Incidence and Predictors of Cannabis-Related Poisoning and Mental and Behavioral Disorders among Patients with Medical Cannabis Authorization: A Cohort Study

Publication Cover

“Objective: As medical cannabis use increases in North America, establishing its safety profile is a priority. The objective of this study was to assess rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations due to poisoning by cannabis, and cannabis-related mental health disorders among medically authorized cannabis patients in Ontario, Canada, between 2014 and 2017.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who received medical cannabis authorization in Ontario, Canada, using data collected in participating cannabis clinics. Outcomes included ED visit/hospitalization with a main diagnosis code for: cannabis/cannabinoid poisoning; and mental/behavioral disorders due to cannabis use. Cox proportional hazard regressions were utilized to analyze the data.

Results: From 29,153 patients who received medical authorization, 23,091 satisfied the inclusion criteria. During a median follow-up of 240 days, 14 patients visited the ED or were hospitalized for cannabis poisoning-with an incidence rate of 8.06 per 10,000 person-years (95% CI: 4.8-13.6). A total of 26 patients visited the ED or were hospitalized for mental and behavioral disorders due to cannabis use-with an incidence rate of 15.0 per 10,000 person-years (95% CI: 10.2-22.0). Predictors of cannabis-related mental and behavioral disorders include prior substance use disorders, other mental disorders, age, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the incidence of cannabis poisoning or cannabis-related mental and behavioral disorders was low among patients who were authorized to use cannabis for medical care. Identified predictors can help to target patients with potential risk of the studied outcomes.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35866679/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10826084.2022.2102193?journalCode=isum20

Antifungal and anti-aflatoxigenic properties of organs of Cannabis sativa L.: relation to phenolic content and antioxidant capacities

SpringerLink

“Aflatoxin B1 is a carcinogenic mycotoxin that frequently contaminates crops worldwide.

Current research indicates that the use of natural extracts to combat mycotoxin contamination may represent an eco-friendly, sustainable strategy to ensure food safety. Although Cannabis sativa L. has long been known for its psychoactive cannabinoids, it is also rich in many other bioactive molecules.

This study examines extracts from various organs of Cannabis sativa L. to determine their ability to limit aflatoxin production and growth of Aspergillus flavus.

The results indicate that flower extract is most effective for limiting the synthesis of aflatoxin B1, leading to an almost-complete inhibition of toxin production at a concentration of 0.225 mg dry matter per gram of culture medium. Since flower extract is rich in phenolic compounds, its total antioxidant ability and radical-scavenging capacity are determined.

Compared with other anti-aflatoxigenic extracts, the anti-oxidative potential of Cannabis sativa L. flower extract appears moderate, suggesting that its anti-mycotoxin effect may be related to other bioactive compounds.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34143269/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-021-02444-x

Effect of CB2 Stimulation on Gene Expression in Pediatric B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: New Possible Targets

ijms-logo

“Acute lymphoblastic leukemia type B (B-ALL) is the most common kind of pediatric leukemia, characterized by the clonal proliferation of type B lymphoid stem cells. Important progress in ALL treatments led to improvements in long-term survival; nevertheless, many adverse long-term consequences still concern the medical community. Molecular and cellular target therapies, together with immunotherapy, are promising strategies to overcome these concerns.

Cannabinoids, enzymes involved in their metabolism, and cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2) constitute the endocannabinoid system, involved in inflammation, immune response, and cancer. CB2 receptor stimulation exerts anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects in many tumors.

In this study, we evaluated the effects of CB2 stimulation on B-ALL cell lines, SUP-B15, by RNA sequencing, Western blotting, and ELISA. We observe a lower expression of CB2 in SUP-B15 cells compared to lymphocytes from healthy subjects, hypothesizing its involvement in B-ALL pathogenesis. CB2 stimulation reduces the expression of CD9SEC61GTBX21, and TMSB4X genes involved in tumor growth and progression, and also negatively affects downstream intracellular pathways.

