“Evidence has accumulated that Cannabis-derived compounds have the potential to treat neuroinflammatory changes present in neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism spectrum disorder. However, research is needed on the specific brain health benefits of strains of whole Cannabis extract that are ready for commercial production.
Here, we explore the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects of NTI-164, a genetically unique high-cannabidiol (CBD), low-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol extract, and also CBD alone on BV-2 microglia and SHSY-5Y neurons. Inflammation-induced up-regulation of microglial inflammatory markers was significantly attenuated by NTI-164, but not by CBD. NTI-164 promoted undifferentiated neuron proliferation and differentiated neuron survival under excitotoxic conditions.
These effects suggest the potential for NTI-164 as a treatment for neuropathologies.”
“Background: Two major bacterial pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes, are becoming increasingly antibiotic-resistant. Despite the urgency, only a few new antibiotics have been approved to address these infections. Although cannabinoids have been noted for their antibacterial properties, a comprehensive review of their effects on these bacteria has been lacking.
Objective: This systematic review examines the antibacterial activity of cannabinoids against S. aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) strains, and S. pyogenes.
Methods: Databases, including CINAHL, Cochrane, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS, were searched. Of 3510 records, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration of cannabinoids.
Results: Cannabidiol (CBD) emerged as the most effective cannabinoid, with MICs ranging from 0.65 to 32 mg/L against S. aureus, 0.5 to 4 mg/L for MRSA, and 1 to 2 mg/L for VRSA. Other cannabinoids, such as cannabichromene, cannabigerol (CBG), and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), also exhibited significant antistaphylococcal activity. CBD, CBG, and Δ9-THC also showed efficacy against S. pyogenes, with MICs between 0.6 and 50 mg/L. Synergistic effects were observed when CBD and essential oils from Cannabis sativa when combined with other antibacterial agents.
Conclusion: Cannabinoids’ antibacterial potency is closely linked to their structure-activity relationships, with features like the monoterpene region, aromatic alkyl side chain, and aromatic carboxylic groups enhancing efficacy, particularly in CBD and its cyclic forms. These results highlight the potential of cannabinoids in developing therapies for resistant strains, though further research is needed to confirm their clinical effectiveness.”
“In conclusion, cannabinoids such as CBD, CBG, and Δ9-THC offer significant promise as alternatives or adjuncts to traditional antibiotics, particularly for targeting S. aureus, MRSA, and S. pyogenes. Their favourable safety profile positions them as potential candidates for antibacterial therapies, though rigorous clinical trials, standardised testing, and long-term safety studies are crucial to fully unlock their potential in combating AMR.”
“Introduction: The effect of prenatal cannabis exposure (PCE) on childhood neurodevelopment remains poorly understood. There is a paucity of studies describing the neurodevelopment impact of PCE in infancy. The Mullen Scale of Early Learning (MSEL) is a cognitive screening tool that can be used from birth to 68 months and includes language and motor domains. Here we aim to explore the association between PCE during pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 months of age.
Methods: Participants were pregnant persons/infant pairs enrolled in The Safe Passage Study, a large prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria included data available on PCE with associated MSEL scores at 12 months of age. Exposed participants were defined as early exposure (1st trimester only) or late exposure (2nd or 3rd trimester) and were randomly matched with unexposed participants. Multiple linear regression models were performed to test associations between prenatal cannabis exposure and the five Mullen subscales: gross motor, fine motor, expressive language, receptive language, and visual reception.
Results: Sixty-nine exposed and 138 randomly matched unexposed infants were included in the analyses. Mothers of children with PCE were younger with the mean age 23.7 years for early exposure (n = 51) and 22.8 years for late exposure (n = 18). Maternal characteristics with prenatal cannabis use include a high-school education, American Indian or Alaska Native descent, lower socioeconomic status and co-use of tobacco. There were no gestational age or sex difference among the groups. Expressive (95% CI: 2.54-12.76; p = 0.0036,) and receptive language scores (95% CI: 0.39-8.72; p = 0.0322) were significantly increased between late-exposed infants compared to unexposed infants following adjustment for covariates. Gross motor scores (95% CI: 1.75-13; p = 0.0105) were also significantly increased for early-exposed infants with no difference in visual reception scores.
Conclusion: Preclinical studies have shown abnormal brain connectivity in offspring exposed to cannabis affecting emotional regulation, hyperactivity, and language development. Results from this study link PCE to altered early language development within the first year of life. Exposed infants demonstrated increased expressive and receptive language scores at 12 months of age, which can translate to better performance in school. However, further research is needed to determine the implications of these results later in childhood.”
“Introduction: Cannabis is by far the most widely used and abused drug listed on the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Schedule I, which includes drugs with a high potential for abuse. There is evidence of short-term negative effects of cannabis use on cognition, but only a limited number of studies have explored the association between cannabis use and age-related cognitive decline. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between cannabis use and age-related cognitive decline from early adulthood to late midlife.
