Tag Archives: 2-AG

Endocannabinoid chemical biology: a tool for the development of novel therapies.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The identification of the major psychoactive constituent of Cannabis and marijuana, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, opened the way first to the cloning of the G-protein-coupled cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, and then to the isolation and characterisation of their endogenous agonists, the endocannabinoids. Considerable progress has been made in the characterisation of pathways and enzymes for the biosynthesis and degradation of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, the two best-known endocannabinoids, as well as of endocannabinoid-related molecules, such as the N-acylethanolamines, which, as in the case of N-palmitoylethanolamine and N-oleoylethanolamine, may interact with other receptor types. However, it is still not fully understood how other plant cannabinoids, of which cannabidiol is the most studied representative, exert their pharmacological effects. Together with these issues, this first review article on the endocannabinoids describes the synthetic pharmacological tools that have been designed so far to interact with the proteins of the ‘endocannabinoid system’ and that can potentially be used as templates for the development of new therapies.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19457702

The endocannabinoid system: a general view and latest additions

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“After the discovery, in the early 1990s, of specific G-protein-coupled receptors for marijuana’s psychoactive principle Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, the cannabinoid receptors, and of their endogenous agonists, the endocannabinoids, a decade of investigations has greatly enlarged our understanding of this altogether new signalling system. Yet, while the finding of the endocannabinoids resulted in a new effort to reveal the mechanisms regulating their levels in the brain and peripheral organs under physiological and pathological conditions, more endogenous substances with a similar action, and more molecular targets for the previously discovered endogenous ligands, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, or for some of their metabolites, were being proposed. As the scenario becomes subsequently more complicated, and the experimental tasks to be accomplished correspondingly more numerous, we briefly review in this article the latest ‘additions’ to the endocannabinoid system together with earlier breakthroughs that have contributed to our present knowledge of the biochemistry and pharmacology of the endocannabinoids.”

Introduction

“The discovery in the early 1990s of specific membrane receptors of marijuana’s psychoactive component (-)-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) opened the way to the revelation of a whole endogenous signaling system now known as the endocannabinoid system. Apart from the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors (Pertwee, 1997), this system comprises also their endogenous ligands (the endocannabinoids) and the proteins for their synthesis and inactivation, as well as other molecular targets for the endocannabinoids. However, as new findings on the regulation of the levels and action of the endocannabinoids, and new data on their possible physiological and pathological role, are reported every day in the literature, it is easy to understand that the story of the endocannabinoid system is far from set. For example, while until the end of the 20th century only two endocannabinoids, anandamide (N-arachidonoyl-ethanolamine, AEA) and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol (2-AG) had been discovered (Devane et al., 1992; Mechoulam et al., 1995; Sugiura et al., 1995), in just a couple of years, three more candidates to the role of cannabinoid receptor agonists have been proposed: 2-arachidonyl-glyceryl ether (noladin, 2-AGE), O-arachidonoyl-ethanolamine (virhodamine) and N-arachidonoyl-dopamine (NADA) (Bisogno et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2002; Porter et al., 2002). These findings not only suggest that the endocannabinoid family is larger than initially thought but also enlarge our view on the possible molecular mechanisms for the biosynthesis, action and inactivation of these lipid mediators. This brief article aims at giving a picture as much updated as possible on the ‘old’ and ‘new’ components of the endocannabinoid system, while highlighting the latest and most important findings in this field.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1574255/

 

The endocannabinoid system: its general strategy of action, tools for its pharmacological manipulation and potential therapeutic exploitation.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The endocannabinoid signalling system includes: (1) at least two G-protein-coupled receptors, known as the cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors and discovered following studies on the mechanism of action of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, the major psychoactive principle of the hemp plant Cannabis sativa; (2) the endogenous agonists at these receptors, known as endocannabinoids, of which anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are the best known; and (3) proteins and enzymes for the regulation of endocannabinoid levels and action at receptors. The endocannabinoid system is quite widespread in mammalian tissues and cells and appears to play a pro-homeostatic role by being activated following transient or chronic perturbation of homeostasis, and by regulating in a local way the levels and action of other chemical signals. Compounds that selectively manipulate the action and levels of endocannabinoids at their targets have been and are being developed, and represent templates for potential new therapeutic drugs.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19559360

An introduction to the endocannabinoid system: from the early to the latest concepts

