A National Survey of Marijuana Use Among U.S. Adults According to Obesity Status, 2016-2022

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background and Objective: Research has linked marijuana use with lower body mass index (BMI). The current study explores the correlation between marijuana use on BMI in the general U.S. population. It reports the prevalence of marijuana in adults in relation to BMI, overall and across the levels of important variables. 

Materials and Methods: This study used a probability sample of U.S. adults 18 years of age and older from the 2016 through 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a telephone-administered survey. The survey collects data from a representative sample regarding health-related risk behaviors, chronic health conditions, and use of preventive services. The primary outcome variables are current (at least once in the last 30 days) and daily (at least 20 of the last 30 days) marijuana use. 

Results: The study sample consists of 735,921 participants in the surveys that completed the optional module on marijuana use. Prevalence of marijuana use in adults doubled during the study period (7.48% to 14.91%). The increase directly corresponds with a shift toward legalization of medical and recreational marijuana. On average, the prevalence of use is 9% higher when medical marijuana is legal and 81% higher when recreational marijuana is legal (vs. not legal). For obese individuals, prevalence of current marijuana use is 35% lower than for nonobese individuals on average. Lower prevalence of marijuana use in obese individuals is consistently observed across the levels of certain demographic variables, employment status, tobacco smoking history, marijuana legalization status, and certain medical conditions (asthma, arthritis, and depression). In 2022, the adjusted odds of current or daily marijuana use are significantly lower and similar among obese (vs. non-obese) (0.68, 0.69, respectively), such that reduced obesity does not require daily use. Similarly, the adjusted odds of current marijuana use decrease in similar fashion to daily marijuana use with higher BMI weight classification. 

Conclusion: Marijuana use is correlated with lower BMI. As legalization and prevalence of the drug in the U.S. increases, the prevalence of obesity may decline. However, clinicians should view this outcome along with the known health risks associated with marijuana use.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39158998/

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/can.2024.0069

β-Caryophyllene mitigates ischemic stroke-induced white matter lesions by inhibiting pyroptosis

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“β-Caryophyllene (BCP), a selective agonist for cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R), has demonstrated promising protective effects in various pathological conditions. However, the neuroprotective effects of BCP on white matter damage induced by ischemic stroke have not been elucidated previously.

In this study, we find that BCP not only improves sensorimotor and cognitive function via CB2R but also mitigates white matter lesions in mice following ischemic stroke. Furthermore, BCP enhances the viability of MO3.13 oligodendrocytes after oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation (OGD/R), attenuating OGD/R-induced cellular damage and pyroptosis. Notably, these protective effects of BCP are partially enhanced by the NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 and counteracted by the NLRP3 activator nigericin. In addition, nigericin significantly exacerbates neurological outcomes and increases white matter lesions following BCP treatment in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) mice.

These results suggest that BCP may ameliorate neurological deficits and white matter damage induced by cerebral ischemia through inhibiting NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39159913/

“In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence that BCP can enhance motor and cognitive function outcomes via activating CB2R, as well as promote white matter integrity after ischemic stroke. Significantly, this research establishes, for the first time, the crucial role of inhibiting NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis in the therapeutic effects of BCP post-ischemic stroke.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014482724003057?via%3Dihub

“Beta-caryophyllene is a dietary cannabinoid.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18574142

“β-caryophyllene (BCP) is a common constitute of the essential oils of numerous spice, food plants and major component in Cannabis.”   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23138934

Potential Neuroprotective Effect of the Endocannabinoid System on Parkinson’s Disease

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by alterations in motor capacity resulting from a decrease in the neurotransmitter dopamine due to the selective death of dopaminergic neurons of the nigrostriatal pathway. Unfortunately, conventional pharmacological treatments fail to halt disease progression; therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed, and currently, some are being investigated.

The endocannabinoid system (ECS), highly expressed in the basal ganglia (BG) circuit, undergoes alterations in response to dopaminergic depletion, potentially contributing to motor symptoms and the etiopathogenesis of PD. Substantial evidence supports the neuroprotective role of the ECS through various mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic effects. Therefore, the ECS emerges as a promising target for PD treatment.

This review provides a comprehensive summary of current clinical and preclinical evidence concerning ECS alterations in PD, along with potential pharmacological targets that may exert the protection of dopaminergic neurons.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39104613/

“Considering current evidence, the ECS emerges as a promising therapeutic target for managing PD, primarily owing to its neuroprotective effects, prominently mediated through anti-inflammatory mechanisms. This is particularly significant since neuroinflammation stands out as a hallmark of PD, and extensive preclinical studies have consistently demonstrated that modulating this inflammatory process mitigates the progression of dopaminergic neuronal death.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5519396

Oral Cannabis Extract for Secondary Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II/III Trial

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Purpose: The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-stage, phase II/III trial was to determine the efficacy of an oral cannabis extract in adults with refractory nausea and/or vomiting during moderately or highly emetogenic, intravenous chemotherapy despite guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis. Here, we report results of the prespecified combined analysis including the initial phase II and subsequent phase III components.