Methods: The study population consisted of 5162 men who had participated in Danish follow-up studies on cognitive aging. These studies included scores on the military intelligence test Børge Prien’s Prøve from both the conscription assessment (mean age = 20 years; p1 and p99: 18 and 26 years) and from the follow-up (mean age = 64 years; p1 and p99: 55 and 72 years) as well as extensive data on lifestyle and health from the follow-up questionnaires. The association between cannabis use and age-related cognitive decline was investigated in linear regression models.
Results: Men with a history of cannabis use had less cognitive decline from early adulthood to late midlife compared to men without a history of cannabis use. Among cannabis users, neither age of initiation of cannabis use nor frequent use was significantly associated with a greater age-related cognitive decline.
Discussion and conclusions: In a sample of more than 5000 men followed for a mean of 44 years, we found no significant harmful effects of cannabis use on age-related cognitive decline.”
“In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between cannabis use and age-related cognitive decline from early adulthood to late midlife. This study contributes to the sparse knowledge on this subject and aligns with most existing studies, suggesting no association between cannabis use and greater cognitive decline. More specifically, in the present study, cannabis users experienced slightly less cognitive decline compared to nonusers, and the association remained significant when controlling for potential confounders. Among cannabis users, no significant association was found with cognitive decline for either age of initiation of cannabis use or frequent cannabis use. Further studies are needed to investigate whether these findings reflect that there are no adverse effects on cognitive decline or that the effects of cannabis are temporary and disappear after a prolonged period of time.”
“Several pieces of evidence have implicated the endocannabinoid system on dopaminergic mesolimbic brain reward, as well as the potential role of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 on modulation of reinforced properties of drug abuse and consequently to the treatment of substance use disorder, including alcoholism.
Moreover, growing evidence has been proposed that cannabis or cannabinoid compounds may be helpful to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD).
Cannabis is prevalent among individuals who also consume alcohol. While some authors reported that cannabis may be a promising candidate as a substitute medication for AUD, some studies have demonstrated that concomitant use of alcohol and cannabis may increase the risk of adverse outcomes.
Considering that advances in the legalization and decriminalization movements regarding cannabis have led to increased availability worldwide, the current chapter aims to provide evidence on the benefits and risks of combining alcohol and cannabis, as well as the potential therapeutic use of cannabinoid compounds in treating AUD.”
“Growing studies have indicated that medicinal cannabis could be reasoned as a substitute therapy for alcohol, especially among individuals who are trying to reduce drinking behavior. Based on these premises, medicinal cannabis might be safer and also produce less social harms, for this reason some studies have been pointed as a good candidate for substitute medication for alcohol.”
“Background: Observational evidence investigating associations between cannabis use and blood pressure and hypertension is inconsistent.
Methods: Cross-sectional data from 3,255 participants at Exam 6 (2016-2018) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) were analyzed, including self-reported cannabis smoking patterns, standardized measures of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP; BP collectively), and hypertension. ANCOVA and multivariable relative risk regression models were used to calculate adjusted means for BP and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for prevalent hypertension.
Results: In fully adjusted ANCOVA models, a history of regular cannabis smoking, when compared to no history, was not significantly associated with increased SBP [mean difference: 0.1 mmHg (95% CI: -1.6-1.9)], DBP [mean difference: 0.5 mmHg (95% CI: -0.3-1.4)], PP [mean difference: -0.5 mmHg (95% CI: -1.8-0.9)], or prevalent hypertension [PR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.93-1.10)]. Furthermore, no associations were observed for either the duration or recency (in the past month) of cannabis smoking or number of joint/pipe years. Models exploring potential interactions between a history of regular cannabis smoking and age, sex, race/ethnicity, and cigarette smoking status were not significant for either BP or hypertension.
Conclusions: In a cohort of racially and ethnically diverse older adults with a high prevalence of hypertension, no evidence of increased risk due to regular cannabis smoking was found for either blood pressure or hypertension.”
“In a cohort of racially and ethnically diverse older adults with a high prevalence of hypertension, no evidence of increased risk due to regular cannabis smoking was found for either blood pressure or hypertension.”
“Defects in myelin homeostasis have been reported in many neuropathological conditions. Cannabinoid compounds have been shown to efficiently promote myelin regeneration in animal models of demyelination. However, it is still unknown whether this action relies mostly on a cell autonomous effect on oligodendroglial-lineage-NG2 cells.
By using conditional genetic mouse models, here we found that cannabinoid CB1 receptors located on NG2 cells are required for oligodendroglial differentiation and myelin regeneration after demyelination. Selective CB1 receptor gene depletion in NG2 cells following toxin-induced demyelination disrupted oligodendrocyte regeneration and functional remyelination and exacerbated axonal damage. These deficits were rescued by pharmacological blockade of the RhoA/ROCK/Cofilin pathway.
Conversely, tetrahydrocannabinol administration promoted oligodendrocyte regeneration and functional remyelination in wild-type but not Ng2-CB1-deficient mice.
Overall, this study identifies CB1 receptors as essential modulators of remyelination and support the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids for promoting remyelination in neurological disorders.”
