistry and physiology of cannabinoids have shown potential anti-inflammatory, antidiarrheal, and nociceptive-limiting effects, paralleling the growing interest in cannabis as a treatment option for IBD.
Human studies have also indicated that there may be a benefit in controlling IBD symptoms and improving quality of life. Additionally, anecdotal reports and observational studies have highlighted potential benefits in reducing disease activity and managing symptoms like abdominal pain, cramping, joint pain, and diarrhea.”
“Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Nabiximols (Sativex®) on spasticity in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) individuals refractory to conventional therapy. Secondary objectives included assessing its impact on functional independence, neuropathic pain, sleep quality, and depression.
Setting: Institute Guttmann, a neurorehabilitation hospital in Badalona, Catalonia (Spain).
Methods: Adult participants ( >18 years) with chronic SCI ( >6 months) and moderate to severe spasticity refractory to conventional treatments were recruited. All participants underwent baseline assessments and were followed up at one and two months after initiating treatment with nabiximols oromucosal spray, with individualised dose adjustments on a weekly basis. Assessed variables included spasticity, functional independence, neuropathic pain, sleep quality, depression, quality of life, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I).
Results: Statistically significant improvements in spasticity were observed after one month (VAS decrease of 30%, p < 0.001; MAS decrease of 60%, p = 0.001) and two months (VAS decrease of 30%, p < 0.001; MAS decrease of 52%, p = 0.011) of treatment. A positive PGI-I was reported in 67% of participants. However, no significant changes were noted in spasms frequency, functional independence, neuropathic pain, or sleep quality. No significant differences in spasticity change or non-motor symptoms were found between participants with complete and incomplete SCI.
Conclusions: Nabiximols may effectively reduce spasticity in individuals with SCI resistant to conventional therapies. Given the significant impact of spasticity associated with SCI, it could be considered a viable add-on therapy for this population.”
“Interaction with cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) partially determines the bioactivity of the phytocannabinoids. Consequently, there has also been significant effort directed toward preparing synthetic cannabinoids with either enhanced agonistic or antagonistic activity against this receptor. The design process of these molecules, and the identification of off-target effects at this receptor for molecules designed to target other proteins, would be aided by a reliable computational tool that can accurately predict binding. Furthermore, although the mechanism of CB1 agonism is understood, the conformational behavior that underlies the molecular mechanism of partial agonism is unclear. In this report, we provide a correction for calculating a ligand’s affinity to the orthosteric site of CB1 to account for their partition into membranes, use this to register the predicted affinity (high and low) of cannabinoids, and discuss how a mechanism for THC partial agonism arises natively from the model consistent with experimental data.”
“We developed a model for predicting binding affinity and activity of cannabinoids which can be used for further drug design efforts in the design of new cannabinoid-based ligands.”
“Background: Whether cannabis is a risk factor for cardiovascular events is unknown. We examined the association between smoking cannabis and cardiovascular events in a cohort of older veterans (66 to 68 years of age) with coronary artery disease.
Methods: The THC Cohort (Heart and Cannabis) comprised 4285 veterans (mean [SD] age, 67.5 [1.01] years; 2% female) with coronary artery disease who were born in 1950 to 1952. Participants were recruited between April 5, 2018, and March 12, 2020, interviewed about health behaviors, and then classified according to their self-reported cannabis smoking status in the previous 30 days. In a separate analysis, we classified participants according to any form of cannabis use (smoking, vaping, or edible use) versus nonuse in the past 30 days. Data on demographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics were collected by telephone interview and from national Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare data sources. The primary outcome included a composite of fatal and nonfatal stroke, fatal and nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. The follow-up period for each patient extended from the date of their initial interview until the end of study (June 14, 2022). All participants were followed until they experienced an outcome or until the end of the follow-up period. Survey nonresponse weights and propensity score-based weights were used to reduce bias and confounding. Hazard ratios were estimated using cause-specific hazard models.
Results: The cohort included 1015 veterans with coronary artery disease who reported smoking cannabis in the previous 30 days and 3122 veterans who did not smoke cannabis in the previous 30 days. Mean follow-up was 3.3 years, and 563 events occurred. Compared with veterans who did not smoke cannabis, smoking cannabis (past 30 days) was not associated with the composite outcome of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.61-1.24]). Similarly, use of any form of cannabis (smoking, vaping, dabbing, edibles) in the past 30 days was not associated with the composite outcome.
Conclusions: In this cohort of older veterans with coronary artery disease, self-reported cannabis use was not independently associated with increased cardiovascular events over a mean of 3.3 years of follow-up.”
“In this older cohort of veterans with coronary artery disease, both recent and lifetime smoking of cannabis were not associated with risk for having a CVD event, defined as heart attack, stroke, or cardiovascular death.”