Patients and methods: Study treatment consisted of oral capsules containing either tetrahydrocannabinol 2.5 mg plus cannabidiol 2.5 mg capsules (THC:CBD) or matching placebo, taken three times a day from days -1 to 5, in addition to guideline-consistent antiemetics. The primary measure of effect was the difference in the proportions of participants with no vomiting or retching and no use of rescue medications (a complete response) during hours 0-120 after the first cycle of chemotherapy on study (cycle A).

Results: We recruited 147 evaluable of a planned 250 participants from 2016 to 2022. Background antiemetic prophylaxis included a corticosteroid and 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist in 97%, a neurokinin-1 antagonist in 80%, and olanzapine in 10%. THC:CBD compared with placebo improved the complete response rate from 8% to 24% (absolute difference 16%, 95% CI, 4 to 28, P = .01), with similar effects for absence of significant nausea, use of rescue medications, daily vomits, and the nausea scale on the Functional Living Index-Emesis quality-of-life questionnaire. More frequent bothersome adverse events of special interest included sedation (18% v 7%), dizziness (10% v 0%), and transient anxiety (4% v 1%). There were no serious adverse events attributed to THC:CBD.

Conclusion: THC:CBD is an effective adjunct for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting despite standard antiemetic prophylaxis, but was associated with additional adverse events. Drug availability, cultural attitudes, legal status, and preferences may affect implementation. Future analyses will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of THC:CBD.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39151115/

“In conclusion, an oral formulation of THC:CBD was an effective adjunct to standard antiemetics for prevention and treatment of refractory CINV, with adverse effects including sedation and dizziness, but no increase in serious adverse events. Our data support the claim that oral THC:CBD is an effective and safe option for the prevention of refractory CINV. Availability, access, affordability, cultural attitudes, societal barriers, and legal barriers may limit implementation.”

https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.01836

Perceptions in Orthopedic Surgery on the Use of Cannabis in Treating Pain: A Survey of Musculoskeletal Trauma Patients-Results From the Canadian POSIT Study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Objectives: To evaluate the patient-reported expectations regarding cannabis for pain following musculoskeletal (MSK) trauma and patients’ perceptions and attitudes regarding its use.

Design: A cross-sectional retrospective survey-based study.

Setting: Three orthopaedic clinics in Ontario (Level-1 trauma center, Level-2 trauma center, rehabilitation clinic).

Patients selection criteria: Adult patients presenting to the clinics from January 24, 2018, to March 7, 2018, with traumatic MSK injuries (fractures/dislocations and muscle/tendon/ligament injury) were administered an anonymous questionnaire on cannabis for MSK pain.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Primary outcome measure was the patients’ perceived effect of cannabis on MSK pain, reported on a continuous pain scale (0%-100%, 0 being no pain, and 100 unbearable pain). Secondary outcomes included preferences, such as administration route, distribution method, timing, and barriers (lack of knowledge, concerns for side effects/addiction, moral/religious opposition, etc.) regarding cannabis use.

Results: In total, 440 patients were included in this study, 217 (49.3%) of whom were female and 222 (50.5%) were male, with a mean age of 45.6 years (range 18-92 years, standard deviations 15.6). Patients estimated that cannabis could treat 56.5% (95% CI 54.0%-59.0%) of their pain and replace 46.2% (95% CI 42.8%-49.6%) of their current analgesics. Nearly one-third (131/430, 30.5%) reported that they had used medical cannabis and more than one-quarter (123/430, 28.6%) used it in the previous year. Most felt that cannabis may be beneficial to treat pain (304/334, 91.0%) and reduce opioid use (293/331, 88.5%). Not considering using cannabis for their injury (132/350, 37.7%) was the most common reason for not discussing cannabis with physicians. Higher reported pain severity (β = 0.2/point, 95% CI 0.1-0.3, P = 0.005) and previous medical cannabis use were associated with higher perceived pain reduction (β = 11.1, 95% CI 5.4-16.8, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: One in 3 orthopaedic trauma patients used medical cannabis. Patients considered cannabis could potentially be an effective option for managing traumatic MSK pain and believed that cannabis could reduce opioid usage following acute musculoskeletal trauma. These data will help inform clinicians discussing medical cannabis usage with orthopaedic trauma patients moving forward.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39150305/

https://journals.lww.com/jorthotrauma/abstract/2024/09000/perceptions_in_orthopedic_surgery_on_the_use_of.12.aspx

Integrating Lipidomics, Metabolomics, and Network Pharmacology to Reveal the Mechanism of Cannabidiol against Inflammation in High-Fat, High-Cholesterol Diet-Induced Mice

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Inflammation plays a critical role in the development of numerous diseases.