“Cannabinoids have been shown to modulate myelin development and regeneration in mice. Here, using OPC-specific reporter mouse lines in combination with models of toxin-induced demyelination, we found that CB1 receptors located on NG2 cells, by modulating RhoA/ROCK/cofilin and mTORC1 signaling in a coordinated manner, exert an essential function in controlling NG2 cell differentiation, OL regeneration, myelin regeneration and functional recovery following demyelination, thus supporting the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids for promoting remyelination in neurological disorders.”
“Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. However, the effective treatment for breast cancer progression is still being sought.
The activation of cannabinoid receptor (CB) has been shown to negatively affect breast cancer cell survival.
Our previous study also reported that breast cancer cells responded to various combinations of CB1 and CB2 agonists differently. Nonetheless, the mechanism underlying this effect and whether this phenomenon can be seen in other cancer characteristics remain unknown. Therefore, this study aims to further elucidate the effects of highly selective CB agonists and their combination on triple-negative breast cancer proliferation, cell cycle progression, invasion, lamellipodia formation as well as proteomic profile of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.
The presence of CB agonists, specifically a 2:1 (ACEA: GW405833) combination, prominently inhibited colony formation and induced the S-phase cell cycle arrest in MDA-MB-231 cells. Furthermore, cell invasion ability and lamellipodia formation of MDA-MB-231 were also attenuated by the exposure of CB agonists and their 2:1 combination ratio. Our proteomic analysis revealed proteomic profile alteration in MDA-MB-231 upon CB exposure that potentially led to breast cancer suppression, such as ZPR1/SHC1/MAPK-mediated cell proliferation and AXL/VAV2/RAC1-mediated cell motility pathways.
Our findings showed that selective CB agonists and their combination suppressed breast cancer characteristics in MDA-MB-231 cells. The exposure of CB agonists also altered the proteomic profile of MDA-MB-231, which could lead to cell proliferation and motility suppression.”
“Our study demonstrated that the presence of CB agonists hindered breast cancer cell growth, cell cycle progression, invasion through extracellular matrices and lamellipodia formation. The exposure of specific combination of CB1 and CB2 agonists also enhanced their breast cancer suppression effects. Moreover, breast cancer survival and motility-related proteins affected by the presence of these agonists suggesting the potential pathways underlying their effects were also depicted in this study.”
“Background: There is a need to explore pharmacological options for syndrome (FMS), such as medical cannabis. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and analyze the available information about the effectiveness/efficacy and safety of cannabis-based products for medical use (CBPMs) and cannabis-based medicines (CBMs), in patients with FMS.
Methods: Interventional or observational studies, systematic reviews and meta-analysis regarding the effectiveness/efficacy and safety of CBPMs and CBMs in patients with FMS were retrieved from the PubMed/Medline database until April 2024. Then, the information was summarized in tables, with the type of CBPM and CBM, the method used in the study and the effective-ness/efficacy and safety outcomes.
Results: 19 publications were selected from the search or form the relevant references. Different CBPM and CBM were used across the studies. Also, different instruments for measuring the effectiveness were used. In general, the use of CBPMs and CBM showed an important improvement in pain, quality of life, and sleep habits. There were no serious adverse events.
Conclusions: The results show that CBMPs and CBMs could be effective and safe in patients with FMS; however, the evidence is limited and there is a need for high-quality clinical studies conducted with improved methodological design.”
“Introduction: Approximately 4% of the UK population experiences PTSD. Individuals must exhibit symptoms across four clusters to receive a diagnosis: intrusion, avoidance, altered reactivity, and altered mood. Evidence suggests that cannabinoid agonists such as nabilone and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) may alleviate PTSD symptoms. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of THC-predominant cannabis flowers for inhalation to manage PTSD symptoms in a real-world setting.
Methods: We analysed data from the UK patient registry, T21. Validated questionnaires were used to collect PROMs for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mood/anxiety, sleep, and PTSD-specific symptoms. Inclusion criteria were (i) a confirmed diagnosis of PTSD, (ii) completed PROMs questionnaires at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up, and (iii) received a prescription for a chemotype 1 (THC-predominant) cannabis flower.
Results: Fifty-eight patients were included, 34 of which also had PROMs recorded at 6 months. Most were males (65.5%) with an average age of 39.2 years who had previously used cannabis illicitly (95.6%). At 3 months, participants reported significant improvements in overall health, mood, and sleep quality (p < 0.001) but not in the proxy for HRQoL (p = 0.052). Similarly, participants reported substantial benefits in managing intrusion symptoms (p < 0.001), mood alterations (p < 0.001), and reactivity alterations (p = 0.002), which were sustained or further improved at 6 months. Participants did not report any side effects associated with CBMPs.
Conclusions: Inhalation of THC is well tolerated and useful for managing symptoms of PTSD in cannabis-experienced individuals. However, further research is needed to evaluate the long-term safety and outcomes of controlled inhalation of CBMP in patients naïve to cannabis.”
“Results from this observational study suggest an association between treatment with THC-predominant cannabis flowers and symptomatic improvement for up to 6 months in a cohort of UK civilians diagnosed with PTSD. The treatment was safe and well tolerated and characterized by marked effects on quality of sleep, general mood, and severity of PTSD-associated symptoms. Despite previous exposure to cannabis, participants continued to report benefits after initiating treatment with THC-predominant cannabis flowers.”