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“A rather complex and pleiotropic endogenous signalling system was discovered in the late 1990s, starting from studies on the mechanism of action of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, the major psychoactive principle of the hemp plant Cannabis sativa. This system includes: (1) at least two G-protein-coupled receptors, known as the cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors; (2) the endogenous agonists at these receptors, known as endocannabinoids, of which anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are the best known; and (3) proteins and enzymes for the regulation of endocannabinoid levels and action at receptors. The number of the members of this endocannabinoid signalling system seems to be ever increasing as new non-CB(1) non-CB(2) receptors for endocannabinoids, endocannabinoid-related molecules with little activity at CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, and new enzymes for endocannabinoid biosynthesis and degradation are being identified every year. The complexity of the endocannabinoid system and of its physiological and pathological function is outlined in this introductory chapter, for a better understanding of the subsequent chapters in this special issue.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19285257

Pharmacological actions of cannabinoids.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Mammalian tissues express at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, both G protein coupled. CB1 receptors are expressed predominantly at nerve terminals where they mediate inhibition of transmitter release. CB2 receptors are found mainly on immune cells, one of their roles being to modulate cytokine release. Endogenous ligands for these receptors (endocannabinoids) also exist. These are all eicosanoids; prominent examples include arachidonoylethanolamide (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol. These discoveries have led to the development of CB1- and CB2-selective agonists and antagonists and of bioassays for characterizing such ligands. Cannabinoid receptor antagonists include the CB1-selective SR141716A, AM251, AM281 and LY320135, and the CB2-selective SR144528 and AM630. These all behave as inverse agonists, one indication that CB1 and CB2 receptors can exist in a constitutively active state. Neutral cannabinoid receptor antagonists that seem to lack inverse agonist properties have recently also been developed. As well as acting on CB1 and CB2 receptors, there is convincing evidence that anandamide can activate transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptors. Certain cannabinoids also appear to have non-CB1, non-CB2, non-TRPV1 targets, for example CB2-like receptors that can mediate antinociception and “abnormal-cannabidiol” receptors that mediate vasorelaxation and promote microglial cell migration. There is evidence too for TRPV1-like receptors on glutamatergic neurons, for alpha2-adrenoceptor-like (imidazoline) receptors at sympathetic nerve terminals, for novel G protein-coupled receptors for R-(+)-WIN55212 and anandamide in the brain and spinal cord, for novel receptors for delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabinol on perivascular sensory nerves and for novel anandamide receptors in the gastro-intestinal tract. The presence of allosteric sites for cannabinoids on various ion channels and non-cannabinoid receptors has also been proposed. In addition, more information is beginning to emerge about the pharmacological actions of the non-psychoactive plant cannabinoid, cannabidiol. These recent advances in cannabinoid pharmacology are all discussed in this review.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16596770

Cannabinoid receptor systems: therapeutic targets for tumour intervention

Posted on by
2

Abstract

“The past decade has witnessed a rapid expansion of our understanding of the biological roles of cannabinoids and their cognate receptors. It is now certain that Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the principle psychoactive component of the Cannabis sativa plant, binds and activates membrane receptors of the 7-transmembrane domain, G-protein-coupled superfamily. Several putative endocannabinoids have since been identified, including anandamide, 2-arachidonyl glycerol and noladin ether. Synthesis of numerous cannabinomimetics has also greatly expanded the repertoire of cannabinoid receptor ligands with the pharmacodynamic properties of agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists. Collectively, these ligands have proven to be powerful tools both for the molecular characterisation of cannabinoid receptors and the delineation of their intrinsic signalling pathways. Much of our understanding of the signalling mechanisms activated by cannabinoids is derived from studies of receptors expressed by tumour cells; hence, this review provides a succinct summary of the molecular pharmacology of cannabinoid receptors and their roles in tumour cell biology. Moreover, there is now a genuine expectation that the manipulation of cannabinoid receptor systems may have therapeutic potential for a diverse range of human diseases. Thus, this review also summarises the demonstrated antitumour actions of cannabinoids and indicates possible avenues for the future development of cannabinoids as antitumour agents.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14640910

Changes in the Endocannabinoid System May Give Insight into new and Effective Treatments for Cancer

Posted on by
Reply

Logo of nihpa

“The endocannabinoid system comprises specific cannabinoid receptors such as Cb1 and Cb2, the endogenous ligands (anandamide and 2-arachidonyl glycerol among others) and the proteins responsible for their synthesis and degradation. This system has become the focus of research in recent years because of its potential therapeutic value several disease states. The following review describes our current knowledge of the changes that occur in the endocannabinoid system during carcinogenesis and then focuses on the effects of anandamide on various aspects of the carcinogenic process such as growth, migration, and angiogenesis in tumors from various origins.