Cannabidiol (CBD), found in hemp, exhibits significant pharmacological activities. Accumulating evidence suggests that CBD has anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular protection effects, but the potential mechanisms require further exploration.

In this study, we aimed to reveal the mechanisms of CBD against high-fat, high-cholesterol (HFC) diet-induced inflammation combining metabolomics with network pharmacology.

First, plasma lipidomics results indicated that oxidized lipids could serve as potential biomarkers for HFC diet-induced inflammation, and CBD reversed the elevated levels of oxidized lipids. The HFC diet was also found to enhance intestinal permeability, facilitating the entry of lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) into the circulatory system and subsequently increasing systemic inflammation.

Additionally, cell metabolomic results indicated that CBD could reverse 10 important differential metabolites in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells. Using network pharmacology, we identified 49 core targets, and enrichment analysis revealed that arachidonic acid was the most significantly affected by CBD, which was closely associated with inflammation.

Further integrated analysis focused on three key targets, including PTGS2, ALOX5, and ALOX15. Molecular docking showed high affinities between key targets and CBD, and qPCR further demonstrated that CBD could reverse the mRNA expression of these key targets in RAW 264.7 cells.

Collectively, this finding integrates lipidomics and metabolomics with network pharmacology to elucidate the anti-inflammatory effects of CBD and validates key therapeutic targets.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39150414/

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c04994

CANDI: A Web Server for Predicting Molecular Targets and Pathways of Cannabis-Based Therapeutics

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Cannabis sativa with a rich history of traditional medicinal use, has garnered significant attention in contemporary research for its potential therapeutic applications in various human diseases, including pain, inflammation, cancer, and osteoarthritis. However, the specific molecular targets and mechanisms underlying the synergistic effects of its diverse phytochemical constituents remain elusive. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing targeted, effective cannabis-based therapies.

Methods: To investigate the molecular targets and pathways involved in the synergistic effects of cannabis compounds, we utilized DRIFT, a deep learning model that leverages attention-based neural networks to predict compound-target interactions. We considered both whole plant extracts and specific plant-based formulations. Predicted targets were then mapped to the Reactome pathway database to identify the biological processes affected. To facilitate the prediction of molecular targets and associated pathways for any user-specified cannabis formulation, we developed CANDI (Cannabis-derived compound Analysis and Network Discovery Interface), a web-based server. This platform offers a user-friendly interface for researchers and drug developers to explore the therapeutic potential of cannabis compounds.

Results: Our analysis using DRIFT and CANDI successfully identified numerous molecular targets of cannabis compounds, many of which are involved in pathways relevant to pain, inflammation, cancer, and other diseases. The CANDI server enables researchers to predict the molecular targets and affected pathways for any specific cannabis formulation, providing valuable insights for developing targeted therapies.

Conclusions: By combining computational approaches with knowledge of traditional cannabis use, we have developed the CANDI server, a tool that allows us to harness the therapeutic potential of cannabis compounds for the effective treatment of various disorders. By bridging traditional pharmaceutical development with cannabis-based medicine, we propose a novel approach for botanical-based treatment modalities.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39149470/

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-4744915/v1

The Medicinal Natural Products of Cannabis sativa Linn.: A Review

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Cannabis sativa is known among many cultures for its medicinal potential. Its complexity contributes to the historical application of various parts of the plant in ethno-medicines and pharmacotherapy. 

C. sativa has been used for the treatment of rheumatism, epilepsy, asthma, skin burns, pain, the management of sexually transmitted diseases, difficulties during child labor, postpartum hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal activity. However, the use of C. sativa is still limited, and it is illegal in most countries. Thus, this review aims to highlight the biological potential of the plant parts, as well as the techniques for the extraction, isolation, and characterization of C. sativa compounds.

The plant produces a unique class of terpenophenolic compounds, called cannabinoids, as well as non-cannabinoid compounds. The exhaustive profiling of bioactive compounds and the chemical characterization and analysis of C. sativa compounds, which modern research has not yet fully achieved, is needed for the consistency, standardization, and the justified application of Cannabis sativa products for therapeutic purposes.