Our findings suggest an antitumor role of CB2 stimulation in B-ALL, and highlight a functional correlation between CB2 receptors and specific anti-tumoral pathways, even though further investigations are needed.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35955786/

“The antineoplastic role of cannabinoids in malignancy of the immune system, as well as in many other tumors, i.e., osteosarcoma, is well documented. Cannabinoids derive from the Cannabis plant, and interact with the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2, principally expressed in the central nervous system and in peripheral and immune cells, respectively. These receptors, together with their specific ligands (endocannabinoids) and the enzymes involved in their own synthesis and degradation, constitute the endocannabinoid system (ECS). ECS is involved in many biological functions, such as pain management, regulation of appetite, control of bone metabolism, and, noteworthily, it modulates both inflammatory processes and immune response. Several authors proposed ECS as anticancer target for different neoplasms; in particular, a proper stimulation of CB2 receptors is responsible for counteracting tumor growth and progression. We demonstrate the involvement of ECS in this neoplasm and highlight the possibility to target it to arrest growth and progression of B-ALL

Our findings describe the involvement of CB2 receptors in the pathogenesis of B-ALL, and also propose its stimulation as an innovative and effective anticancer strategy. In particular, this approach is a “molecular target therapy approach”, since the selective triggering of cannabinoid modulates both gene and protein expression. We identified a specific anti-tumoral signature playing a key role in the development and maintenance of tumors, speculating a protective effect of CB2 selective stimulation. Certainly, further investigations are needed to better understand the molecular and biochemical mechanisms underlying the observed interactions, but our study seems to already highlight a good and beneficial therapeutic perspective to ameliorate the outcome for high-risk B-ALL patients.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/15/8651/htm

The Effects of Nutrient Signaling Regulators in Combination with Phytocannabinoids on the Senescence-Associated Phenotype in Human Dermal Fibroblasts

ijms-logo

“Identifying effective anti-aging compounds is a cornerstone of modern longevity, aging, and skin-health research. There is considerable evidence of the effectiveness of nutrient signaling regulators such as metformin, resveratrol, and rapamycin in longevity and anti-aging studies; however, their potential protective role in skin aging is controversial.

In light of the increasing appearance of phytocannabinoids in beauty products without rigorous research on their rejuvenation efficacy, we decided to investigate the potential role of phytocannabinoids in combination with nutrient signaling regulators in skin rejuvenation. Utilizing CCD-1064Sk skin fibroblasts, the effect of metformin, triacetylresveratrol, and rapamycin combined with phytocannabinoids on cellular viability, functional activity, metabolic function, and nuclear architecture was tested.

We found triacetylresveratrol combined with cannabidiol increased the viability of skin fibroblasts (p < 0.0001), restored wound-healing functional activity (p < 0.001), reduced metabolic dysfunction, and ameliorated nuclear eccentricity and circularity in senescent fibroblasts (p < 0.01). Conversely, metformin with or without phytocannabinoids did not show any beneficial effects on functional activity, while rapamycin inhibited cell viability (p < 0.01) and the speed of wound healing (p < 0.001).

Therefore, triacetylresveratrol and cannabidiol can be a valuable source of biologically active substances used in aging and more studies using animals to confirm the efficacy of cannabidiol combined with triacetylresveratrol should be performed.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35955938/

“We, for the first time, show that application of TRSV in combination with CBD constitutes a very promising anti-aging and regenerative regimen that can potentially be used for treatment or/and prevention of appearance of aging spots and treating cutaneous wounds. Moreover, we found pCBs alone appeared to be highly efficacious as an anti-aging treatment. Further work should study and test pCBs alone, as well as TRSV in combination with CBD as anti-aging remedies.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/15/8804/htm

Intrathecal Actions of the Cannabis Constituents Δ(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol in a Mouse Neuropathic Pain Model

ijms-logo

“Background: The psychoactive and non-psychoactive constituents of cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), synergistically reduce allodynia in various animal models of neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, THC-containing drugs also produce substantial side-effects when administered systemically. We examined the effectiveness of targeted spinal delivery of these cannabis constituents, alone and in combination.

