Category Archives: THC (Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol)

Cannabinoids shift the basal ganglia miRNA m6A methylation profile towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype in SIV-infected Rhesus macaques

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Epitranscriptomic modifications modulate diverse biological processes, such as regulation of gene expression, abundance, location and function. In particular, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation has been shown to regulate various disease processes, including cancer and inflammation. While there is evidence that m6A modification is functionally relevant in neural development and differentiation, the role of m6A modification in HIV neuropathogenesis is unknown.

Here, we identified direct m6A modifications in miRNAs from BG tissues of Rhesus Monkeys (RMs) that were either vehicle-treated uninfected (VEH), SIV-infected combination anti-retroviral therapy (cART) treated (VEH/SIV/cART), or THC:CBD treated VEH/SIV/cART (THC:CBD/SIV/cART) RMs.

We detected m6A modifications across all BG tissues. SIV infection promoted an overall hypomethylated m6A profile. While the overall hypomethylated m6A profile was not significantly impacted by THC:CBD treatment, specific miRNAs, particularly those predicted to target proinflammatory genes showed markedly reduced m6A methylation levels compared to the VEH treated RMs. Additionally, we found that specific BG tissue miRNAs bearing m6A epi-transcriptomic marks were also transferred to BG-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). Mechanistically, we identified the DRACH motif of the seed region of miR-194-5p to be significantly m6A hypomethylated, which was predicted to directly target STAT1, an important interferon-activated transcription factor known to drive neuroinflammation, in diseases ranging from Alzheimer to Parkinson and Huntington disease.

Notably, THC:CBD treatments significantly reduced m6A methylation of 43 miRNA species directly involved in regulating CNS network genes, thus providing a possible mechanist explanation on the beneficial effects of THC:CBD treatments noted in several disease involving neuroinflammation.

Our findings also underscore the need for investigating the qualitative, posttranscriptional modification changes in the RNA profiles along with the more traditional, qualitative alterations in pathological conditions or after various treatment regimens.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39416016/

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.11.614514v1

Decoding the Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Neurological Disorders

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“For millennia, Cannabis sativa has served diverse roles, from medicinal applications to recreational use. Despite its extensive historical use, only a fraction of its components have been explored until recent times.

The therapeutic potential of Cannabis and its constituents has garnered attention, with suggestions for treating various conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease, and other Neurological disorders.

Recent research, particularly on animal experimental models, has unveiled the neuroprotective properties of cannabis. This neuroprotective effect is orchestrated through numerous G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and the two cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2.

While the capacity of cannabinoids to safeguard neurons is evident, a significant challenge lies in determining the optimal cannabinoid receptor agonist and its application in clinical trials. The intricate interplay of cannabinoids with the endocannabinoid system, involving CB1 and CB2 receptors, underscores the need for precise understanding and targeted approaches. Unravelling the molecular intricacies of this interaction is vital to harness the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids effectively.

As the exploration of cannabis components accelerates, there is a growing awareness of the need for nuanced strategies in utilizing cannabinoid receptor agonists in clinical settings. The evolving landscape of cannabis research presents exciting possibilities for developing targeted interventions that capitalize on the neuroprotective benefits of cannabinoids while navigating the complexities of receptor specificity and clinical applicability.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39410886/

https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/143747

Cannabinoids and Genetic Epilepsy Models: A Review with Focus on CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Pediatric genetic epilepsies, such as CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder (CDD), are severely debilitating, with early-onset seizures occurring more than ten times daily in extreme cases. Existing antiseizure drugs frequently prove ineffective, which significantly impacts child development and diminishes the quality of life for patients and caregivers.

The relaxation of cannabis legislation has increased research into potential therapeutic properties of phytocannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

CBD’s antiseizure properties have shown promise, particularly in treating drug-resistant genetic epilepsies associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), Dravet syndrome (DS), and Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC). However, specific research on CDD remains limited. Much of the current evidence relies on anecdotal reports of artisanal products lacking accurate data on cannabinoid composition. Utilizing model systems like patient-derived iPSC neurons and brain organoids allows precise dosing and comprehensive exploration of cannabinoids’ pharmacodynamics.