Studies on the clinical relevance and applications of cannabinoids and non-cannabinoid phenols in the prevention and treatment of life-threatening diseases is indeed significant. Furthermore, psychoactive cannabinoids, when chemically standardized and administered under medical supervision, can be the legal answer to the use of C. sativa.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35268790/

https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/5/1689

Medical Cannabis Prescription Practices and Quality of Life in Thai Patients: A Nationwide Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Introduction: The legalization of cannabis in Thailand has renewed interest in its traditional medical use. This study aimed to explore the prescribing patterns of traditional practitioners and assess the impact of cannabis oil on patients’ quality of life, with a specific focus on comparing outcomes between cancer and non-cancer patients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study across 30 sites in 21 Thai provinces to analyze the use of “Ganja Oil,” a cannabis extract in 10% coconut oil, prescribed for symptoms like pain, anorexia, and insomnia across a diverse patient group, including cancer and migraines. Quality of life was assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and EQ-5D-5L at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months. The study included a predefined subgroup analysis to compare the effects on cancer versus non-cancer patients. Data management was facilitated through Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), with statistical analysis performed using Stata/MP.

Results: Among 21,284 participants, the mean age was 54.10 ± 15.32 years, with 52.49% being male. The baseline EQ-5D-5L index was 0.85 ± 0.24. Significant differences in EQ-5D-5L indices were seen between cancer patients (0.79 ± 0.32) and non-cancer patients (0.85 ± 0.23; p < 0.001). ESAS scores also differed significantly between these groups for all symptoms, except anxiety. The most frequent prescription of Ganja Oil was oral administration at bedtime (88.26%), with the predominant dosage being three drops daily, approximately 0.204 mg of tetrahydrocannabinol in total. Posttreatment, significant improvements were noted: the EQ-5D-5L index increased by 0.11 points (95% CI: 0.11, 0.11; p < 0.001) overall, 0.13 points (95% CI: 0.12, 0.14; p < 0.001) for cancer patients, and 0.11 points (95% CI: 0.10, 0.11; p < 0.001) for non-cancer patients. ESAS pain scores improved by -2.66 points (95% CI: -2.71, -2.61; p < 0.001) overall, -2.01 points (95% CI: -2.16, -1.87; p < 0.001) for cancer patients, and -2.75 points (95% CI: -2.80, -2.70; p < 0.001) for non-cancer patients, with similar significant improvements in other symptoms.

Conclusion: Our study indicates potential benefits of Ganja Oil for improving quality of life among Thai patients, as a complementary treatment. These findings must be viewed in light of the study’s design limitations. Further controlled studies are essential to ascertain its efficacy and inform dosing guidelines.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39144529/

“This nationwide study marks a substantial step forward in the comprehension of medical cannabis, particularly highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing the quality of life for patients in a real-world setting. It underscores the importance of identifying optimal dosages and the potential benefits of integrating traditional medicine practices with conventional medicine approaches.”

https://karger.com/mca/article/7/1/125/909963/Medical-Cannabis-Prescription-Practices-and

Beneficial Consequences of One-Month Oral Treatment with Cannabis Oil on Cardiac Hypertrophy and the Mitochondrial Pool in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Introduction: It has been demonstrated the dysregulation of the cardiac endocannabinoid system in cardiovascular diseases. Thus, the modulation of this system through the administration of phytocannabinoids present in medicinal cannabis oil (CO) emerges as a promising therapeutic approach. Furthermore, phytocannabinoids exhibit potent antioxidant properties, making them highly desirable in the treatment of cardiac pathologies, such as hypertension-induced cardiac hypertrophy (CH). 

Objective: To evaluate the effect of CO treatment on hypertrophy and mitochondrial status in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) hearts. 

Methods: Three-month-old male SHR were randomly assigned to CO or olive oil (vehicle) oral treatment for 1 month. We evaluated cardiac mass and histology, mitochondrial dynamics, membrane potential, area and density, myocardial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and citrate synthase (CS) activity and expression. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n) and compared by t-test, or two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test were used as appropriate. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 

Results: CH was reduced by CO treatment, as indicated by the left ventricular weight/tibia length ratio, left ventricular mass index, myocyte cross-sectional area, and left ventricle collagen volume fraction. The ejection fraction was preserved in the CO-treated group despite the persistence of elevated systolic blood pressure and the reduction in CH. Mitochondrial membrane potential was improved and mitochondrial biogenesis, dynamics, area, and density were all increased by treatment. Moreover, the activity and expression of the CS were enhanced by treatment, whereas ROS production was decreased and the antioxidant activity of SOD increased by CO administration. 

Conclusion: Based on the mentioned results, we propose that 1-month oral treatment with CO is effective to reduce hypertrophy, improve the mitochondrial pool and increase the antioxidant capacity in SHR hearts.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39137344/

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/can.2024.0066