Methods: The effect of acute intrathecal drug delivery on allodynia and common cannabinoid-like side-effects was examined in a mouse chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain.

Results: intrathecal THC and CBD produced dose-dependent reductions in mechanical and cold allodynia. In a 1:1 combination, they synergistically reduced mechanical and cold allodynia, with a two-fold increase in potency compared to their predicted additive effect. Neither THC, CBD nor combination THC:CBD produced any cannabis-like side-effects at equivalent doses. The anti-allodynic effects of THC were abolished and partly reduced by cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists AM281 and AM630, respectively. The anti-allodynic effects of CBD were partly reduced by AM630.

Conclusions: these findings indicate that intrathecal THC and CBD, individually and in combination, could provide a safe and effective treatment for nerve injury induced neuropathic pain.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35955774/

“The present findings indicate that intrathecal delivery of the phytocannabinoids THC and CBD reduces the mechanical and cold allodynia associated with a nerve injury induced model of neuropathic pain. Interestingly, THC and CBD acted synergistically to reduce allodynia, leading to a substantial increase in their anti-allodynic potency. In addition, both THC and CBD were devoid of the cannabis-like side-effects associated with the systemic delivery of THC-containing cannabinoids. These findings indicate that spinal delivery of the primary phytocannabinoids of the plant Cannabis sativa has potential in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/15/8649/htm

Medicinal Cannabis for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain: An Investigation of the Adverse Event Profile and Health-Related Quality of Life Impact of an Oral Formulation

Karger Publishers Further Expands into Open Access and Open Science | STM  Publishing News

“Introduction: Medicinal cannabis is prescribed in Australia for patients with chronic refractory pain conditions. However, measures of safety and effectiveness of different cannabinoids are lacking. We designed an observational study to capture effectiveness, adverse events (AEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures in patients prescribed an oral medicinal cannabis formulation at Cannabis Access Clinics through the Cannabis Access Clinics Observational study (CACOS).

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate effectiveness, reported AEs, and change in patient-reported outcomes in individuals prescribed a cannabinoid oil formulation for management of chronic pain.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on patients prescribed an oil formulation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol for pain symptoms of at least 3-month duration. Clinician-reported AEs were organized by system, organ, class, and frequency. Analysis of patient-reported responses to a questionnaire was conducted using published minimal clinically important differences to determine meaningful change in HRQoL over time.

Results: More than half (n = 91/151, 60.3%) of the participants experienced at least one AE during the observation period (mean 133 ± 116 days). No serious AEs were reported. Patient-reported pain impact scores were significantly reduced across the cohort (p = 0.034), and pain intensity scores verged on significance (p = 0.053). The majority of patients saw meaningful improvements in sleep (49.3%) and fatigue (35.6%).

Conclusion: This analysis presents real-world data collected as part of standard of care. More than one-third of patients benefited from oral medicinal cannabis, which is impactful given the refractory nature of their pain. Amelioration of the impact of pain confirms continued prescribing of this formulation and validates our observational methodology as a tool to determine the therapeutic potency of medicinal cannabinoids.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35950052/

“This is a clinically relevant finding considering that this patient cohort comprises refractory cases where relief has not been obtained with existing medications, including opioids, NSAIDs, and steroids.”

https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/521492

Effects of Nabilone on Sleep Outcomes in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Post-hoc Analysis of NMS-Nab Study

“Background: The synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol analogue nabilone improved overall non-motor symptom (NMS) burden in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients in comparison to placebo.

Objectives: To characterize the effects of nabilone on different sleep outcomes in PD patients.

Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the controlled, double-blind, enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal NMS-Nab study to assess the effects of nabilone on sleep outcomes in study participants who reported clinically-relevant sleep problems (MDS-UPDRS-1.7 ≥ 2 points).