Marijuana and its derivatives have been used in medicine for centuries, however, it was not until the isolation of the psychoactive component of Cannabis sativa (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol; Δ9-THC) and the subsequent discovery of the endogenous cannabinoid signaling system that research into the therapeutic value of this system reemerged. Ongoing research is determining that regulation of the endocannabinoid system may be effective in the treatment of pain (Calignano et al., 1998; Manzanares et al., 1999), glaucoma (Voth and Schwartz, 1997), and neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (Piomelli et al., 2000) and multiple sclerosis (Baker et al., 2000). In addition, cannabinoids might be effective anti-tumoral agents because of their ability to inhibit the growth of various types of cancer cell lines in culture (De Petrocellis et al., 1998; Ruiz et al., 1999; Sanchez et al., 1998, 2001) and in laboratory animals (Galve-Roperh et al., 2000).

In conclusion, the endocannabinoid system exerts a myriad of effects on tumor cell growth, progression, angiogenesis, and migration. With a notable few exceptions, targeting the endocannabinoid system with agents that activate cannabinoid receptors or increase the endogenous levels of AEA may prove to have therapeutic benefit in the treatment of various cancers. Further studies into the downstream consequences of AEA treatment are required and may illuminate other potential therapeutic targets.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791688/

Possible endocannabinoid control of colorectal cancer growth.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“BACKGROUND & AIMS:

The endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) inhibit cancer cell proliferation by acting at cannabinoid receptors (CBRs). We studied (1). the levels of endocannabinoids, cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH, which catalyzes endocannabinoid hydrolysis) in colorectal carcinomas (CRC), adenomatous polyps, and neighboring healthy mucosa; and (2). the effects of endocannabinoids, and of inhibitors of their inactivation, on human CRC cell proliferation.

METHODS:

Tissues were obtained from 21 patients by biopsy during colonoscopy. Endocannabinoids were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). CB(1), CB(2), and FAAH expression were analyzed by RT-PCR and Western immunoblotting. CRC cell lines (CaCo-2 and DLD-1) were used to test antiproliferative effects.

RESULTS:

All tissues and cells analyzed contain anandamide, 2-AG, CBRs, and FAAH. The levels of the endocannabinoids are 3- and 2-fold higher in adenomas and CRCs than normal mucosa. Anandamide, 2-AG, and the CBR agonist HU-210 potently inhibit CaCo-2 cell proliferation. This effect is blocked by the CB(1) antagonist SR141716A, but not by the CB(2) antagonist SR144528, and is mimicked by CB(1)-selective, but not CB(2)-selective, agonists. In DLD-1 cells, both CB(1) and CB(2) receptors mediate inhibition of proliferation. Inhibitors of endocannabinoid inactivation enhance CaCo-2 cell endocannabinoid levels and block cell proliferation, this effect being antagonized by SR141716A. CaCo-2 cell differentiation into noninvasive cells results in increased FAAH expression, lower endocannabinoid levels, and no responsiveness to cannabinoids.

CONCLUSIONS:

Endocannabinoid levels are enhanced in transformed colon mucosa cells possibly to counteract proliferation via CBRs. Inhibitors of endocannabinoid inactivation may prove useful anticancer agents.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12949714

Increased endocannabinoid levels reduce the development of precancerous lesions in the mouse colon

