Effects of the novel cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist PF 514273 on the acquisition and expression of ethanol conditioned place preference.

“The centrally expressed cannabinoid receptor (CB1) has been considered a potential therapeutic target in treating alcoholism.

Though CB1 receptors have been shown to modulate primary and conditioned ethanol reward, much of this research employed animal models that require ethanol ingestion or oral routes of administration. This is problematic considering CB1 antagonist drugs have high anorectic liability and have been used clinically in the treatment of obesity. Therefore, the present study examined CB1 antagonism in DBA/2J mice using an unbiased ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure, a paradigm that does not require ethanol ingestion…

Results from the present study appear inconsistent with other studies that have demonstrated a role for CB1 antagonism in ethanol reward using oral administration paradigms.

Our findings suggest that CB1 antagonism may have greater involvement in consummatory behavior than ethanol reward.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24954022

http://www.thctotalhealthcare.com/category/addiction/

Sickle Cell Pain May be Managed with Cannabis

“Can Medical Cannabis Help to Cure SCD?”

Sickle Cell Disease Pain May Be Managed 2

“Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary condition caused by a mutation in the haemoglobin gene, which leads to symptoms of anaemia, extreme pain, and organ damage if unmanaged.”

Sickle Cell Disease Pain May Be Managed 1

“Individuals suffering from SCD are far more likely to use cannabis than the general population, potentially for its analgesic properties.

In 2010, researchers at the University of Minnesota found that the synthetic THC analogue CP 55,940 was as effective as morphine sulphate in treating SCD-related severe pain in transgenic mice expressing human sickle haemoglobin, and that it was effective at smaller doses than the opioid.

In 2011, a further paper submitted by the same researchers to Blood (the Journal of the American Association of Hematology) indicated that CP 55,940 ameliorated severe pain associated with the hypoxia/reoxygenation cycle. CP 55,940 is a full agonist of both CB receptors, and is thought to act as an antagonist at the GPR55 receptor.

As well as this, cannabis has been repeatedly shown to act as a vasodilator, which could in itself assist in easing the blockages caused by build-up of sickle cells…

SCD is a painful and debilitating disease, and the overall inefficacy of opioid treatments and resultant poor quality of life for many sufferers is an indication that our approach to it is far from perfect.

If cannabis is a good candidate to replace opioids, it should be implemented forthwith to prevent ongoing suffering for existing patients.”

http://sensiseeds.com/en/blog/sickle-cell-pain-may-managed-cannabis/

Antagonism of cannabinoid receptor 2 pathway suppresses IL-6-induced immunoglobulin IgM secretion.

“Cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) is expressed predominantly in the immune system, particularly in plasma cells, raising the possibility that targeting the CB2 pathway could yield an immunomodulatory effect.

Although the role of CB2 in mediating immunoglobulin class switching has been reported, the effects of targeting the CB2 pathway on immunoglobulin secretion per se remain unclear…

These results uncover a novel function of CB2 antagonists and suggest that CB2 ligands may be potential modulators of immunoglobulin secretion.”

Signaling through cannabinoid receptor 2 suppresses murine dendritic cell migration by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression

“The cannabinoid system consists of cannabinoid receptors and their ligands, including endocannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists, and phytocannabinoids.

Administration of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R) agonists in inflammatory and autoimmune disease and CNS injury models results in significant attenuation of clinical disease, and reduction of inflammatory mediators.

…cannabinoids contribute to resolve acute inflammation and to reestablish homeostasis.

Selective CB2R agonists might be valuable future therapeutic agents for the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions by targeting activated immune cells, including DCs.

Because of their anti-inflammatory functions targeting various immune cells, CB2R agonists could represent valuable therapeutic agents for the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3488886/

Immunoactive effects of cannabinoids: considerations for the therapeutic use of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists

Figure 1

“The active constituents of Cannabis sativa have been used for centuries as recreational drugs and medicinal agents. Today, marijuana is the most prevalent drug of abuse in the United States and, conversely, therapeutic use of marijuana constituents are gaining mainstream clinical and political acceptance.

Given the documented contributions of endocannabinoid signaling to a range of physiological systems, including cognitive function, and the control of eating behaviors, it is unsurprising that cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists are showing significant clinical potential.

In addition to the neuroactive effects of cannabinoids, an emerging body of data suggests that both endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids are potently immunoactive.

The central premise of this review article is that the immunological effects of cannabinoids should be considered in the context of each prescribing decision.

We present evidence that the immunological effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists are highly relevant to the spectrum of disorders for which cannabinoid therapeutics are currently offered.

Therapeutically relevant cannabinoid receptor ligands include tetra-hydrocannabinol itself, its synthetic forms, and its closely related compounds.

As a final point, the application of CB1 antagonists may be immunostimulative…”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3804300/

Updating the chemistry and biology of cannabinoid CB2 receptor-specific inverse agonists.