Results: After open-label nabilone administration, 77.4% reported no relevant sleep problem. In the withdrawal phase of the trial, the MDS-UPDRS-1.7. and the NMS-Scale Domain 2 (i.e., Sleep/Fatigue) significantly worsened only in PD patients in the placebo group, which was mostly driven by a significant worsening of insomnia (question 5 of the NMS-Scale Domain 2).

Conclusions: This post-hoc analysis of the NMS-Nab trial suggests that nabilone has beneficial effects on sleep outcomes in PD patients experiencing sleep problems at baseline.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35937495/

“Despite the limitations, we found positive effect of nabilone on clinically-relevant sleep problems in PD.”

https://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mdc3.13471

Synthetic cannabinoid poisonings and access to the legal cannabis market: findings from US national poison centre data 2016-2019

Publication Cover

“Aim: To investigate trends in synthetic cannabinoid exposures reported to United States (US) poison control centres, and their association with status of state cannabis legalisation.

Methods: A retrospective study of National Poison Data System (NPDS) data from 2016 to 2019 identified and associated synthetic poisoning reports with annual state cannabis law and market status. State status was categorised as restrictive (cannabis illegal or limited medical legalisation), medical (allowing THC-containing medical cannabis use) and permissive (allowing non-medical use of THC-containing cannabis by adults). We categorised a subset of states with permissive policies by their implementation of legal adult possession/use and opening retail markets, on a quarterly basis. Mixed-effects Poisson regression models assessed synthetic exposures associated with legal status, first among all states using annual counts, and then among states that implemented permissive law alone using quarterly counts.

Results: A total of 7600 exposures were reported during the study period. Overall, reported synthetic exposures declined over time. Most reported exposures (64.8%) required medical attention, and 61 deaths were documented. State implementation of medical cannabis law was associated with 13% fewer reported annual exposures. Adoption of permissive state cannabis policy was independently and significantly associated with 37% lower reported annual synthetic exposures, relative to restrictive policies (IRR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79). Among states with permissive law during the period, implementation of legal adult possession/use was associated with 22% fewer reported quarterly exposures. Opening of retail markets was associated with 36% fewer reported exposures, relative to states with medical cannabis only.

Conclusions: Adoption of permissive cannabis law was associated with significant reductions in reported synthetic cannabinoid exposures. More permissive cannabis law may have the unintended benefit of reducing both motivation and harms associated with use of synthetic cannabis products.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35942512/

“The gradual reduction of prohibitions against plant-based cannabis offers an opportunity to study use of cannabis and powerful synthetic analogues that may have been used as natural cannabis substitutes. Our study identified an association between more liberal policies (legalisation) for natural cannabis and declines in reported synthetic cannabinoid poisonings. This finding suggests a potential effect of policy change on substance use behaviours that may have long-term public health implications.”

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2022.2099887

Cannabis Use and Sinonasal Symptoms in US Adults

Medflixs - JAMA Otolaryngology Formation

“Importance: Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit substance in the US and worldwide. Understanding the association between cannabis use and sinonasal symptoms may help clinicians and patients better understand the symptomatology associated with cannabis use.

Objective: To assess the association between frequency of cannabis use and presence of sinonasal symptoms in a nationally representative sample of US adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based, retrospective cross-sectional study included adults aged 20 to 69 years who had completed data on sinonasal symptoms and substance use for the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The data were analyzed in February 2022.

Exposures: Cannabis use frequency.

Main outcomes and measures: Presence of sinonasal symptoms, demographic information, and medical history were obtained from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey questionnaires. Presence of any sinonasal symptoms was defined as responding yes to any of a series of questions assessing rhinologic symptoms. Regular cannabis users were defined as using cannabis 15 or more times within the last 30 days. Nonregular users were defined as using cannabis fewer than 15 times within the last 30 days. Multivariable models were used to examine the association between frequency of cannabis use and presence of sinonasal symptoms while adjusting for demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities.

