Category Archives: Uncategorized

Role of Endocannabinoid System Perturbation in Organophosphate-Mediated Metabolic Impairment and Neuroinflammation

Posted on by

“Organophosphates have been used for decades as pesticides, insecticides and herbicides, both in agricultural and industrial settings. However, their toxic effects on multiple body systems limit their safety. The clinical presentation of organophosphate toxicity varies depending on the route and duration of exposure. Although most research is focused on their cholinergic toxicity, emerging evidence points to their crucial contribution to metabolic dysfunction, including Type 2 diabetes and neuroinflammation.

Beyond acetylcholinesterase inhibition, recent research highlights the potential role of organophosphates in disrupting endocannabinoid signalling, particularly by affecting endogenous ligands that modulate G protein-coupled receptors. This dysregulation may contribute to organophosphate-induced metabolic disturbances and inflammation.

This review aims to explore how chronic subtoxic exposure to organophosphates contributes to metabolic syndrome and neuroinflammation through disruption of insulin and endocannabinoid signalling. It highlights the role of the endocannabinoid system in mediating these effects and evaluates its potential as a therapeutic target in organophosphate-induced toxicity.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41668464

Plain language summary

“Organophosphates (OPs), commonly used as pesticides, have been shown to adversely affect both metabolism and brain health by disrupting the endocannabinoid system (ECS), a critical regulatory network involved in inflammation, energy balance, and neural function. Chronic, low‐dose exposure to OPs can alter ECS enzymes and signalling pathways, contributing to insulin resistance, obesity and neuroinflammation. These metabolic disturbances may play a key role in the development of neurodegenerative outcomes associated with OP toxicity. This review aims to examine the interplay between OPs exposure and ECS disruption, emphasizing the ECS role in pathogenesis and its potential as a therapeutic target.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70198

Anti-inflammatory and analgesic potential of minor cannabinoids in vivo

Posted on by

“The cannabis plant produces many bioactive compounds, including the major cannabinoids THC and CBD, and many lesser studied “minor” phytocannabinoids including cannabinol (CBN), cannabichromene (CBC), cannabicyclol (CBL), and cannabigerol (CBG). These compounds are touted for various ailments, including pain, inflammation, and anxiety, but experimental data on their effects are lacking, especially that of CBL, which has yet to be assessed in vivo.

Methods

To assess in vivo activity, adult male and female C57BL/6J mice were administered each compound and tested repeatedly in the tetrad battery. The potential analgesic effects in chronic pain states were assessed using the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced hindpaw inflammatory pain and chronic constriction injury (CCI) neuropathic pain paradigms. Lastly, to address common psychological comorbidities of pain, CBN, CBL, and CBG were assessed in the tail suspension and marble burying tests.

Results

Cannabinol (≥ 25 mg/kg) induced classic cannabinoid effects, including acute antinociception. These effects were differentially and partially blocked by selective antagonism of CB1, adenosine A2A, or TRPV1 receptors. CBL (≥ 50 mg/kg) induced hypothermia that was fully blocked by A2A antagonism but had no apparent CB1-mediated activity. LPS-induced edema and paw proinflammatory cytokine levels were reduced by either CBN or CBL (100 mg/kg). CCI-induced cold allodynia was attenuated by either CBN (≥ 50 mg/kg) or CBL (100 mg/kg), but only at high doses that also induce catalepsy and hypothermia. None of these minor cannabinoids displayed anxiolytic- or antidepressant-like activity without concomitant locomotor effects.

Conclusions

Together, these findings suggest that CBN produces anti-inflammatory effects via cannabinoid receptor-dependent and -independent pathways, whereas CBL acts primarily through CB receptor-independent mechanisms.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41680865

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42238-025-00384-7

Health-related quality of life in patients receiving medicinal cannabis: systematic review and meta-analysis of primary research findings 2015-2025

Posted on by

“Purpose: The global burden of chronic health conditions is significant. Medicinal cannabis (MC) is a legalised treatment option for patients with chronic health conditions in some countries. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an important patient-reported outcome across all chronic health conditions. We aimed to determine how studies of MC therapy justify, measure, and report HRQL, and assess the current evidence for HRQL following MC treatment.

Methods: Systematic review searching AMED, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cinahl, and PsycINFO from Jan 2015 to Apr 2025. Studies using validated HRQL measures pre-, and post-MC treatment for any chronic health condition were included. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Completeness of HRQL reporting was evaluated. Meta-analyses for short-term (2-weeks to 3-months), medium-term (> 3 to < 12-months), and long-term (≥ 12-months) HRQL outcomes were conducted, with Risk of Bias (RoB) assessed in randomised control trials (RCTs).