“The cannabinoid CB(2) receptor continues to be an intriguing target for the potential therapeutic benefit of cannabinoids. Because this receptor is significantly found outside the brain, compounds specific for the CB(2) receptor may be free of the side effects that have plagued cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-based therapeutics.

In this review, we will discuss a class of compounds which modulate the constitutive activity of the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor, the inverse agonists. We will discuss recent chemical advances that provide new compounds to investigate the biology based on this pharmacology. We will then discuss new biology associated with the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor for hints of how these compounds can best be utilized in vivo.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20370714

Biology and therapeutic potential of cannabinoid CB2 receptor inverse agonists

Figure 2

“Evidence has emerged suggesting a role for the cannabinoid CB2 receptor in immune cell motility. This provides a rationale for a novel and generalized immunoregulatory role for cannabinoid CB2 receptor-specific compounds…

An ability to control the migration of inflammatory cells to the site of insult is a powerful strategy for the development of immunomodulators. Our work on triaryl bis-sulphones suggest that the cannabinoid CB2 receptor-specific inverse agonists may serve as such immune modulators…

Further studies, using these and other CB2 receptor-specific compounds, will be required to resolve the complex pharmacology of cannabinoids and the cannabinoid CB2 receptor, and to determine the most effective pharmacology to exploit this therapeutic target.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2219522/

A biosynthetic pathway for anandamide

“The endocannabinoid arachidonoyl ethanolamine (anandamide) is a lipid transmitter synthesized and released “on demand” by neurons in the brain. Anandamide is also generated by macrophages where its endotoxin (LPS)-induced synthesis has been implicated in the hypotension of septic shock and advanced liver cirrhosis. Anandamide can be generated from its membrane precursor, N-arachidonoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (NAPE) through cleavage by a phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD).

Here we document a biosynthetic pathway for anandamide in mouse brain…

Both PTPN22 and endocannabinoids have been implicated in autoimmune diseases, suggesting that the PLC/phosphatase pathway of anandamide synthesis may be a pharmacotherapeutic target.

The observed exclusive role of the PLC/phosphatase pathway in LPS-induced AEA synthesis may offer therapeutic targets for the treatment of these conditions.

Furthermore, cannabinoids have immunosuppressive effects in autoimmune models of multiple sclerosis and diabetes, and mice deficient in CB1 receptors show increased susceptibility to neuronal damage found in autoimmune encephalitis…”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557387/#!po=23.3333

Multiple sclerosis may disrupt endocannabinoid brain protection mechanism

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zpq0180620550001.jpg

“Since the discovery of the endocannabinoids [eCB; anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), various pathological conditions were shown to increase the eCB tone and to inhibit molecular mechanisms that are involved in the production, release, and diffusion of harmful mediators such as proinflammatory cytokines or excess glutamate.

In this issue of PNAS, Witting et al.  demonstrate that, unexpectedly and contrary to the effects of other brain diseases, cell damage induced by experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an immune-mediated disease widely used as a laboratory model of multiple sclerosis (MS), does not lead to enhancement of eCB levels, although the cannabinoid receptors remain functional.

Nearly two decades ago, Lyman et al.  reported that Δ9-THC, the psychoactive component of marijuana, suppresses the symptoms of EAE. A few years later, Wirguin et al. reported the same effect by Δ8-THC, a more stable and less psychotropic analogue of Δ9-THC.

Thus, THC was shown to inhibit both clinical and histological signs of EAE even before the endocannabinoids were described.

THC was also shown to control spasticity and tremor in chronic relapsing EAE, a further autoimmune model of MS , and to inhibit glutamate release via activation of the CB1-cannabinoid receptor in EAE. Moreover, mice deficient in the cannabinoid receptor CB1 tolerate inflammatory and excitotoxic insults poorly and develop substantial neurodegeneration after immune attack in EAE.

Thus, the brain loses some of its endogenous neuroprotective capacity, but it may still respond to exogenous treatment with 2-AG or other CB1 agonists. Assuming that the biochemical changes taking place in the EAE model of MS are similar to those in MS itself, these results represent a biochemical-based support to the positive outcome noted with cannabinoid therapy in MS.

These data suggest that the high level of IFN-γ in the CNS, noted in mice with EAE, disrupts eCB-mediated neuroprotection, while maintaining functional cannabinoid receptors, thus providing additional support for the use of cannabinoid-based medicine to treat MS.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1458835/

The plant cannabinoid Delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin can decrease signs of inflammation and inflammatory pain in mice.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.<br /><br />
Object name is bph0160-0677-f1.jpg

“The phytocannabinoid, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), can block cannabinoid CB(1) receptors… THCV can activate CB(2) receptors… THCV can activate CB2 receptors and decrease signs of inflammation and inflammatory pain in mice partly via CB1 and/or CB2 receptor activation…

Because there is evidence that THCV can behave as a CB1 receptor antagonist in vivo, it would also be of interest to explore the possibility that this compound can suppress unwanted symptoms in animal models of disorders in which symptoms can be ameliorated by a combination of CB2 receptor activation and CB1 receptor blockade…”  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2931567/