“The CB2 cannabinoid receptor remains a tantalizing, but unrealized therapeutic target. CB2 receptor ligands belong to varied structural classes and display extreme functional selectivity. Here we have screened diverse CB2 receptor ligands at canonical (inhibition of adenylyl cyclase) and non-canonical (arrestin recruitment) pathways. The non-classical cannabinoid, CP55940 was the most potent agonist for both pathways, while the classical cannabinoid ligand JWH133 was the most efficacious agonist amongst all the ligands profiled in cyclase assays. In the cyclase assay, other classical cannabinoids showed little (Δ9THC, KM233) to no efficacy (L759633 and L759656). Most aminoalkylindoles including WIN55212-2 were moderate efficacy agonists. The cannabilactone AM1710 was equi-efficacious to CP55940 to inhibit adenylyl cyclase, albeit with lower potency. In the arrestin recruitment assays, all classical cannabinoid ligands failed to recruit arrestins, indicating a bias towards G protein coupling for this class of compound. All aminoalkylindoles tested, except for WIN55212-2 and UR144, failed to recruit arrestin. WIN55212-2 was a low efficacy agonist for arrestin recruitment, while UR144 was arrestin biased with no significant inhibition of cyclase. Endocannabinoids were G protein biased with no arrestin recruitment. The diarylpyrazole antagonist, SR144528 was an inverse agonist in cyclase and arrestin recruitment assays while the aminoalkylindole AM630 and carboxamide JTE907 were inverse agonists in cyclase but low efficacy agonists in arrestin recruitment assays. Thus CB2 receptor ligands display strong and varied functional selectivity at both pathways. Therefore extreme care must be exercised when using these compounds to infer the role of CB2 receptors in vivo.”
www.thctotalhealthcare.com