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Colorectal cancer is an increasingly important cause of death in Western countries. Endocannabinoids inhibit colorectal carcinoma cell proliferation in vitro. In this paper, we investigated the involvement of endocannabinoids on the formation of aberrant crypt foci (ACF, earliest preneoplastic lesions) in the colon mouse in vivo. ACF were induced by azoxymethane (AOM); fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and cannabinoid receptor messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels were analyzed by the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR); endocannabinoid levels were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; caspase-3 and caspase-9 expressions were measured by Western blot analysis. Colonic ACF formation after AOM administration was associated with increased levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (with no changes in FAAH and cannabinoid receptor mRNA levels) and reduction in cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-9 expression. The FAAH inhibitor N-arachidonoylserotonin increased colon endocannabinoid levels, reduced ACF formation, and partially normalized cleaved caspase-3 (but not caspase-9) expression. Notably, N-arachidonoylserotonin completely prevented the formation of ACF with four or more crypts, which have been show to be best correlated with final tumor incidence. The effect of N-arachidonoylserotonin on ACF formation was mimicked by the cannabinoid receptor agonist HU-210. No differences in ACF formation were observed between CB(1) receptor-deficient and wild-type mice. It is concluded that pharmacological enhancement of endocannabinoid levels (through inhibition of endocannabinoid hydrolysis) reduces the development of precancerous lesions in the mouse colon. The protective effect appears to involve caspase-3 (but not caspase-9) activation.

Cannabinoids have been licensed for clinical use as palliative treatment of chemotherapy, but increasing evidence shows antitumor actions of cannabinoid agonists on several tumor cells in vitro and in animal models [4, 5]. The main psychotropic cannabinoid is Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, which exerts its biological effects mainly by activating two G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors, named CB1 and CB2 receptors [5]. Endogenous ligands for the cannabinoid receptors have been identified; the best known are arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) [4–6]. When released, anandamide and 2-AG are removed from extracellular compartments by a carrier-mediated reuptake process, and once within the cell, both endocannabinoids are hydrolyzed by intracellular hydrolytic enzymes of which the enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is capable of recognizing both compounds as substrates [5, 6].

The proposed mechanisms of the antitumoral effect of cannabinoids are complex and may involve induction of apoptosis in tumor cells, antiproliferative actions, and an antimetastatic effects through inhibition of angiogenesis and tumor cell migration [6]. Concerning the gastrointestinal tract, it has been shown that cannabinoid receptor agonists, mostly via CB1 activation, potently inhibit the cell proliferation of colorectal carcinoma cell lines [7]. Furthermore, compounds capable of inhibiting endocannabinoid degradation and hence of prolonging the lifespan of endocannabinoids only when and where these compounds are produced to exert physiological or pathophysiological functions also inhibit colorectal carcinoma growth in vitro [7].

In summary, the present study provides strong evidence that enhancement of colon endocannabinoid levels through pharmacological inhibition of their enzymatic hydrolysis may be protective against preneoplastic lesions in the mouse colon; a condition that, like humans adenomatous polyps and colorectal carcinoma [7], is accompanied by an elevated endocannabinoid tone. This protective effect could be due to indirect activation of one or more of the several targets proposed to date for the endocannabinoids and appears to involve caspase-3 activation and subsequent apoptosis of colon preneoplastic cells. Further studies will be required to investigate if cannabinoid CB2 receptors are involved in the protective effects of AA-5-HT and HU210 and if these effects have any therapeutic relevance for the treatment of human colon carcinoma.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2755791/

Endocannabinoids in platelets of chronic migraine patients and medication-overuse headache patients: relation with serotonin levels.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“BACKGROUND:

Chronic migraine (CM) and medication-overuse headaches (MOH) are well-recognized disabling conditions affecting a significant portion of the headache population attending centers specialized in treating headaches. A dysfunctioning of the serotonergic system has been demonstrated in MOH and CM patients. Here we report on our assessment of the dysfunctioning of the endocannabinoid system as a potential underlying factor in pathogenic mechanisms involved in CM and MOH.

METHOD:

To test the hypothesis of an impairment in the endocannabinoid system in patients with MOH and CM and to assess its relationship with any disruption of the serotonergic system, we determined the levels of the two main endogenous cannabinoids, anandamide (AEA) and 2-acylglycerol (2-AG), in platelets of 20 CM patients, 20 MOH patients and 20 control subjects and also measured the platelet serotonin levels in the same patients.

RESULTS:

We found that 2-AG and AEA levels were significantly lower in MOH patients and CM patients than in the control subjects, without significant differences between the two patient groups. Serotonin levels were also strongly reduced in the two patient groups and were correlated with 2-AG levels, with higher values for MOH patients.

CONCLUSION:

These data support the potential involvement of a dysfunctioning of the endocannabinoid and serotonergic systems in the pathology of CM and MOH. These systems appear to be mutually related and able to contribute to the chronification of both CM and MOH.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18004553