“Background: Perioperative tobacco use has been identified as an independent risk factor for adverse events after total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is unknown if perioperative cannabis users share similar levels of risk for adverse events after THA.

Methods: Patients undergoing THA were identified from the 2010 to 2021 PearlDiver M151 administrative data set. Patient subcohorts were categorized based on presence or absence of cannabis and/or tobacco use, as determined by coding. These subcohorts were equally matched based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores to form groups of nonusers, tobacco users, tobacco and cannabis users, as well as cannabis users. The incidences of adverse events within 90 days postoperatively were obtained and compared using univariate and multivariate analyses that controlled for age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Bonferroni correction was applied.

Results: Of 494,431 THA patients, nonusers were 442,000 (89.40%), tobacco users 46,925 (9.50%), tobacco and cannabis users 3,390 (0.69%), and cannabis users 2,116 (0.43%). After matching, there were 1,897 in each group. By multivariate analyses, tobacco-only users were at significantly greater risk of severe adverse events, sepsis, and pneumonia (P < 0.001 for each). Tobacco and cannabis users were at significantly greater risk of severe adverse events, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and readmission (P < 0.001 for each). Conversely, cannabis-only users were not at significantly greater risk for any of the combined or individual adverse events assessed.

Discussion: This study confirmed that THA patients with tobacco-only use were at greater risk of perioperative adverse events and that these were relatively similar to those with concurrent tobacco and cannabis use. However, cannabis-only users were not at greater risk, a finding that is of clinical interest given the evolving access and increasing use of this agent.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41144882/

https://journals.lww.com/jaaos/abstract/9900/unlike_tobacco_users,_documented_cannabis_users.1503.aspx

“Background: Cannabinoids, such as tetrahydrocannabinol (∆-9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have been proposed for topical medicinal use as a treatment for tissue inflammation. In this context, keratinocytes are the first cells that encounter cannabinoids. The present study evaluated the dose-response relationship between different concentrations of THC and CBD and their effects on human skin and gingival keratinocyte growth and migration, to identify suitable non-toxic concentrations of cannabinoids. 

Methods: Human gingival and skin keratinocytes were exposed to CBD or THC at different concentrations for 24 h, and then cell adhesion, morphology, and growth/viability were assessed. The effects of cannabinoids on keratinocyte migration were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 h. Cytotoxicity of CBD and THC against keratinocyte cells was assessed using an LHD cytotoxicity test. Cell metabolic profiles were evaluated using Mito and Glyco Stress Assays. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis derivatives were assessed against LPS-stimulated keratinocytes. Data analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. 

Results: Only high concentrations (10 and 20 μg/mL) of CBD and THC were cytotoxic to gingival and skin keratinocytes, reduced cell adhesion and growth, and were associated with a delay in cell migration after wounding. Cells exposed to high concentrations (20 μg/mL) of cannabinoids displayed high levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity and changes in mitochondrial activities. CBD induced a metabolic shift in skin keratinocyte cells toward glycolysis, while reducing mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. In contrast, THC did not alter the metabolic profile of skin keratinocytes. Interestingly, both CBD and THC significantly reduced the LPS-induced inflammatory response by decreasing secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 by gingival and skin keratinocytes. 

Conclusions: Gingival and skin keratinocytes interact differently with cannabinoids. Only high concentrations of cannabinoids were cytotoxic, suggesting that the use of low concentrations of CBD and THC for topical medicinal applications may help control tissue inflammation.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41153821/

“Overall, results from this study suggest that CBD and THC may be used in different formulations (e.g., as a moisturizing lotion or spray) in order to manage tissue inflammation caused by pathological conditions, such as lichen planus, dermatitis, and psoriasis.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/10/2541

“Objective: This study aims to evaluate preclinical studies on the effects and toxicity of cannabis-derived compounds against Plasmodium sp.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and LILACS databases until December 2024. Studies that assessed the activity or toxicity of cannabis against Plasmodium sp. in in vitro or in vivo studies were included. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction and methodological assessment.