Results: The study included 2269 adults with a mean (SD) age of 36.5 (12.4) years (1207 women [53.2%]; 330 Asian [14.5%], 739 Black [32.6%], 461 Hispanic [20.3%], and 656 White [28.9%] individuals). The prevalence of sinonasal symptoms among regular cannabis users (45.0%; 95% Cl, 38.9%-51.1%) was lower than the prevalence among never users (64.5%; 95% Cl, 58.3%-68.8%). Compared with adults who had never used cannabis, regular cannabis users were less likely to have sinonasal symptoms (odds ratio, 0.22, 95% CI, 0.10-0.50). Current tobacco smokers were more likely to have sinonasal symptoms (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.17-3.28). The most common sinonasal symptoms reported were nasal congestion (62.8%; 95% Cl, 60.2%-65.4%) and change in smell (17.8%; 95% Cl, 15.2%-20.9%).

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study found that the prevalence of sinonasal symptoms was lower among regular cannabis users. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the association between cannabis use and sinonasal symptoms.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35900733/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/article-abstract/2794662

“SINONASAL SYMPTOMS LESS COMMON IN REGULAR CANNABIS USERS”

https://www.physiciansweekly.com/sinonasal-symptoms-less-common-in-regular-cannabis-users

Medical Cannabis Used as an Alternative Treatment for Chronic Pain Demonstrates Reduction in Chronic Opioid Use – A Prospective Study

Pain Physician:::::

“Background: Chronic opioid therapy (COT) has been used to treat many chronic pain conditions even with poor evidence for its long-term effectiveness. Medical cannabis has emerged with certain pain-relieving properties, which has led to questions as to its’ potential application, especially in relation to its effect on opioid use.

Objectives: This study investigates a proposed clinical context in offering medical cannabis as a treatment for chronic pain for those already using chronic opioid therapy. It then details patients’ daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) usage.

Study design: This single-center prospective study follows a group of patients trialing medical cannabis treatment for chronic pain that is already using COT in order to determine individual efficacy. Continued medical cannabis treatment was a decision made by the patient, after trialing medical cannabis, to either continue medical cannabis along with COT at a reduced daily MME, or to revert back to their previous COT regimen.

Setting: This study was performed at the Allegheny Health Network Institute for Pain Medicine in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The state of Pennsylvania legalized medical cannabis in April of 2016, and it became available to patients in February of 2018 through medical dispensaries.

Methods: One hundred and fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria, with the majority of those excluded due to not being treated with COT. Of the 115 who chose to undergo a medical cannabis trial in addition to their COT, 75 chose to remain certified for medical cannabis as they had significant pain relief and subsequently weaned down on opioids. Additionally, of the 115 choosing to undergo a medical cannabis trial, 30 chose to be decertified due to ineffectiveness or side effects, and those were placed back on their COT regimen. The other 10 were not included for other denoted reasons. Compliance was monitored through urine drug screens (UDS).

Results: There was a 67.1% average decrease in daily MME/patient from 49.9 to 16.4 MME at the first follow-up. There was a 73.3% decrease in MME at second follow-up from 49.9 to 13.3 MME with an ANOVA analysis denoting a significant difference of P < 0.0001.

Limitations: The period of follow-up presented at this point includes their first 6 months of treatment with medical cannabis and COT concomitantly.

Conclusions: Presenting medical cannabis to chronic pain patients on COT should be done in the context of a patient choice between medical cannabis WITH decrement of COT or continued current dose of COT in order to maximize effectiveness in opioid reduction as well as to limit polypharmacy concerns regarding medical cannabis. Allowing for a temporary short-term period where patients may trial medical cannabis, while concomitantly gradually weaning their COT, is also essential in determining medical cannabis’ individual effectiveness for that patient’s specific type of chronic pain, which should serve to maximize long-term opioid reduction results and hence decrease opioid-related overdose deaths.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35051158/

https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/linkout?issn=&vol=25&page=E113