This review explores the potential of CBD, THC, and other trace cannabinoids in treating CDD and focusing on clinical trials and preclinical models to elucidate the cannabinoid’s potential mechanisms of action in disrupted CDD pathways and strengthen the case for further research into their potential as anti-epileptic drugs for CDD. This review offers an updated perspective on cannabinoid’s therapeutic potential for CDD.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39409097/

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/19/10768

Prenatal Cannabis Use and Offspring Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Disruptive Behavior Disorders: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Objective: To examine whether maternal cannabis use during early pregnancy is associated with offspring attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and disruptive behavior disorders (DBD).

Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective birth cohort study of children (N = 141,570) born between 2011 and 2018 to pregnant individuals (N = 117,130) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California universally screened for any prenatal cannabis use at the entrance to prenatal care (at ∼8-10 wk gestation). Prenatal cannabis use was defined as (1) self-reported use and/or a positive toxicology test, (2) self-reported use, (3) a positive toxicology test, and (4) self-reported use frequency. Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for maternal characteristics (sociodemographics, other substance use and substance use disorders, prenatal care initiation, comorbidities) examined associations between prenatal cannabis use and offspring ADHD and DBD diagnosed by age 11 years.

Results: The sample of pregnant individuals was 27.2% Asian/Pacific Islander, 5.7% Black, 24.5% Hispanic, and 38.8% non-Hispanic White, with a mean (SD) age of 30.9 (5.2) years; 4.6% screened positive for any cannabis use (0.4% daily, 0.5% weekly, 1.1% monthly or less, 2.7% unknown frequency); 3.92% had a positive toxicology test and 1.8% self-reported use; 7.7% of offspring had ADHD and 6.8% had DBD. Maternal prenatal cannabis use was not associated with ADHD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.84, 95% CI, 0.70-1.01), and there was an inverse association with DBD (aHR: 0.83, 95% CI, 0.71-0.97), which remained when cannabis was defined by toxicology testing but not by self-report. Frequency of use was not associated with outcomes.

Conclusion: Maternal prenatal cannabis use was not associated with an increased risk of offspring ADHD or DBD.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39400201/

https://journals.lww.com/jrnldbp/abstract/9900/prenatal_cannabis_use_and_offspring_attention.212.aspx

Edible cannabis for chronic low back pain: associations with pain, mood, and intoxication

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Introduction: Cannabis, commonly known for both therapeutic and intoxicating effects, is gaining accessibility on legal markets and traction as a potential alternative therapy for pain mediation, particularly in those suffering from chronic low back pain. However, the effectiveness in this population of legal market forms of cannabis, particularly commonly used edibles, is unknown.

Methods: Therefore, this study utilized a naturalistic prospective design where participants with chronic low back pain with intentions to initiate cannabis use for treatment were recruited and self-selected edible cannabis products containing varying amounts of delta- 9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Products were categorized as CBD-dominant, THC-dominant, or combined THC and CBD (THC + CBD).

Results: 249 participants [140 female (56.62%), mean (SD) age of 46.30 (16.02), 90% White] were tracked over 2 weeks of ad libitum use and assessed during a naturalistic acute cannabis administration session on changes in pain, mood, and subjective drug effects. During acute administration, a significant correlation between THC dose and short-term pain relief was found, suggesting that higher THC doses were associated with greater pain reduction (p < .05). In addition, THC was associated with higher levels of subjective cannabis drug effects (p < .001), regardless of whether CBD was also in the edible product. Acute CBD dose was primarily associated with short-term tension relief (p < .05); however, there were no associations between CBD dose and acute pain. Over the 2-week ad libitum administration period results suggested pain reductions across participants using all forms of cannabis. However, trends suggested that more frequent use of CBD-dominant edible cannabis may be associated with greater reductions in perceived pain over the 2-week observation period (p = .07).

Discussion: These findings support the short-term analgesic effects of THC and anxiolytic effects of CBD and further suggest that orally-administered THC and CBD should continue to be evaluated for the potential to provide both acute and extended relief from chronic low back pain.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39380911/

“In this naturalistic observational study, it was found that the use of edible cannabinoid products significantly reduced chronic pain in extended and acute use models. More specifically, THC dose was associated with the greatest decrease in pain during the acute use session. Further, there was signal that more frequent use of a CBD-dominant product may provide stronger relief over a 2-week ad libitum use period.

These results indicate that edible cannabis may be a safe and suitable alternative pain therapy for those looking to substitute more traditional pain medications.”