Results: Of 16,674 retrieved citations, 64 studies were retained for analysis:12 RCTs; 38 cohort studies; 13 case series; 1 non-randomised experimental study. Thirty-nine studies (61%) provided justification for assessing HRQL and five (8%) provided HRQL definitions. Studies used generic (n = 52, 81%) or condition-specific (n = 12, 19%) HRQL measures, with EQ-5D-5L most commonly used. Meta-analyses: RCTs showed small short-term HRQL improvements (Cohen’s d = 0.30, p = 0.03), with some concerns or low RoB. For observational studies, HRQL improved in all follow-up periods (d = 0.43 to 0.74; all p < 0.001). HRQL improvement varied between, and within, different health conditions.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analyses of studies published between 2015 and 2025 found that few studies provided HRQL definitions, and a third of studies did not explain why they measured HRQL. To ensure appropriate measures are used for this important treatment outcome, future studies should define HRQL and justify the HRQL assessment in the context of research objectives.

Overall, improvements in HRQL were observed across studies of patients using MC.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41621036

Plain language summary

“Medicinal cannabis (MC) is a treatment option for patients in countries where prescribing MC is legal. Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) can mean different things to different people but remains an important treatment outcome for all patients, regardless of their specific health condition. HRQL varies depending on the context and measurement tool (questionnaire) used. We aimed to find out (1) how HRQL assessment is justified, defined and measured in MC research, and (2) if HRQL improves in patients prescribed MC. We looked at studies published over the past decade that reported HRQL in patients before and after MC treatment. Most studies (81%) used generic HRQL questionnaires (e.g., EuroQol Group: EQ-5D) and others used condition-specific questionnaires (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life: MSQoL-52).

Overall, HRQL improved in patients using MC.

However, only a few studies provided HRQL definitions, and a third of studies didn’t explain why they measured HRQL. This information is needed to ensure HRQL is measured and interpreted appropriately in future studies.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-026-04170-7

Cannabis sativa in the fight against drug-resistant bacteria and fungi

Posted on by

“Drug resistance in bacteria and fungi is a global threat to public health. The purpose of this publication is to review the latest scientific achievements, mainly from 2020-2025, concerning the use of hemp compounds from Cannabis sativa in combating drug-resistant bacterial and fungal infections.

The literature review confirms that C.sativa, a plant with a documented centuries-old therapeutic history, is a rich source of cannabinoids and terpenes that combat drug-resistant bacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and fungi: Cryptococcus neoformans, as well as species from the Candida and Aspergillus.

The potential of hemp compounds is based on their activity in interacting directly with pathogens by disrupting cell membrane integrity, eradicating biofilm, having a bactericidal effect on bacterial spores, acting synergistically, affecting host inflammatory pathways, and the human endocannabinoid system.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41607163

A CBD-rich hemp extract is superior to CBD alone in reducing relapse to methamphetamine-seeking in rats

Posted on by

“In preclinical models, the non-intoxicating cannabis component cannabidiol (CBD) reduces relapse to methamphetamine (Meth)-seeking and Meth-induced hyperactivity in rats.

Cannabis products containing multiple cannabinoids (“full spectrum”) may offer greater therapeutic potential than single cannabinoid (“isolate”) products.

However, few studies tested this. This study examined whether a hemp extract (HE) containing multiple cannabinoids might be superior to CBD alone in reducing Meth-induced behavioural sensitisation and relapse, and whether serotonin 1 A receptors (5-HT1A) are involved.

Male Sprague-Dawley rats self-administered either Meth or sucrose via lever press, followed by extinction and reinstatement by Meth injection (1 mg/kg; i.p.) or sucrose access. Rats received vehicle, CBD isolate (80 mg/kg), HE (containing 2.5 mg/kg of CBD and other phytocannabinoids), or HE with CBD added to match the 80 mg/kg amount of the CBD isolate (CBD + HE condition). The 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100635 was co-administered to assess receptor involvement. Separate rats were tested for conditioned place preference (CPP) to assess possible intrinsic rewarding properties of the cannabinoids. A final group was tested for Meth-induced behavioural sensitisation.

All CBD containing treatments reduced Meth-primed reinstatement, with HE and CBD + HE more effective than CBD isolate.

There was no effect of any treatment on reacquisition of sucrose seeking. WAY-100635 did not block the effects of any treatment. Neither cannabinoid treatment produced CPP. All treatments reduced the expression of Meth-induced sensitised hyperactivity with CBD + HE showing some superiority over CBD or HE alone.

This study suggests that CBD + HE may be more effective than CBD in reducing Meth relapse-like behaviour.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41605363

“CBD-rich hemp extract surpasses CBD alone in reducing relapse to Meth-seeking.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584626000254?via%3Dihub

Cannabidiol Mitigates Pollution-Induced Inflammatory, Oxidative, and Barrier Damage in Ex Vivo Human Skin

Posted on by

“Airborne particulate matter (PM) is a major environmental pollutant that accelerates skin aging, inflammation, and barrier impairment.

Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid derived from Cannabis sativa, has shown anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective effects, yet its role in protecting full-thickness human skin from pollution-induced damage remains unclear.

In this study, human full-thickness ex vivo skin explants were topically exposed to PM (0.54 mg/cm2) and treated with CBD (6.4 mM) administered via the culture medium for 48 h. Proinflammatory mediators (interleukin-6, IL-6; matrix metalloproteinase-1, MMP-1; cyclooxygenase-2, COX-2), oxidative stress markers (reactive oxygen species, ROS; 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, 8-OHdG), the xenobiotic sensor aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), extracellular matrix proteins (procollagen type I C-peptide, PIP; fibrillin), and the barrier protein filaggrin were quantified using ELISA and immunofluorescence.

PM exposure triggered significant inflammation, oxidative stress, AhR induction, extracellular matrix degradation, and barrier disruption. CBD selectively counteracted these effects by reducing IL-6, MMP-1, COX-2, ROS, and 8-OHdG levels, downregulating AhR expression, and restoring PIP, fibrillin, and filaggrin expression. No measurable effects were observed in unstressed control tissues.

These results demonstrate that CBD protects human skin from PM-induced molecular damage and supports its potential as a functional bioactive ingredient for anti-pollution applications.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41594552

“Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid from Cannabis sativa, has shown antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and barrier-supporting effects “

“This study provides compelling evidence that CBD protects against pollution-induced skin damage by modulating inflammatory, oxidative, and xenobiotic stress pathways. In addition to biochemical modulation, CBD restored extracellular matrix and barrier integrity, supporting its potential as a functional ingredient for promoting skin health in urban environments.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/16/1/10

Effects of Cannabidiol on Bone Health: A Comprehensive Scoping Review

Posted on by

“Background/objectives: Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychoactive constituent of Cannabis sativa, which has potential skeletal benefits through modulation of bone cell function and inflammatory signalling. However, evidence of its effects and mechanisms in bone health remains fragmented. This scoping review summarised the current findings on the impact of CBD on bone outcomes and its mechanisms of action. 

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in October 2025 for original studies published in English, with the primary objective of examining the effects of CBD on bone health, regardless of study design. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 primary studies were included. Data on model design, CBD formulation, treatment parameters, bone-related outcomes, and proposed mechanisms were extracted and analysed descriptively. 

Results: Among the studies included, eleven demonstrated beneficial effects of CBD on bone formation, mineralisation, callus quality, or strength; eleven showed mixed outcomes; and two demonstrated no apparent benefit. Previous studies have shown that CBD suppresses bone resorption by reducing osteoclast differentiation and activity while promoting osteoblast proliferation and matrix deposition. Mechanistically, CBD’s effects involve activation of cannabinoid receptor 2, modulation of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand/osteoprotegerin pathway, and regulation of osteoblastogenic and osteoclastogenic signalling through bone morphogenetic protein, Wnt, mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor-κB, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signalling. The anti-inflammatory and antioxidant actions of CBD further contribute to a favourable bone microenvironment. 

Conclusions: Preclinical evidence suggests that CBD has a bone-protective role through multifaceted pathways that enhance osteoblast function and suppress osteoclast activity. Nevertheless, robust human trials are necessary to confirm its efficacy, determine its optimal dosing, and clarify its long-term safety.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41595744

“This scoping review demonstrates that CBD exerts multifaceted and predominantly positive effects on bone biology. CBD enhances osteoblast differentiation, supports matrix formation, and suppresses osteoclast-driven resorption. These effects are mediated through a network of anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and receptor-dependent mechanisms.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/14/1/208


The Effect of Cannabidiol on Nociceptive Behaviour and the Endocannabinoid System in an Incisional Wound Model

Posted on by

“Background/Objectives: Wound-related pain is a common, yet inadequately managed condition, and new therapeutic strategies are warranted. Limited data suggests that phytocannabinoids and cannabis may alleviate wound-related pain; however, further studies are required. This study investigated the effects of systemic administration of cannabidiol (CBD) on nociceptive behaviour following dorsum incision and on the endocannabinoid system. 

Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (150-200 g on arrival, n = 9/group) underwent a 1.2 cm incision on the hairy skin of the dorsum or sham procedure. Back and hind paw mechanical withdrawal thresholds were assessed at baseline and post-surgery/sham days (PSDs) 1, 4, 7, and 8 using manual and electronic von Frey tests, respectively. On PSD 8, the effect of a single acute administration of CBD (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg, i.p.) on mechanical hypersensitivity in the dorsum and hind paws was assessed. The levels of endocannabinoids and N-acylethanolamines in the plasma and discrete brain regions following CBD administration were analysed. 