“Beyond established CVD risk factors, we could not detect an association of cannabis use with CVD events, so it may not be an important contributor in this population.”
“Background: The efficacy of medical cannabis in alleviating pain has been demonstrated in clinical trials, yet questions remain regarding the extent to which specific chemical compounds contribute to analgesia versus expectation-based (placebo) responses. Effective blinding is notoriously difficult in cannabis trials, complicating the identification of compound-specific effects.
Methods: In a prospective study of 329 chronic pain patients (40% females; aged 48.9 ± 15.5) prescribed medical cannabis, we examined whether the chemical composition of cannabis cultivars could predict treatment outcomes. We used a Random Forest classifier with nested cross-validation to assess the predictive value of demographics, clinical features, and approximately 200 chemical compounds. Model robustness was evaluated using six additional machine learning algorithms.
Results: Here we show that incorporating chemical composition markedly improves the prediction of pain relief (AUC = 0.63 ± 0.10) compared to models using only demographic and clinical features (AUC = 0.52 ± 0.09; p < 0.001). This result is consistent across all models tested. While well-known cannabinoids such as THC and CBD provide limited predictive value, specific terpenoids, particularly α-Bisabolol and eucalyptol, emerge as key predictors of treatment response.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that pain relief can be predicted from cannabis chemical profiles that are unknown to patients, providing evidence for compound-specific therapeutic effects. These results highlight the importance of considering the full range of cannabis compounds when developing more precise and effective cannabis-based therapies for pain management.”
“Chronic pain affects millions of people, and many turn to medical cannabis for relief. However, scientists debate whether cannabis truly reduces pain or if patients feel better simply because they expect it to work (placebo effect). In this study, we looked at 329 people who used medical cannabis and analyzed the chemical makeup of their treatments. Using machine learning, we tested whether the specific chemicals in cannabis could predict who would get pain relief.
We found that patients’ pain improvement could be predicted from the chemical content of their cannabis, even though patients didn’t know what chemicals they were receiving. This suggests that cannabis provides real pain relief beyond just patient expectations.
These findings show that medical cannabis has genuine therapeutic effects for pain management.”
“In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, our study provides compelling evidence that the efficacy of MC in pain relief is not merely a placebo response but is strongly influenced by its diverse chemical composition. Our findings challenge the traditional focus on THC and CBD as the primary therapeutic agents in cannabis and highlight the importance of considering the full spectrum of chemical compounds present in MC. By embracing a more comprehensive approach to understanding MC’s therapeutic potential, we can work towards developing safer, more effective, and more precisely targeted treatments for the millions of individuals suffering from chronic pain worldwide.”
“Purpose: Cystic echinococcosis is a parasitic zoonosis caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Albendazole (ABZ) is the drug of choice, although its efficacy is variable. The present research aimed to assess the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of a full-spectrum extract of Cannabis sativa inflorescences against E. granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.).
Methods: Protoscoleces and cysts were incubated in vitro with the C. sativa extract, achieving final CBD concentrations of 1, 5, 10, and 50 µg/ml. Viability was evaluated periodically. Structural and ultrastructural alterations were also recorded. For the clinical efficacy study, female CF-1 mice were infected. Six months later, mice were divided into groups (n = 10): (a) water control; (b) ABZ; (c) C. sativa extract, and (d) ABZ + C. sativa extract. Treatments were administered every 24 h for 30 days. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated according to the weight of the cysts collected and the ultrastructural alterations observed.
Results: The C. sativa extract caused a significant decrease in the viability of protoscoleces and cysts in vitro. The greatest effect was observed with 50 µg/ml, which generated the reduction in protoscoleces viability to 0% between 6 and 24 h post-incubation (pi) and the collapse of 92 ± 13% of the cysts after 24 h pi. All the in vivo treatments reduced the weight of the cysts and caused ultrastructural alterations, especially the combination of ABZ + C. sativa extract.
Conclusion: We demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of a full-spectrum extract of C. sativa inflorescences against E. granulosus s.s.”
“Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto (s.s.) refers to a specific species within the Echinococcus granulosus complex, a group of tapeworms that cause cystic echinococcosis (CE) in humans and other animals. This species, also known as the “sheep strain,” is the most prevalent cause of human CE globally.”
“Cystic echinococcosis in cattle and sheep caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto genotypes G1 and G3 in the USA”
“Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common liver disorder caused by oxidative stress and dysregulation of lipid metabolism. The endocannabinoid system (ECS), particularly the type 1 cannabinoid (CB1) receptor, plays a crucial role in NAFLD progression. Cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), along with terpenes, such as beta-myrcene and d-limonene, have shown potential therapeutic effects on liver health, particularly in reducing oxidative stress and modulating lipid metabolism.