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1464005/full

Preparation of a nanoemulsion containing active ingredients of cannabis extract and its application for glioblastoma: in vitro and in vivo studies

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Recently, the anti-tumor effects of cannabis extract on various cancers have attracted the attention of researchers.

Here, we report a nanoemulsion (NE) composition designed to enhance the delivery of two active components in cannabis extracts (∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD)) in an animal model of glioblastoma. The efficacy of the NE containing the two drugs (NED) was compared with the bulk drugs and carrier (NE without the drugs) using the C6 tumor model in rats. Hemocompatibility factors (RBC, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, PPP, PT and PTT) were studied to determine the potential in vivo toxicity of NED. The optimized NED with mean ± SD diameter 29 ± 6 nm was obtained.

It was shown that by administering the drugs in the form of NED, the hemocompatibility increased. Cytotoxicity studies indicated that the NE without the active components (i.e. mixture of surfactants and oil) was the most cytotoxic group, while the bulk group had no toxicity. From the in vivo MRI and survival studies, the NED group had maximum efficacy (with ~4 times smaller tumor volume on day 7 of treatment, compared with the control. Also, survival time of the control, bulk drug, NE and NED were 9, 4, 12.5 and 51 days, respectively) with no important adverse effects.

In conclusion, the NE containing cannabis extract could be introduced as an effective treatment in reducing brain glioblastoma tumor progression.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39375818/

“Based on our findings, the nanoemulsion model containing CBD and THC increased the antitumor effect of the drugs. This may be due to the role of nanoemulsions in improving drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier and improving blood compatibility during intravenous drug administration. However, this study is a primary investigation in the rat animal model, and future studies should consider further evaluation of toxicity and efficacy in larger animal populations.”

https://bmcpharmacoltoxicol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40360-024-00788-w

Nabiximols (NBX) suppresses tremor in a rat Harmaline model of essential tremor

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most prevalent movement disorders; despite this, there remains an unmet need for novel therapies. The treatment of rats with harmaline modulates the rhythmicity of inferior olivary neurons, resulting in generalized tremor with a frequency of 9-12 Hz in rats, comparable to that of human ET (4-12 Hz).

Purpose: Interestingly, cannabinoids reduce tremor, therefore we have assessed the cannabinoid nabiximols (NBX; marketed as Sativex) a complex botanical drug mixture, in the harmaline-rat model of ET.

Method: We tested the effects of acute (single dose) and subchronic (10 days) treatment of NBX (at 5.2, 10.4 and 20.8 mg kg-1 p.o.) administered prior to harmaline and acute NBX (20.8 mg kg-1) administered post-harmaline in male SD rats. Propranolol (20 mg kg-1 i.p.) was used as a positive control. Observed Scoring (OS) was carried out prior to placement in a tremor-monitoring apparatus for the calculation of Tremor Index (TI) and Motion Power Percentage (MPP).

Results: Acute and subchronic NBX significantly attenuated harmaline-induced tremor at 10.4 and 20.8 mg kg-1, respectively, for each parameter (OS, TI, and MPP) when administered pre-harmaline as did propranolol (20 mg kg-1). NBX did not attenuate harmaline-induced tremor when administered post-harmaline.

Conclusions: These data suggest efficacy of acute and subchronic NBX to reduce tremors, based on OS, TI and MPP readouts if administered prior to harmaline. These data are the first to indicate the preclinical effects of an oral botanical cannabinoid formulation, NBX, in an animal model of ET.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39368533/

“Cannabinoids may represent potential therapies for essential tremor.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014488624003145?via%3Dihub

Identification of the TRPA1 Cannabinoid-Binding Site

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Chronic pain accounts for nearly two-thirds of conditions eligible for medical cannabis licenses, yet the mechanisms underlying cannabis-induced analgesia remain poorly understood.

The principal phytocannabinoids, the psychoactive Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and non-psychoactive cannabidiol (CBD), exhibit comparable efficacy in pain management. Notably, THC functions as an agonist of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), whereas CBD shows minimal activity on CB1 and CB2 receptors.

Elucidating the molecular targets through which phytocannabinoids modulate the pain system is required for advancing our understanding of the pain pathway and optimizing medical cannabis therapies.

Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), a pivotal chemosensor in the pain pathway, has been identified as a phytocannabinoid target. Unlike most TRPA1 activators, phytocannabinoid activation is not mediated through the electrophilic binding site, suggesting an alternative mechanism. Here, we identified the human TRPA1 channel cannabinoid-binding site (CBS) and demonstrated that mutations at residue Y840 abolished responses to both THC and CBD at saturating concentrations, indicating a shared primary binding site. Molecular modeling revealed distinct interactions of THC and CBD with the Y840 residue within the CBS. Additionally, CBD binds to the adjacent general anesthetic binding site at oversaturating concentrations.

Our findings define the CBS of TRPA1 as overlapping with and adjacent to binding sites for other allosteric activators, suggesting that TRPA1 possesses a highly adaptable domain for binding non-electrophilic activators. This underscores its unique role as a chemosensor in the pain pathway. Furthermore, our results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of cannabinoid-induced analgesia and identify novel targets for pain management therapies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39368566/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104366182400389X?via%3Dihub

Nanocarriers for Cannabinoid Delivery: Enhancing Therapeutic Potential

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Medical cannabis has potential therapeutic benefits in managing pain, anxiety, depression, and neurological and movement disorders. Phytocannabinoids derived from the cannabis plant are responsible for their pharmacological and therapeutic properties. However, the complexity of cannabis components, especially cannabinoids, poses a challenge to effective medicinal administration. Even with the increasing acceptance of cannabis-based medicines, achieving consistent bioavailability and targeted distribution remains difficult. Conventional administration methods are plagued by solubility and absorption problems requiring innovative solutions. After conducting a thorough review of research papers and patents, it has become evident that nanotechnology holds great promise as a solution. The comprehensive review of 36 research papers has yielded valuable insights, with 7 papers reporting enhanced bioavailability, while others have focused on improvements in release, solubility, and stability. Additionally, 19 patents have been analyzed, of which 7 specifically claim enhanced bioavailability, while the remaining patents describe various formulation methods. These patents outline effective techniques for encapsulating cannabis using nanocarriers, effectively addressing solubility and controlled release. Studies on the delivery of cannabis using nanocarriers focus on improving bioavailability, prolonging release, and targeting specific areas. This synthesis highlights the potential of nanotechnology to enhance cannabis therapies and pave the way for innovative interventions and precision medicine.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39356097/

https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/141807

Cannabis sativa L. Extract Alleviates Neuropathic Pain and Modulates CB1 and CB2 Receptor Expression in Rat

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Introduction: Cannabis sativa L. (CSL) extract has pain-relieving potential due to its cannabinoid content, so the effects of two CSL extracts on alleviating neuropathic pain were investigated in vivo. Methods and groups: Male Wistar rats (n = 130) were divided into groups and received vincristine (0.1 mg/kg) and gabapentin (60 mg/kg) to induce and relieve neuropathic pain or CSL extracts (D and B). The mRNA and protein expression of the cannabinoid receptors type 1 and 2 (CB1R, CB2R) were evaluated in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and lymphocytes. Behavioural tests (Tail-Flick and von Frey) were performed on all animals.

Results: VK-induced neuropathic pain was accompanied by decreased CB1R protein level and CB2R mRNA expression in the cortex. Gabapentin relieved pain and increased CB1R protein levels in the hippocampus compared to the vincristine group. Hippocampus CB1R protein expression increased with the administration of extract D (10 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg) and extract B (7.5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg) compared to VK group. In the cerebral cortex CSL decreased CB1R protein expression (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg of extract B) and mRNA level (5 mg/kg, 7.5 mg/kg of extract B; 20 mg/kg of extract D) compared to the VK-group.CB2R protein expression increased in the hippocampus after treatment with extract B (7.5 mg/kg) compared to the VK-group. In the cerebral cortex extract B (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg) increased CB2R protein expression compared to VK-group.

Conclusion: Alterations in cannabinoid receptor expression do not fully account for the observed behavioural changes in rats. Therefore, additional signalling pathways may contribute to the initiation and transmission of neuropathic pain. The Cannabis extracts tested demonstrated antinociceptive effects comparable to gabapentin, highlighting the antinociceptive properties of Cannabis extracts for human use.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39334832/

“Furthermore, both tested Cannabis sativa L. extracts demonstrated antinociceptive effects comparable to gabapentin, highlighting the potential medical value of Cannabis extracts for human use.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/14/9/1065