Results: Robust mechanical hypersensitivity was evident in the dorsum and hind paws following the incision. CBD (3 mg/kg) partially attenuated primary mechanical hypersensitivity in the dorsum, in a site- and dose-specific manner. CBD had no effect on secondary mechanical hypersensitivity. CBD did not alter the levels of endocannabinoids or N-acylethanolamines, but in rats that received CBD (3 mg/kg), levels of 2-AG were lower in the contralateral amygdala and levels of AEA were higher in the contralateral lumbar spinal cord, compared to the ipsilateral sides. 

Conclusions: These data provide evidence for antinociceptive effects of CBD in a model of incisional wound-related pain. Further research on CBD’s mechanism(s) of action is warranted. The potential antinociceptive effects of other phytocannabinoids in this model should also be investigated.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41599645

“Cannabidiol (CBD) is a phytocannabinoid found in Cannabis sativa L.”

“These results indicate dose- and site-specific antinociceptive effects of CBD in a rat model of incisional wound-related pain, providing preclinical evidence to support the contention that CBD may have therapeutic potential for alleviating incisional wound-related pain.”

“These results also indicate that investigation of the potential antinociceptive effects of other phytocannabinoids in this model of incisional wound-related pain is warranted.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/19/1/43


Toxicological evaluation and preliminary phytochemical characterisation of a Nigerian Cannabis sativa chemovar

Posted on by

“Objectives: Different Cannabis sativa chemovars produce diverse pharmacological and behavioral effects. With the widespread use of cannabis in Nigeria, detailed toxicological effects of Nigerian chemovars are lacking. This study aimed to identify phytocannabinoids and investigate the toxic effects of an indigenous C. sativa.

Materials and methods: The plant samples were air-dried, powdered, extracted with ethanol, and characterized (phytochemical screening, Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)). Acute and subacute toxicity tests were done following Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) protocols.

Results: Screening showed appreciable levels of alkaloids, tannins, saponins, cardiac glycosides, and phenol. FTIR analysis indicated functional groups and chemical linkages like alcohols, fatty acids, alkynes, ketones, and esters, and 11 phytocannabinoids with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in abundance (35.78%) reported by GC-MS. Acute toxicity test indicated an oral lethal dose (LD50) value of ˃5000 mg/kg, a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) dose of ≤300 mg/kg, and a significant (P<0.05) decrease in the weight of animals in the 2000 mg/kg treatment group. The sub-acute toxicity test showed significantly (P<0.05) decreased ALP and ALT levels at 25 mg/kg body weight, and significantly lower triglyceride (P<0.01) and LDL (P<0.05) levels. Urea and some haematological parameters were significantly (P<0.05) higher in the 250 mg/kg group. Also, we observed mild to moderate necrosis in the excised pancreas and liver, and mild tubular changes in the kidney.

Conclusion: This suggests that our indigenous variety of C. sativa may be considered safe following oral consumption.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41586191

Ferroptosis under fire: cannabidiol mitigates iron-dependent injury in differentiated human neuroblastoma cells following oxygen-glucose deprivation

Posted on by

“Background: Perinatal hypoxia-ischemia is a major cause of long-term neurological impairments in newborns, with ferroptosis recognized as a key mechanism of injury.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid with antioxidant and neuroprotective properties.

CBD is a potential modulator of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage, however its effects on ferroptosis-related pathways remain unclear.

Purpose: In this study, we examined whether CBD can alleviate ferroptosis-associated damage in differentiated human neuroblastoma (neuron-like SH-SY5Y) cell model of hypoxic-ischemic injury.

Study design: Differentiated human neuroblastoma cells were exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) to simulate hypoxic-ischemic conditions.

Methods: Neuron-like SH-SY5Y cells were subjected to OGD to induce hypoxic-ischemic injury. CBD was applied to assess its neuroprotective effects. Oxidative stress markers, antioxidant enzyme activity, transcription factor activation Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2), iron metabolism proteins (ferroportin), hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression were evaluated.

Results: CBD application significantly reduced oxidative stress by improving antioxidant capacity and lowering total oxidant status. CBD also preserved the expression and enzymatic activity of glutathione peroxidase 4, a central enzyme protecting against lipid peroxidation, and enhanced the activation of Nrf2, a key regulator of antioxidant defence. Additionally, CBD prevented OGD-induced downregulation of ferroportin, potentially supporting iron efflux and reducing ferroptotic risk. HIF-1α and its downstream target VEGF were upregulated under hypoxic conditions, and CBD further enhanced VEGF expression.

Conclusion: CBD mitigates ferroptosis by modulating redox balance, antioxidant defence, and iron metabolism, supporting its potential role as a therapeutic strategy for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41581443

“These findings support the potential use of CBD as a therapeutic agent for hypoxia-related ferroptotic injury, such as neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0944711326001078?via%3Dihub