This study aimed to analyse the effects of five cannabis oils (COs), each with different CBD:THC ratios and terpenes content, on hypertension, dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, oxidative stress, and CB1 receptor expression in an experimental model of NAFLD induced by a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) in Wistar rats for 3 weeks.
Methods: Male Wistar rats were fed either a: (1) reference diet (RD; standard commercial laboratory diet) or a: (2) sucrose-rich diet (SRD) for 3 weeks. 3 to 7 SRD + CO as following: (3) SRD + THC; (4) SRD + CBD; (5) SRD + CBD:THC 1:1; (6) SRD + CBD:THC 2:1; and (7) SRD + CBD:THC 3:1. The COs were administered orally at a dose of 1.5 mg total cannabinoids/kg body weight daily. The cannabinoid and terpenes content of all COs used in the study was determined. The terpenes found in COs were beta-myrcene, d-limonene, terpinolene, linalool, beta-caryophyllene, alpha-humulene, (-)-guaiol, (-)-alpha-bisabolol. During the experimental period, body weight, food intake and blood pressure were measured. Serum glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, uric acid, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (AP) levels were evaluated. Liver tissue histology, NAFLD activity score (NAS), triglyceride and cholesterol content, lipogenic enzyme activities, enzyme related to mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, reactive oxygen species (ROS), thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS), and antioxidant enzyme activities were also evaluated. The CB1 receptor expression was also determined.
Results: The results showed that SRD-fed rats developed hypertension, dyslipidemia, liver damage, hepatic steatosis, lipid peroxidation, and oxidative stress. This was accompanied by upregulation of liver CB1 receptor expression. CBD-rich CO, CBD:THC 1:1 ratio CO; CBD:THC 2:1 ratio CO and CBD:THC 3:1 ratio CO showed antihypertensive properties. THC-rich CO, CBD:THC 1:1 ratio CO; CBD:THC 2:1 ratio CO showed the greatest beneficial effects against hepatic steatosis and liver damage. All COs exhibited antioxidant effects in liver tissue. This was associated with normal liver CB1 receptor expression.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that COs, particularly THC-rich CO, CBD:THC ratio 1:1 CO, CBD:THC ratio 2:1 CO and terpenes, can effectively reduce dyslipidemia, liver damage and hepatic steatosis in SRD-induced NAFLD. COs with a higher proportion of CBD in their composition showed antihypertensive properties. All the COs exhibited antioxidant properties. These findings suggest that COs, especially those with CBD:THC ratios of 1:1 and 2:1 and terpenes, may represent a promising therapeutic approach for managing NAFLD and preventing its progression to more severe liver disease.”
“This study demonstrated that COs, particularly THC-rich formulations, and those with CBD:THC ratios of 1:1 and 2:1, effectively reduced dyslipidemia, hepatic steatosis, and liver damage in SRD-induced NAFLD. All COs exhibited significant antioxidant properties, which contributed to the attenuation of oxidative stress. Notably, oils containing CBD also displayed antihypertensive effects, likely due to their vasodilatory properties. The modulation of CB1 receptor is closely linked to the improvement in hepatic steatosis and oxidative stress. These results underscore the synergistic role of cannabinoids and terpenes in targeting key mechanisms involved in NAFLD pathophysiology.”
“These findings suggest that COs, especially those with balanced CBD: THC ratios (1:1 and 2:1) and with meaningful terpenes content, represent a promising therapeutic approach for managing NAFLD and preventing its progression to more severe liver diseases.”
“The endocannabinoid system (eCBS) plays a crucial role in pain modulation through its components, including endocannabinoids, cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), and metabolic enzymes.
Recent research highlights the interaction between the eCBS and non-opioid analgesics, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and pyrazolones. These agents may enhance endogenous endocannabinoid levels or influence eCBS signaling pathways, providing a multifaceted approach to pain relief.
This review examines the pharmacological mechanisms underlying these interactions, focusing on the potential of non-opioid eCBS interactions, detailing synergistic effects that could improve analgesic efficacy while minimizing side effects. Additionally, we explore the therapeutic implications of co-administering non-opioid analgesics with eCBS modulators to create more effective pain management strategies.
The combined modulation of non-opioid pathways and the eCBS represents a promising treatment for acute and chronic pain, warranting further clinical investigation and translational research in this evolving field.”
“Emerging Therapeutic Strategies: The integration of non-opioid medications with eCBS modulators represents a novel approach in pain management strategies, aiming to minimize opioid use while maximizing therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles during chronic pain management.”