Results: Eight studies published between 2001 and 2022 were included, with the majority conducted in North America (n = 5). Most in vitro studies focused on assessing antimalarial activity through half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀), which ranged from 0.16 to 4.1 μg/mL, indicating mild to high activity.

For the in vivo studies, all reported positive effects, including moderate antimalarial activity and disease tolerance. The toxicity profile of these compounds has not been extensively studied, and most studies present an unknown or unclear risk of bias due to insufficient methodological information.

Conclusions: Future studies should provide more comprehensive details on study design and further validate these findings, especially concerning toxicity.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41093288/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tmi.70044

“Introduction: Cannabis sativa L. has been used for thousands of years to treat intestinal and uterine diseases and as an anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antiepileptic, among others. This study aimed to conduct preclinical studies based on the ethnopharmacological properties of C. sativa.

Methods: For this purpose, the police and health authorities provided the raw plant material, and a crude ethanolic extract of the aerial parts of C. sativa (APCs) was produced, which was subsequently chemically analyzed using combined chromatographic and spectrometric methods. Subsequently, APCs were administered to Swiss mice and Wistar rats for evaluation using the open field test, acetic acid-induced abdominal contraction model, hot plate test, formalin test, carrageenan-induced paw edema, Saccharomyces cerevisiae-induced fever, and primary dysmenorrhea models.

Results: Chemical analysis suggests the presence of classic cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol, tetrahydrocannabinol, and cannabigerol, as well as flavonoids and alkaloids. The doses used in the open field test were 1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg (gavage, po), with the last two doses responsible for reducing mobility and inducing hypothermia in the animals. In subsequent pharmacological protocols, the doses used were 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg (gavage, po). In the abdominal contraction model, the number of writhing events was reduced by APCs at a dose of 10 mg/kg [median 0.5 (Q25 = 0; Q75 = 5.75, p < 0.05)]. In the hot plate test, the doses of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg increased the latency time to 17.67 ± 1.33, 18.50 ± 1.31, and 17.33 ± 1.69 s (p < 0.05), respectively. In the formalin test, the effect was restricted to the first phase, with values of 42.33 ± 7.588, 45.50 ± 6.657, and 39.50 ± 7.869 s (p < 0.05) in paw-licking time. In paw edema, the doses of 1 and 3 mg/kg were more constant, restricting the volume to 0.168 ± 0.004 and 0.150 ± 0.004 mL (p < 0.05), respectively. In dysmenorrhea, the doses of 3 and 10 mg/kg reduced abdominal contractions [0 (Q25 = 0; Q75 = 3.0) and 1.0 (Q25 = 0; Q75 = 3.0)].

Conclusion: APCs at the tested doses did not promote an antipyretic effect. These data indicate that APCs have antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-dysmenorrheal effects in animal models.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41089847/

“Cannabis sativa L. is a plant from the family Cannabaceae and one of the oldest to be domesticated in the world, with its use dating back to approximately 12,000 years in the Central Asian region.”

“C. sativa has a variety of indications in traditional medicine, in the most diverse forms of use (tea, smoke, vapor, etc.), and is used as a wound healing agent, analgesic, anticonvulsant, hypnotic, tranquilizer, anesthetic, anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, antiparasitic, antispasmodic, digestive, appetite stimulant, diuretic, aphrodisiac, antitussive, and expectorant.”

“Our results suggest that APCs contain classic cannabinoids, flavonoids, and alkaloids, and that classic cannabinoids, THC, and CBD are present. The administration of APCs promoted behavioral changes in the animals consistent with the pharmacological effects of these substances, such as reduced ambulation and hypothermic effect at doses of 30 and 100 mg/kg. In pharmacological studies, antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-dysmenorrheal effects were observed in different experimental models and in the 1–10 mg/kg dose range; however, the APCs failed to show an antipyretic effect at these doses.”

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1677987/full